★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>VITIOUS CONFORMATION-</head> | <head>VITIOUS CONFORMATION-</head> | ||
<p>The Directory part brought in a second time involved with the <lb/> | |||
Sanctional. In this case The Directory is the ordinary form of <lb/> | |||
a Catagorical proposition - then comes the Sanctional in form of <lb/> | |||
an Hypothetical one of which the Directory part repealed over <lb/> | |||
again is the <sic>Anticedent</sic>, & the Sanction itself the consequent.<lb/></p> | |||
<p>Example Directory part Categorical.<lb/> | |||
"Front walls must be coped with either Stone or Tile or <lb/> | |||
"Brick"—[& nothing else]<lb/></p> | |||
<p>Sanction in the proper form<lb/> | |||
— "on penalty of £50."<lb/></p> | |||
<p>Sanction part in the Redundant or Hypothetical form—<lb/> | |||
"and if any such wall be coped with any thing besides Stone <lb/> | |||
"or Tile or Brick [<sic>Anticedent</sic> containing the Directory part—<lb/> | |||
"repealed] The Builder shall forfeit £50"—[Consequent-<lb/> | |||
containing what is properly the Sanction.<lb/></p> | |||
<p>This Example supposes a single Directory part followed immediately <lb/> | |||
by a single Sanctional: But the usual manner in <lb/> | |||
which this vitiosity shews itself is by collecting <add>a number</add> directory part <lb/> in a String i=e. so many as have the same sanction, after <lb/> | |||
which come the Hypothetical Sanctional part with the anticeden<hi rend='superscript'>ts</hi><lb/> | |||
in a string correspondent to that of the Directory parts closed <lb/> | |||
by the Sanction in form of a single universal clause consequent <lb/> | |||
to them all. As if it were (after a number of correspondent <lb/> | |||
directory clauses) "If any Front Wall be coped with any thing <lb/> | |||
besides Stone or Tile or Brick, or if . . . . . or if . . . <lb/> | |||
& so on, the Builder shall forfeit £50."<lb/></p> | |||
<p>Now this is the case with the Builder's Act <add>+</add><note>+12.G.3.73.</note> (among others)<lb/> | |||
which furnished me with this example The 10<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi>. Section is a <lb/> | |||
recapitulation sometimes re-iterating i<del>n</del>dentically sometimes —<lb/> | |||
referring back to almost every thing [but not quite, & there is <lb/> | |||
another mischief,] in the former nine.<lb/></p> | |||
<p>He who proceeds in this manner uses repetition, which begets <lb/> | |||
prolixity: & runs the risk of a variance which begets confusion.<lb/></p> | |||
<head>COMPOS. Stat quâ Stat. Formularies of Enactment. [BR| | ]</head> | |||
<head>E</head> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Click Here To Edit VITIOUS CONFORMATION-
The Directory part brought in a second time involved with the
Sanctional. In this case The Directory is the ordinary form of
a Catagorical proposition - then comes the Sanctional in form of
an Hypothetical one of which the Directory part repealed over
again is the Anticedent, & the Sanction itself the consequent.
Example Directory part Categorical.
"Front walls must be coped with either Stone or Tile or
"Brick"—[& nothing else]
Sanction in the proper form
— "on penalty of £50."
Sanction part in the Redundant or Hypothetical form—
"and if any such wall be coped with any thing besides Stone
"or Tile or Brick [Anticedent containing the Directory part—
"repealed] The Builder shall forfeit £50"—[Consequent-
containing what is properly the Sanction.
This Example supposes a single Directory part followed immediately
by a single Sanctional: But the usual manner in
which this vitiosity shews itself is by collecting a number directory part
in a String i=e. so many as have the same sanction, after
which come the Hypothetical Sanctional part with the anticedents
in a string correspondent to that of the Directory parts closed
by the Sanction in form of a single universal clause consequent
to them all. As if it were (after a number of correspondent
directory clauses) "If any Front Wall be coped with any thing
besides Stone or Tile or Brick, or if . . . . . or if . . .
& so on, the Builder shall forfeit £50."
Now this is the case with the Builder's Act ++12.G.3.73. (among others)
which furnished me with this example The 10th. Section is a
recapitulation sometimes re-iterating indentically sometimes —
referring back to almost every thing [but not quite, & there is
another mischief,] in the former nine.
He who proceeds in this manner uses repetition, which begets
prolixity: & runs the risk of a variance which begets confusion.
COMPOS. Stat quâ Stat. Formularies of Enactment. [BR| | ] E
|
Identifier: | JB/070/084/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
070 |
of laws in general |
||
|
084 |
compos. stat. qua statutes formularies of enactment |
||
|
001 |
vitious conformation |
||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
|||
|
23199 |
|||
