JB/063/165/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/063/165/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>EXEMPTIONS NECESSITY <unclear>3</unclear></head> <p>apparent: the other, that <add>Sir</add> since <add>in</add> a state of nature no one is in subjection to another <add>it</add>"<lb/>"would be unreasonable to screen an offender from the punishment due to <unclear>natural</unclear>"<lb/>"crimes by the refinements &amp; subordinations of civil Society." I profess myself <add>utterly</add><lb/>unable to comprehend what State of Nature it is that the Author means if <unclear>this</unclear> <add>be</add><lb/>the case in <add>under</add> it: sure I am that this can never <add>be</add> have been the case in any <add>state</add><lb/><note>It must have been some state<lb/> of which men dream; not any<lb/> which they ever saw</note><lb/>of Human Nature in which at least so long as there have been Parents &amp; <add>Children</add><lb/>there must have been subjection. <add> one must have been in subjection</add> &#x2014; In point of fact we learn <add><gap/></add> that amongst <add>nations</add><lb/><note>Of which German commentators<lb/> have dreamt upon a <add>cobweb</add> pillow<lb/>of <add>stuffed with</add> scholastic Jurisprudence &amp;<lb/>theology</note><lb/> as <del>either</del> have been formerly or now are in a state of Nature (if that expression <add>is to</add><lb/> have any meaning) a State in which men not being governed by Laws, govern <add>themselves</add><lb/>by customs that <add>very</add> subjection <add>in question that of Wife to Husband</add> is much more <unclear>entire</unclear> than in civilised ones. Witness the<lb/>Savages of America &#x2014; witness even all Asia in ancient times; witness even all <add>Asia in</add><lb/>our own &#x2014; <add>Witness all the world except a part of Europe</add> It being a general rule that the Bonds of domestic union are ever the<lb/> most tight, where those of political are most loose. In Large <add>&amp; uncultivated</add> nations the Women <add>are</add> <lb/>strictly slaves: in ignorant but luxurious they are little better. The unlimited Despotism <add>which</add><lb/> Nature has given to Man over Woman being on these but little on those not <add>all</add> <lb/> <sic>asswaged</sic> by moral <hi rend="superscript">4</hi> considerations <hi rend="superscript">5</hi> or <hi rend="superscript">3</hi> political <hi rend="superscript">1</hi> establishments <hi rend="superscript">2</hi>: † <!-- at the bottom of the margin --><note>† I know that according to Tacitus a<lb/> Woman among the <add>some</add> Germans was worshipped<lb/> as a kind of Pope or Grand Lama<lb/> but supposition breaks through every<lb/> uniformity I know that an <del>extraordinary</del> <add>very strong</add> <!-- continues in to main text area --> respect for the fix was <del>frequent</del> <add> ordinary even</add> in the very rude ages of our history; but the paying it or not was just <add>it happened</add> <lb/>at the pleasure of the Male Sex &#x2014; &#x2014; &amp; c. &amp; their situation <add>when at the best</add> was precisely that of a Slave under a kind Master.</note> the situation <add>condition</add> of the <unclear>memorable</unclear><lb/> part <add>half</add> of the Human species having been ordinarily meliorated <add>improved</add> in proportion<lb/>advancement of [politeness &amp;] civilization &#x2014; Under <add>to return to</add> our own Law the expeditious <add>sort-term remedy</add><lb/> for Wives against the cruelty of Husbands is but of late date <add><sic>tho'</sic> not established for that peculiar purpose </add> [viz: the securing<lb/> Peace] Before which if the Laws in their state of weakness could afford but a <unclear>spurious</unclear><lb/> protection <del>to</del> against occasional <add>manifest</add> &amp; extrinsic injuries, still less could they afford<lb/>any adequate assurance against constant <add>secret</add> &amp; domestic ones. The provision of Officers<lb/>of the Law, <del> or rather</del> <add>that is</add> the practise of the Lawyers <add>Judges</add> in this behalf was <del>not</del> at the <unclear>time</unclear><lb/>it commenced either not irrational or nor so irrational as it may now appear.</p> <p><note><add>If this Law which</add> gives a <gap/> to an extensive denomination<lb/> of persons to <sic>committ</sic> certain<lb/> crimes in certain company with<lb/>impunity, has been productive of no<lb/>signal inconvenience.</note></p> <p><note>The reason is that clogged with distinctions<lb/> &amp; modifications this provision is become<lb/> too complex to engrave <add>attach</add> itself upon<lb/>the memory &amp; influence the conduct<lb/> of the people's want of notoriety being<lb/> here as <del>it is in every instance</del> <add>elsewhere being advantageous</add><lb/>to <add>under</add> a bad Law, as surely as it<lb/>is destructive to the effect <add>efficacy</add> of a good<lb/> one [(in a note) I mean <del><gap/></del> <add> such</add> a Law<lb/>[so bad] as to come under the same<lb/> case of inexpediency]</note></p> <p><add>Then</add> When the Idea of a public was little prevalent; when to rob &amp; to pilfer was more <unclear>honourable</unclear><lb/> than dishonourable even to persons in an elevated rank of life; when fidelity to the connection<lb/> of blood &amp; private friendship was the only fidelity <add>except that of a relative to his chieftain </add> much practised or regarded: &amp; <add>when</add><lb/>it was in the power of a Husband to extort <add>the most irrational</add> <sic>compliances</sic> from a wife <add>by exertions of cruelty or at</add> without any <lb/>least without any present redress.</p>
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:01, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

EXEMPTIONS NECESSITY 3

apparent: the other, that Sir since in a state of nature no one is in subjection to another it"
"would be unreasonable to screen an offender from the punishment due to natural"
"crimes by the refinements & subordinations of civil Society." I profess myself utterly
unable to comprehend what State of Nature it is that the Author means if this be
the case in under it: sure I am that this can never be have been the case in any state
It must have been some state
of which men dream; not any
which they ever saw

of Human Nature in which at least so long as there have been Parents & Children
there must have been subjection. one must have been in subjection — In point of fact we learn that amongst nations
Of which German commentators
have dreamt upon a cobweb pillow
of stuffed with scholastic Jurisprudence &
theology

as either have been formerly or now are in a state of Nature (if that expression is to
have any meaning) a State in which men not being governed by Laws, govern themselves
by customs that very subjection in question that of Wife to Husband is much more entire than in civilised ones. Witness the
Savages of America — witness even all Asia in ancient times; witness even all Asia in
our own — Witness all the world except a part of Europe It being a general rule that the Bonds of domestic union are ever the
most tight, where those of political are most loose. In Large & uncultivated nations the Women are
strictly slaves: in ignorant but luxurious they are little better. The unlimited Despotism which
Nature has given to Man over Woman being on these but little on those not all
asswaged by moral 4 considerations 5 or 3 political 1 establishments 2: † † I know that according to Tacitus a
Woman among the some Germans was worshipped
as a kind of Pope or Grand Lama
but supposition breaks through every
uniformity I know that an extraordinary very strong respect for the fix was frequent ordinary even in the very rude ages of our history; but the paying it or not was just it happened
at the pleasure of the Male Sex — — & c. & their situation when at the best was precisely that of a Slave under a kind Master.
the situation condition of the memorable
part half of the Human species having been ordinarily meliorated improved in proportion
advancement of [politeness &] civilization — Under to return to our own Law the expeditious sort-term remedy
for Wives against the cruelty of Husbands is but of late date tho' not established for that peculiar purpose [viz: the securing
Peace] Before which if the Laws in their state of weakness could afford but a spurious
protection to against occasional manifest & extrinsic injuries, still less could they afford
any adequate assurance against constant secret & domestic ones. The provision of Officers
of the Law, or rather that is the practise of the Lawyers Judges in this behalf was not at the time
it commenced either not irrational or nor so irrational as it may now appear.

If this Law which gives a to an extensive denomination
of persons to committ certain
crimes in certain company with
impunity, has been productive of no
signal inconvenience.

The reason is that clogged with distinctions
& modifications this provision is become
too complex to engrave attach itself upon
the memory & influence the conduct
of the people's want of notoriety being
here as it is in every instance elsewhere being advantageous
to under a bad Law, as surely as it
is destructive to the effect efficacy of a good
one [(in a note) I mean such a Law
[so bad] as to come under the same
case of inexpediency]

Then When the Idea of a public was little prevalent; when to rob & to pilfer was more honourable
than dishonourable even to persons in an elevated rank of life; when fidelity to the connection
of blood & private friendship was the only fidelity except that of a relative to his chieftain much practised or regarded: & when
it was in the power of a Husband to extort the most irrational compliances from a wife by exertions of cruelty or at without any
least without any present redress.



Identifier: | JB/063/165/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

063

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

165

Info in main headings field

exemptions necessity

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20354

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in