JB/096/054/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/054/002: Difference between revisions

TCMemoire (talk | contribs)
There was a note from 2012 that said to not amend this one because it is under construction, but no progress has been made since 2012. I am removing this note and finishing the transcript.
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<lb/>
<lb/>
task as that of settling it between them <add>making them friends again.</add>.
task as that of settling it between them <add>making them friends again.</add>.
<lb/></p>
</p>


<p><!-- indented -->I find it a vain thing to seek to guard myself against
<p>I find it a vain thing to seek to guard myself against
<lb/>
<lb/>
the charge of misrepresentation: <del>for</del> <add><del><gap/></del> <add>I</add> <add>consider a passage,</add> <del>if I give</del>  
the charge of misrepresentation: <add><del>for</del> <add>I</add> consider a passage,</add> <del>for if I give</del>  
<lb/>
<lb/>
according to the best of my judgment I give it the
according to the best of my judgment I give it the
Line 20: Line 20:
<lb/>
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>this</hi>.
<hi rend='underline'>this</hi>.
<lb/></p>
</p>


<!-- horizontal line -->
<p>[The Law of Nature.  <del>And</del> the Law of Revelation.
<p>[The Law of Nature.  <del>And</del> the Law of Revelation.
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>and the Law of Nations.</add>
and the Law of Nations.
<lb/></p>
</p>
<p>It was "necessary", + <note>+ p.44</note> our <sic>Auther</sic>, is of opinion,
<p>It was "necessary", + <note>+ p.44</note> our Author, is of opinion,
<lb/>
<lb/>
that he should give us this account of them; and
that he should give us this account of them; and
<lb/>
<lb/>
surely <del>there is some appearance of Laws <unclear>having</unclear></del> <add><unclear><del>no</del></unclear> very good account as it <add>should</add> <add>raised, we ought</add>
surely <del>there is some appearance of Laws <unclear>having</unclear></del> <add><del><gap/></del> very good account as it <add>should</add> seemed, we ought</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del><unclear>the sight</unclear> of it</del>, <add>to have of <del>them</del> the first two of them:</add> if as he assured us, no human
<del><unclear>the sight</unclear> of it</del>, <add>to have of <del>them</del> the first two of them:</add> if as he assures us, no human
<lb/>
<lb/>
Laws are to be <sic>suffer'd</sic> to contradict <del>these</del> <add>them"</add>.
Laws are to be <sic>suffer'd</sic> to contradict <del>these</del> <add>them"</add>.
Line 47: Line 46:
that a Law which does nothing but <add><del>as more than to</del></add> <hi rend='underline'>allow</hi>
that a Law which does nothing but <add><del>as more than to</del></add> <hi rend='underline'>allow</hi>
<lb/>
<lb/>
can be transgressed.<lb/></p>
can be transgressed.</p>
<p>[It was necessary we should have a good account of
<p>[It was necessary we should have a good account of
<lb/>
<lb/>
Line 54: Line 53:
maker is this Law of Nature: this will "is inevitably
maker is this Law of Nature: this will "is inevitably
<lb/>
<lb/>
conformed to", not in <del><unclear>a</unclear></del> <add><unclear>wide</unclear> <add><gap/> and there a</add> point as <del>you</del> <add>one</add>  
conformed to", not in <del><gap/></del> <add>one</add> <add>here and there a</add> point as <del>you</del> <add>one</add>  
<lb/>
<lb/>
might suppose, but in "all".  To be inevitably   
might suppose, but in "all".  To be inevitably   
<lb/>
<lb/>
conformed to it must be inevitably known.
conformed to it must be inevitably known.
<lb/></p>
</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

tas
task as that of settling it between them making them friends again..

I find it a vain thing to seek to guard myself against
the charge of misrepresentation: for <add>I consider a passage,</add> for if I give
according to the best of my judgment I give it the
sense that's due to it. If that sense be absurd: he Preface
may say it is not this : and whatever be that sense
if it be a sense, he may always say it is not
this.

[The Law of Nature. And the Law of Revelation.
and the Law of Nations.

It was "necessary", + + p.44 our Author, is of opinion,
that he should give us this account of them; and
surely there is some appearance of Laws having very good account as it <add>should seemed, we ought</add>
the sight of it, to have of them the first two of them: if as he assures us, no human
Laws are to be suffer'd to contradict these them".
If in short we care if were any human Laws to "in joining" or
even "allowing" us to do any thing forbidden by either
of them, we are bound to transgress that human
Law: supposing always, which is impossible
that a Law which does nothing but as more than to allow
can be transgressed.

[It was necessary we should have a good account of
them: it was also unnecessary that is, there could be no use for it The Will of man's
maker is this Law of Nature: this will "is inevitably
conformed to", not in one here and there a point as you one
might suppose, but in "all". To be inevitably
conformed to it must be inevitably known.



Identifier: | JB/096/054/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

054

Info in main headings field

sect. ii law of nature

Image

002

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / / /

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31058

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in