JB/002/430/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/430/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


<head>Art. 15.</head>
<head>Art. 15.</head>
<note>Notes  39  Annuity Notes  26  430 <!-- in pencil --></note>
<p><note>Notes  39  Annuity Notes  26  430 <!-- in pencil --></note> the difference in the two cases is matter of accident, <lb/> however, and does not arise out of any difference <lb/>
in the nature of the two cases. The persons employed<lb/>
<del>under the Post Office</del> <add>as Vendors of Stamps <add>Receivers of Letters</add></add> are shopkeepers: the <lb/>
persons employ'd as Receivers of Letters are shopkeepers <lb/>
of a higher class: <add>a class not inferior to the other</add>
</p>


the difference in the two cases is matter of accident, <lb>
<p>This <gap/> sort of persons are the persons employ'd in<lb/>
however, and does not arise out of any difference <lb>
both instances: the business of the Receiver and Vendor<lb/>
in the nature of the two cases. The persons employed<lb>
of Stamps is not more complicated, in any degree<lb/>
<del>under the Post Office</del> <add>as Vendors of Stamps</add> <add>Receivor of Letters</add>  are shopkeepers: the <lb>
<del>shall</del> capable of influencing the point in question<lb/>
persons employ'd as Receivors of Letters are shopkeepers <lb>
than that of the Receiver and Forwarder of Letters.<lb/>
of a higher class: <add>a class not inferior to the other</add><lb>
The persons employ'd about the Letters are Shopkeepers:<lb/>
this same sort of persons are the persons employ'd in<lb>
The persons employ'd about the stamps<lb/>
both instances: the business of the Receiver and Vendor<lb>
are Shopkeepers of the same class, and frequently<lb/>
of transfer is not more complicated, in any degree<lb>
the same individuals. It is not more difficult<lb/>
<del><unclear>nor</unclear></del> capable of influencing the point in question<lb>
to count stamps than to count letters: nor to<lb/>
than that of the Receivor and Forwarder of Letters.<lb>
count money <del>produced</del> paid in the one account<lb/>
the persons employ'd about the Letters are Shopkeepers:<lb>
than money paid in the other. There are indeed<lb/>
the persons employ'd about the stamps<lb>
more varieties in the sums <unclear>received</unclear> in account<lb/>
are Shopkeepers of the same class, and frequently<lb>
of stamps than in the sums received in<lb/>
the same individuals. It is not more difficult<lb>
account of letters. So thus the account is in a <lb/>
to count stamps than to count letters: nor to<lb>
proportionate degree more complicated. But in<lb/>
count money <del>produced</del> found in the one account<lb>
each <del>case</del> <add>instance</add> the sum to be taken  on account<lb/>
than money found in the other. There are indeed<lb>
of <add>a</add> stamp <del>is</del> <add>stands</add> indicated in the <unclear>form</unclear> of the stamp<lb/>
more varieties in the sums ? in account<lb>
itself: so that the <del>complication</del> <add>difficulty is much less </add> is beyond comparison<lb/>
of stamps than in the same received in<lb>
less in the instance of this Government<lb/>
account of letters. So thus the account is in a <lb>
<del>a</del> commodity, than<add> it is</add> in the instance of the  
proportionate degree more complicated. But in<lb>
<del>stock</del><lb/>
each <del>case</del> <add>instance</add> the sum to be taken  on account<lb>
<del>in the</del> private stock (which forms <add>constitutes</add> the subject-matter<lb/>
of a stamp in x indicator in the frame? of the stamp<lb>
of the dealings) of the <unclear>newest</unclear> shopkeeper.<lb/> </p>{{Completed}}
itself: so that the xcomplication +difficulty is much less/ is beyond comparison<lb>
un less in the instance of this Government<lb>
x commodity, than +it is/ in the instance of the xthat<lb>
xin the/ private stock (which forms +constitutes the subject-matter<lb>
of the dealings) of the meanest? shopkeeper.<lb>
 
 
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Latest revision as of 09:27, 4 February 2020

File:JB 002 430 001.jpg

Click Here To Edit

Art. 15.

Notes 39 Annuity Notes 26 430 the difference in the two cases is matter of accident,
however, and does not arise out of any difference
in the nature of the two cases. The persons employed
under the Post Office as Vendors of Stamps <add>Receivers of Letters</add> are shopkeepers: the
persons employ'd as Receivers of Letters are shopkeepers
of a higher class: a class not inferior to the other

This sort of persons are the persons employ'd in
both instances: the business of the Receiver and Vendor
of Stamps is not more complicated, in any degree
shall capable of influencing the point in question
than that of the Receiver and Forwarder of Letters.
The persons employ'd about the Letters are Shopkeepers:
The persons employ'd about the stamps
are Shopkeepers of the same class, and frequently
the same individuals. It is not more difficult
to count stamps than to count letters: nor to
count money produced paid in the one account
than money paid in the other. There are indeed
more varieties in the sums received in account
of stamps than in the sums received in
account of letters. So thus the account is in a
proportionate degree more complicated. But in
each case instance the sum to be taken on account
of a stamp is stands indicated in the form of the stamp
itself: so that the complication difficulty is much less is beyond comparison
less in the instance of this Government
a commodity, than it is in the instance of the stock
in the private stock (which forms constitutes the subject-matter
of the dealings) of the newest shopkeeper.

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in