JB/096/167/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/167/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/167/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/167/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''


<head>PUNISHMENT <add>it's END</add> <add>KEYMIS</add><!--  "There is at least one
<div>
lesser but not negligible figure to be reckoned with – Henry Home, Lord Kames
                <head>PUNISHMENT <add>it's END</add> KEYMIS  VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE</head>  
(1696-1782).  It is certainly the case that Bentham refers approvingly to Kames on
               
several occasions in his early writings (and we need not attach too much significance
                <p> "Upon certain actions hurtful to others the stamp of<lb/>  
to the fact the consistently misspelt the name as ‘Keymis’). Kames’s Historical Law
                    <hi rend='underline'>impropriety</hi> &amp; <hi rend='underline'>wrong</hi> is impressed in Character visible<lb/>
Tracts (1758) do seem to have made a favourable impression on Bentham...." from BENTHAM AND THE SCOTS 
                    to all, not excepting the delinquent." If <add>it is</add> hereby <del>the</del><lb/>  
J. H. Burns, p. 5 -  http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/658/1/9.5burns_scots.pdf --> VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE</head><lb/> <p>"Upon certain actions hurtful to others the x of<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>impropriety</hi> &amp; <hi rend='underline'>wrong</hi> is impressed? in Characters x<lb/> to all, not excepting the delinquent." If <add>it is</add> hereby <del>the</del><lb/> <del>Author</del> means, that certain actions are generally &amp;<lb/> readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true<lb/> &amp; it is from conceiving that perceiving or x that our indignation is produced <add>judgment of his guilt</add> <add>underx into x petty</add><lb/> if it be any thing more than a confused<lb/> and x x disapprobation.</p> <note>When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason &amp; no other.</note><pb/><!-- Here the page is extended by the addition of separate sheet (pinned or stitched? to the first. --><note> The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the x x interest, or rather ins...</note><add>it is the natural inconsistency of men &amp; the impossibility<lb/> of entertaining? an underx adherence? to the con?nexion<lb/> he has taken up that saves him.<lb/></add><head> PUNISHMENT It's END</head> // <p>Resentment is a criticism of right &amp; wrong &amp; why? + because<lb/> it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest<lb/> of Society &#x2014; but suppose it produced by an action not<lb/> mischievous? Is it then a criticism of right &amp; wrong?<lb/> no surely &#x2014; <del>or else</del> what <add>else</add> do we mean by an unjust<lb/> resentment</p> + v.? Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet x voices of x religion, which is always to mean to be so the x of such a man x, rises at the sight of x x: but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so. T ???  unless whenever a man is angry,  x and apprised> of all the facts for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never be a fit criticism/criterion to be x to
                    <del>Author</del> means, that certain actions are generally &amp; <lb/>  
PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.
                    readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true<lb/>
 
                    &amp; it is from conceiving <add>perceiving or at last</add> that our indignation  <add>judgment of his guilt <add><gap/><gap/><gap/> be guilty</add></add> is produced<lb/>  
 
                    if it be any thing more than a confused <lb/> and <foreign>sur <sic>parrole</sic></foreign> disapprobation.<lb/>  
                    <note>When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason &amp; no other.</note>
                    <!-- Here the page is extended by the addition of separate sheet (pinned or stitched? to the first.--> </p>
               
                <pb/>
            </div>
            <div>
                <head> PUNISHMENT It's END</head> 
                <p><note>The resentment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the <add><gap/></add> public interest, or rather since<!-- marginal note continues outside the margin at the top of the page above the heading --> it is the natural inconsistency of man &amp; the impossibility of understanding an <gap/>  adherence? to the <gap/> he has taken up that saves him.</note></p>  
               
                <p> Resentment is a criterion of right &amp; wrong &amp; why? <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>  
                    <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> v. Keymis Hist<hi rend='superscript'>y</hi> of the Criminal Law</note>  
                    <!-- not sure if this note continues after "Keymis" or is intended to be appended to the paragaph above -->  
                    <note>that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet <unclear>superior</unclear> <add>voice of</add> religion, which is always to mean to be so the resentment of such a man &amp;  <gap/>, rises at the sight of wickedness: but .... I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so.</note>
                    because<lb/>
                    it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest<lb/>
                    of Society &#x2014; but suppose it produced by an action not<lb/>
                    mischievous? Is it then a criterion of right &amp; wrong?<lb/>
                    no surely &#x2014; <del>or else</del> what <add>else</add> do we mean by an unjust<lb/> resentment</p>
               
                <p>They all <unclear>tacitly</unclear> suppose or refer to some <add><gap/></add> After which it <gap/><lb/>  
                    Unless whenever a man is angry,  &amp; <del>and</del> apprised of all the facts<lb/>
                    for <unclear>I will</unclear> do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never <lb/>
                    be a fit criterion to be trusted to. </p>
            </div>
            <div>
                <head>PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.</head>
               
                </div>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:12, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

               PUNISHMENT it's END  KEYMIS  VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE 
               

"Upon certain actions hurtful to others the stamp of
impropriety & wrong is impressed in Character visible
to all, not excepting the delinquent." If it is hereby the
Author means, that certain actions are generally &
readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true
& it is from conceiving perceiving or at last that our indignation judgment of his guilt <add> be guilty</add> is produced
if it be any thing more than a confused
and sur parrole disapprobation.
When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason & no other.

               
---page break---
                PUNISHMENT It's END  

The resentment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the public interest, or rather since it is the natural inconsistency of man & the impossibility of understanding an adherence? to the he has taken up that saves him.

Resentment is a criterion of right & wrong & why? + + v. Keymis Histy of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet superior voice of religion, which is always to mean to be so the resentment of such a man & , rises at the sight of wickedness: but .... I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so. because
it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest
of Society — but suppose it produced by an action not
mischievous? Is it then a criterion of right & wrong?
no surely — or else what else do we mean by an unjust
resentment

They all tacitly suppose or refer to some After which it
Unless whenever a man is angry, & and apprised of all the facts
for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never
be a fit criterion to be trusted to.

               PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.
               



Identifier: | JB/096/167/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

167

Info in main headings field

punishment end false vengeance keymis

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial initials]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31171

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in