★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/057/108/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/057/108/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- date, heading and marginal note in pencil --> | |||
<p>6 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1805</p> <head> procedure</head> <p><note>Procedure removal<lb/> <sic>Ch.</sic>1</note><lb/> (5</p> <p> for this as for other purposes, the quantity of emolument which the sovereign<lb/> can afford to allow at the expense of the property of the people<lb/> will be a limited quantity. For <del> the <gap/> of</del> a purpose of this<lb/>sort he might be able to <del>afford</del> allow to a single Judge or a<lb/> small number of Judges sitting in a Supreme Court of Appeal <lb/>such a <add>a greater</add> mass of involvement as <add>than</add> it would be impossible, <add> possible</add> consistently<lb/> at least with a due regard to economy, to allow to the<lb/> Judges of each one of the several immediate Courts.</p> <p> This then, it should seem, may be regarded as a point established,<lb/> viz: that <del>such a degree of trust</del> to a single Judge<lb/> or a <add>other</add> small number of Judges sitting in the Metropolis such a<lb/>degree of trustworthiness may be given and <add>with just cause/on just grounds</add> ascribed<lb/> as can not be given or reasonably ascribed to the aggregate<lb/> number of immediate Judges: which is as much as to say<lb/> that <del><gap/></del> in that same station a Judge or other small number<lb/> of Judges may be planted, in comparison of whom the Judges<lb/> of the immediate Courts may, indeed can not but be, regarded<lb/> as fit objects of suspicion, <add> viz: in virtue of/on the score of their situation</add> and that without any imputation<lb/> on the personal characters of the individuals.</p> <p> <add>Not only will</add> The faculty of appeal be a remedy <add> in the way of satisfaction</add> against <del>injustice</del> <add><sic>misdecision</sic></add> <lb/> where it has actually taken place, but the apprehension of the<lb/>exercise of that faculty will naturally operate in the character of a<lb/> preventative remedy on the mind of the Judge below: viz: in so far as<lb/> the evidence of <sic>misdecision</sic> is in his power, and is not <add> not being</add> the<lb/> result of <unclear>invisible</unclear> and morally blameless incapacity <add>and</add> or ignorance.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
6 Aug. 1805
procedure
Procedure removal
Ch.1
(5
for this as for other purposes, the quantity of emolument which the sovereign
can afford to allow at the expense of the property of the people
will be a limited quantity. For the of a purpose of this
sort he might be able to afford allow to a single Judge or a
small number of Judges sitting in a Supreme Court of Appeal
such a a greater mass of involvement as than it would be impossible, possible consistently
at least with a due regard to economy, to allow to the
Judges of each one of the several immediate Courts.
This then, it should seem, may be regarded as a point established,
viz: that such a degree of trust to a single Judge
or a other small number of Judges sitting in the Metropolis such a
degree of trustworthiness may be given and with just cause/on just grounds ascribed
as can not be given or reasonably ascribed to the aggregate
number of immediate Judges: which is as much as to say
that in that same station a Judge or other small number
of Judges may be planted, in comparison of whom the Judges
of the immediate Courts may, indeed can not but be, regarded
as fit objects of suspicion, viz: in virtue of/on the score of their situation and that without any imputation
on the personal characters of the individuals.
Not only will The faculty of appeal be a remedy in the way of satisfaction against injustice misdecision
where it has actually taken place, but the apprehension of the
exercise of that faculty will naturally operate in the character of a
preventative remedy on the mind of the Judge below: viz: in so far as
the evidence of misdecision is in his power, and is not not being the
result of invisible and morally blameless incapacity and or ignorance.
|
Identifier: | JB/057/108/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1805-08-06 |
|||
|
057 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
|
108 |
procedure |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
18438 |
|||
