JB/096/331/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:12, 4 February 2020

A2 DISSENTERS Penal Laws

weight of the general indignation; on no subject is the sense of the nation universal in any other import. If there were really two parties upon this question, the
intolerant party, thus armed by the Law, must tread
upon the other: the other underfoot: as the case was in Charles & James the 2d's reign
& would have been to a much greater degree, had it
not been for that sort of - - - - - partial reconciliation which is
produced by the instant terror of Popery the a common enemy, long
since removed.

that their comment upon that text yourselves to every ordinance of man It is not necessary to enter into the delicate question
how far upon extraordinary occasions, in extraordinary stituations & upon extraordinary necessity it may be
lawful, that is it may be can be admitted to be expedient for the Rulers
of the nation to act for what they suppose it's interests against its' what
known they know to be it's sentiments: sure I am, that nothing has
appear'd of late to indicate any such extraordinary
necessity, nor even, as I can learn, has been alledged.

Let us consider for a moment on the side of consistency,
morality probity & prudence what upon this hypothesis
must be the lesson which these titled superior ministers
of Religion preach by this their conduct more forcibly
than by a thousand Sermons.

Identifier: \| JB/096/331/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	096	Main Headings	legislation
Folio number	331	Info in main headings field	dissenters penal laws
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[partial lion with crown motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	31335
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
-<head>A2
+<head>A2</head>
+<head>DISSENTERS  Penal Laws</head>
-DISSENTERS Penal Laws</head>
+<p><note>weight of the general indignation; on no subject is the sense of the nation universal in any other import.</note>  If there were really two parties upon this question, the
+<lb/>
+intolerant party, thus armed by the Law, must tread
+<lb/>
+upon the other: <add>the other underfoot:</add> as the case was in Charles <add>&amp; James</add> the 2<hi rend='superscript'>d's</hi> reign
+<lb/>
+&amp; would have been to a much greater degree, had it
+<lb/>
+not been for that sort of - - - - - <add>partial reconciliation</add> which is
+<lb/>
+produced by the <add><hi rend='underline'>instant</hi></add> terror of  <add>Popery the</add> a common enemy, long
+<lb/>
+since removed.
+<lb/></p>
-<note>
+<p><!-- indented --><note><del>that their comment upon that <gap/> text <gap/> yourselves to every ordinance of man</del></note>  It is not necessary to enter into the delicate question
-<unclear>weight</unclear> of the general<lb/> indignation; on no<lb/> subject is the <unclear>sense</unclear> of the nation universal in any other<lb/> import.</note>
+<lb/>
+how far upon extraordinary occasions, <add>in extraordinary s<del>t</del>ituations &amp; upon extraordinary necessity</add> it may be
+<lb/>
+lawful, that is it may be <add>can be admitted to be</add> expedient for the Rulers
+<lb/>
+of the nation to act for <add>what they suppose</add> <sic>it's</sic> interests against <del><sic>its'</sic></del> <add>what</add>
+<lb/>
+<del>known</del> <add>they know to be <sic>it's</sic></add> sentiments: sure I am, that nothing has
+<lb/>
+<sic>appear'd</sic> of late to indicate any such extraordinary
+<lb/>
+necessity, nor even, as I can learn, has been <sic>alledged</sic>.
+<lb/></p>
-If there were really two parties upon this question, the<lb/>intolerant party, thus armed by the Law, must tread<lb/>upon the other,<add>the other underfoot</add>, as the case was <gap/> Charles <add>&amp;added text James</add> the 2<hi rend='superscript'>d<unclear>'s</unclear></hi> reign<lb/>&amp; would have been to a much greater degree, had it<lb/>not been for that sort of . . . . .<add>partial reconciliation</add>which is<lb/>produced by the <unclear>terror</unclear><add><unclear>instant</unclear></add> of a <add>Popery the</add>common enemy, long<lb/>since removed.
+<p><!-- indented -->Let us consider for a moment on the side of consistency,
+<lb/>
-<note><gap/> <gap/> <unclear>comment</unclear> upon<lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/>yourselves <gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/>of <gap/></note>
+morality <add>probity</add> &amp; prudence what upon this hypothesis
+<lb/>
-<p>It is not necessary to enter into the delicate question<lb/>how far upon extraordinary occasions,<add>in extraordinary <unclear>situations</unclear> &amp; upon extraordinary <gap/></add> it may be<lb/>lawful, that is it may be expedient <add>can be admitted to be</add>for the <unclear>Rulers</unclear><lb/>of the nation to act for its interests<add>what they suppose</add> against <del>its'</del><add>what<lb/></add><del><gap/></del><add>they know to be its'</add>sentiments. <unclear>sure</unclear> I am, that nothing has<lb/>appear'd of late to indicate any such extraordinary<lb/>necessity, nor even, as I can learn, has been <sic>alledged.</sic><lb/></p>
+must be the lesson which these titled <add>superior</add> ministers
+<lb/>
-Let us consider for a moment on the side of consistency,<lb/><add><unclear>probity</unclear></add>morality &amp; prudence what upon this hypothesis<lb/>must be the <gap/> which these <add><unclear>superior</unclear></add> <unclear>killed</unclear> ministers<lb/>of Religion preach by this their conduct more forcibly<lb/>than by a thousand sermons.
+of Religion preach by this their conduct more forcibly
+<lb/>
+than by a thousand Sermons.
+<lb/></p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/096/331/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:12, 4 February 2020

Navigation

Search