JB/063/139/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/063/139/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- transcription of main text taken from JB/063/139/003. The two additions attached on the left hand side are transcribed and the masked area affected by them noted -->
<head><sic>GEN<hi rend="superscript">L</hi></sic> EXEMPTION ACCIDENT <hi rend="superscript">12</hi></head> <p>The last link in this chain of errors, is a decision <add>of a very worthy Magistrate</add> passed <add><del>originally <gap/></del></add> <del>ordered</del> <add>originally</add> in the hurry of an <add>Assize</add><lb/>
<note>+ <del>too much precipitated</del> &#x2014; &#x2014;&#x2014; &#x2014;</note><lb/>
but confirmed by the <sic>suffrages</sic> of his cooler moments <add><gap/> hours</add> &#x2014; <hi rend="superscript">||</hi><lb/>
<note> || 2 J. Fosters <del><gap/></del> Discourses<lb/>
on the Crown Law p.261</note><lb/>
I will give his own account of<lb/>
it &#x2014; "A Man at the diversion of Cock-throwing at Shrovetide, (<hi rend="underline">which hath <add>long</add><lb/>
prevailed</hi>), missed his Aim; and a Child looking on received a Blow from the Staff <gap/><lb/>
which he <add>soon</add> died. I once in the Circuit ruled it Manslaughter. It is a <add>barbarous</add><lb/>
<note>[A facetious friend <del>by</del> <add>with</add> whom I was once<lb/>
conversing about the discourse observed that<lb/>
&#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014;<lb/>
This was like drowning a dog<lb/>
to kill his Fleas.] </note><lb/>
unmanly custom, frequently productive of great disorders, dangerous to <add>the</add><lb/>
by-standers, &amp; ought to be discouraged." &#x2014; It ought indeed to be discouraged <add>but</add><lb/>
<del>he was much</del> <add>it is to be feared he was</add> mistaken when he fancied <add>supposed</add>, that what was he was doing would <add>could</add> <unclear>discourage</unclear><lb/>
it or that he ought so to discourage it if <del>he</del> could <add>it would</add>. Either there was Law <add>against</add><lb/>
<!-- start of area partially masked by additions -->it or there was not &#x2014; If there was Law, that Law presented a course <add>its own specified <unclear>course</unclear></add><lb/>
be followed for that purpose. If there was none, it was <del> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add> for others &amp; not for him</add> to <unclear>make</unclear><lb/>
one &#x2014; <add> Meanwhile/After all too</add> It is easy to see his decision could contribute or a way to see, his decision could contribute/ not be of any effect to the purpose for which<lb/>
designed it; <add>In the first place, It would not be known &#x2014; [+]</add><lb/>
<!-- all crossed through, see JB/063/1139/002 for attached revision --> <note>[+] It could not be know because<lb/>
(I observe in this place<lb/>
as I might find <unclear>reason</unclear> to observe<lb/>
in a thousand others) <add> the practice of Jurisprudence affords</add> <del>there</del> is no<lb/>
<del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>means of</add> causing it to be so<lb/>
and being a regulation merely<lb/>
<gap/> it could never be<lb/>
guessed at</note> <add>I would stake every thing upon the Issue</add> <del>as indeed he does That an unfor</del> whether on the last Shrove <add>Tuesday</add><lb/>
or on any other Shrove Tuesday since the <del>passing</del> <add> pronouncing</add> of it, of all the Inhabitants<lb/>
of England who might have <add>had</add> formed the design of engaging in this inhumane <add>pastime</add><lb/>
there was a single individual <del>detained by the consideration of it </del> <add>repelled/who took it into consideration./<!-- written underneath --> who thought any thing about the matter. The wonder would have been</add> That a m<gap/> <add>those who [+]</add><lb/>
who meant<del>ing</del> nothing less than to kill his neighbour [<del>should have fallen into that<lb/>
<gap/></del>] should suffer the same punishment as if he had purposely put him <add>to</add><lb/>
death <del>in the heat of a quarrel, is a proposition no ways <gap/> with the</del> <add>is an Idea that would with difficulty occur to any one who had but</add><lb/>
<del>of popular sentiment[s] &amp; which could [have] suggest[ed] itself to no man, who <unclear>had</unclear> <add>would never have suggested nor ever will suggest any</add></del><lb/>
<del>sort be not</del> <add> had considerable practise in</add> the art of <sic>misreasoning</sic> by Rules <add>In the second place it would have</add> It is a punishment that <add>when affixed &amp; <gap/></add> in<lb/>
at least 999 instances out of 1000 attaches <add>can attach</add> in no respect upon the act <add>which</add> also<lb/>
it is levelled: &amp; which taking place only in case of a rare &amp; accidental <unclear>incident</unclear><lb/>
not more connected with <del>that<add>the</add></del> energy in question than with a thousand <unclear>suitably</unclear><lb/>
innocent or laudable energies that might be named, would by reason of its' <add>rarity</add><lb/>
<del>not be thought likely to occur, nor consequently influence the conduct of</del> &#x2014; &#x2014;&#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; <add>never be so strongly in contemplation as to influence man's conduct <del><gap/></del></add> <lb/>
<del>though this artificial <add>forbidding</add> consequence were ever so well known.</del> In plain <unclear>language</unclear> </p>


<!-- start of first attached addition --> <head>EXEMPTIONS ACCIDENT <hi rend="superscript">12</hi> [+] <hi rend="superscript">1</hi></head> <p><note>case in after "Wonder<lb/>
would have been<lb/>
"there was.</note></p>


<p>In the first place <add>every one knows that</add> not the least care is taken to<lb/>
make known these sentences, from <add>by</add> which it is<lb/>
designed that evil customs should be discouraged, to<lb/>
more than 2 or 300 persons <add>or so many more as can hear what passes at a Town-hall </add> whose knowing <add>of</add> them<lb/>
<del>can not be helpin</del> <add>there is no <del>helping</del> avoiding:</add> and if that Magistrate had even <add>entertained</add><lb/>
then a <del>design to publish this among</del> <add>the laudable of giving to the world those <gap/></add><lb/>
among which the <del>History</del> <add>memorial</add> of this transaction<lb/>
is inserted that could add <del><gap/></del> to the number of <lb/>
those who would know of it 8,00 or 10,00 persons<lb/>
at most of a class <del>on</del> <add>in</add> which it is not very usual<lb/>
to meet <add>find</add> with a man <add>with one</add> who has a fancy for this species of diversion.</p>
<!-- start of second attached addition --> <head>EXEMPTIONS ACCIDENT. <hi rend="superscript">12 2</hi></head> <p><add>In the second place</add> Having no connection with any just chain of reasoning<lb/>
nor with any natural train of Sentiment<lb/>
it has nothing which can guide conjecture toward<lb/>
it, nor <add>where it has <hi rend="underline">never</hi>/not been announced</add> <del>fasten it on the memory's of those</del> <!-- written below --> <add><del>except it be it's singularity</del> except it by its' singularity which</add><lb/>
lost among <del>that</del> <add>so</add> many other singularities which the<lb/>
Law affords, <del>nor which <gap/></del> <add> to</add> fasten it in the<lb/>
memory , where it has.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:01, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

GENL EXEMPTION ACCIDENT 12

The last link in this chain of errors, is a decision of a very worthy Magistrate passed originally ordered originally in the hurry of an Assize
+ too much precipitated — —— —
but confirmed by the suffrages of his cooler moments hours||
|| 2 J. Fosters Discourses
on the Crown Law p.261

I will give his own account of
it — "A Man at the diversion of Cock-throwing at Shrovetide, (which hath long
prevailed
), missed his Aim; and a Child looking on received a Blow from the Staff
which he soon died. I once in the Circuit ruled it Manslaughter. It is a barbarous
[A facetious friend by with whom I was once
conversing about the discourse observed that
— — — — — —
This was like drowning a dog
to kill his Fleas.]

unmanly custom, frequently productive of great disorders, dangerous to the
by-standers, & ought to be discouraged." — It ought indeed to be discouraged but
he was much it is to be feared he was mistaken when he fancied supposed, that what was he was doing would could discourage
it or that he ought so to discourage it if he could it would. Either there was Law against
it or there was not — If there was Law, that Law presented a course its own specified course
be followed for that purpose. If there was none, it was for others & not for him to make
one — Meanwhile/After all too It is easy to see his decision could contribute or a way to see, his decision could contribute/ not be of any effect to the purpose for which
designed it; In the first place, It would not be known — [+]
[+] It could not be know because
(I observe in this place
as I might find reason to observe
in a thousand others) the practice of Jurisprudence affords there is no
means of causing it to be so
and being a regulation merely
it could never be
guessed at
I would stake every thing upon the Issue as indeed he does That an unfor whether on the last Shrove Tuesday
or on any other Shrove Tuesday since the passing pronouncing of it, of all the Inhabitants
of England who might have had formed the design of engaging in this inhumane pastime
there was a single individual detained by the consideration of it repelled/who took it into consideration./ who thought any thing about the matter. The wonder would have been That a m those who [+]
who meanting nothing less than to kill his neighbour [should have fallen into that
] should suffer the same punishment as if he had purposely put him to
death in the heat of a quarrel, is a proposition no ways with the is an Idea that would with difficulty occur to any one who had but
of popular sentiment[s] & which could [have] suggest[ed] itself to no man, who had would never have suggested nor ever will suggest any
sort be not had considerable practise in the art of misreasoning by Rules In the second place it would have It is a punishment that when affixed & in
at least 999 instances out of 1000 attaches can attach in no respect upon the act which also
it is levelled: & which taking place only in case of a rare & accidental incident
not more connected with thatthe energy in question than with a thousand suitably
innocent or laudable energies that might be named, would by reason of its' rarity
not be thought likely to occur, nor consequently influence the conduct of — —— — — never be so strongly in contemplation as to influence man's conduct
though this artificial forbidding consequence were ever so well known. In plain language

EXEMPTIONS ACCIDENT 12 [+] 1

case in after "Wonder
would have been
"there was.

In the first place every one knows that not the least care is taken to
make known these sentences, from by which it is
designed that evil customs should be discouraged, to
more than 2 or 300 persons or so many more as can hear what passes at a Town-hall whose knowing of them
can not be helpin there is no helping avoiding: and if that Magistrate had even entertained
then a design to publish this among the laudable of giving to the world those
among which the History memorial of this transaction
is inserted that could add to the number of
those who would know of it 8,00 or 10,00 persons
at most of a class on in which it is not very usual
to meet find with a man with one who has a fancy for this species of diversion.

EXEMPTIONS ACCIDENT. 12 2

In the second place Having no connection with any just chain of reasoning
nor with any natural train of Sentiment
it has nothing which can guide conjecture toward
it, nor where it has never/not been announced fasten it on the memory's of those except it be it's singularity except it by its' singularity which
lost among that so many other singularities which the
Law affords, nor which to fasten it in the
memory , where it has.



Identifier: | JB/063/139/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

063

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

139

Info in main headings field

genl exemption accident

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20328

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in