★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
<add>In the case of the Excise, though the words</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> put together would not</del><lb/> | <add>In the case of the Excise, though the words</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> put together would not</del><lb/> | ||
<add>employed by the Act [<del>Ch</del> 12 C2.c.24. | <add>employed by the Act [<del>Ch</del> 12 C2.c.24.§.46] <del>for all</del> in </add> <del>be sufficient to warrant the adopting of <gap/> the</del><lb/> | ||
<add>the description of the district within which the Head Office</add> <del>present case a mode of description</del><add><del><gap/></del></add> <del>so vague</del><lb/> | <add>the description of the district within which the Head Office</add> <del>present case a mode of description</del> <add><del><gap/></del></add> <del>so vague</del><lb/> | ||
<add>shall be | <add>shall be situated are "<hi rend="underline">in the City of London or within</hi></add> <del>or that of a <gap/> without assistance <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <lb/> | ||
<add>"<hi rend="underline">ten miles thereof</hi>" (a circle without a centre) those</add><del>and without any distinguishable in <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/> | <add>"<hi rend="underline">ten miles thereof</hi>" (a circle without a centre) those</add><del>and without any distinguishable in <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
<add>by which<add>[+]</add></add><add>the limits are marked out <del>in the same Statute</del></add><del>centre or circumference. The mode of description</del> <note><add>[+]</add> in the same Statute [ | <add>by which <add>[+]</add></add> <add>the limits are marked out <del>in the same Statute</del></add> <del>centre or circumference. The mode of description</del> <note><add>[+]</add> in the same Statute [§.48.]</note><lb/> | ||
<add>with a view to local authority and jurisdiction, are</add> <del>here adopted Using Even in these cases it</del><lb/> | <add>with a view to local authority and jurisdiction, are</add> <del>here adopted Using Even in these cases it</del><lb/> | ||
<add><del | <add><del>marked out upon</del> <add>expressive of</add></add> <add>the same plan of demarcation as</add> <del>were easy to show that the mode here adopted</del><lb/> | ||
<add>that which is <hi rend="underline">here</hi> proposed to be adopted — "<hi rend="underline">All parts</hi></add><del>adopted have been the preferable ones, <gap/></del><lb/> | <add>that which is <hi rend="underline">here</hi> proposed to be adopted — "<hi rend="underline">All parts</hi></add> <del>adopted have been the preferable ones, <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
<add>of the Cities of London and Westminster, with the Borough</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> only propose</del><add><del><gap/></del></add> <del>any in between the present</del><lb/> | <add>of the Cities of London and Westminster, with the Borough</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> only propose</del><add><del><gap/></del></add> <del>any in between the present</del><lb/> | ||
<add>of Southwark, and the several Suburbs thereof —"</add> <del><gap/> the <gap/> of <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/> | <add>of Southwark, and the several Suburbs thereof —"</add> <del><gap/> the <gap/> of <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<del>for provision <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> either</del><lb/> | <del>for provision <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> either</del><lb/> | ||
<del>of these two other ones</del></p> | <del>of these two other ones</del></p> | ||
<p><del>True it is th</del> It is <del>indeed</del> perhaps as uncommon<lb/> | <p><del>True it is th</del> It is <del>indeed</del> perhaps as uncommon<lb/> | ||
case for the same house to be part in<lb/> | case for the same house to be part in<lb/> | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
and the case is provided for in a<lb/> | and the case is provided for in a<lb/> | ||
subsequent clause. See further note [ ] to the<lb/> | subsequent clause. See further note [ ] to the<lb/> | ||
word [ | word [<hi rend="underline">thereabouts</hi>]</p> | ||
<p>It is an obvious question - why make<lb/> | <p>It is an obvious question - why make<lb/> | ||
the rate of duty double in the London District?<lb/> | the rate of duty double in the London District?<lb/> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 36: | ||
in and in the neighbourhood of the metropolis<lb/> | in and in the neighbourhood of the metropolis<lb/> | ||
the <del>scale of dealing</del> <hi rend="underline">field for dealings</hi> of the sort in<lb/> | the <del>scale of dealing</del> <hi rend="underline">field for dealings</hi> of the sort in<lb/> | ||
question, and <del> | question, and <del>unagreeable</del> thereon the <hi rend="underline">scale of dealing</hi><lb/> | ||
is so much more <del>exte</del> extensive than<add>even</add> in the<lb/> | is so much more <del>exte</del> extensive than <add>even</add> in the<lb/> | ||
largest country towns. The Royal Dock Yards afford<lb/> | largest country towns. The Royal Dock Yards afford<lb/> | ||
an equally obvious exception to the general<add>rule</add></p><pb/> | an equally obvious exception to the general <add>rule</add></p><pb/> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
In the case of the Excise, though the words put together would not
employed by the Act [Ch 12 C2.c.24.§.46] for all in be sufficient to warrant the adopting of the
the description of the district within which the Head Office present case a mode of description so vague
shall be situated are "in the City of London or within or that of a without assistance
"ten miles thereof" (a circle without a centre) thoseand without any distinguishable in
by which <add>[+]</add> the limits are marked out in the same Statute centre or circumference. The mode of description [+] in the same Statute [§.48.]
with a view to local authority and jurisdiction, are here adopted Using Even in these cases it
marked out upon <add>expressive of</add> the same plan of demarcation as were easy to show that the mode here adopted
that which is here proposed to be adopted — "All parts adopted have been the preferable ones,
of the Cities of London and Westminster, with the Borough only propose any in between the present
of Southwark, and the several Suburbs thereof —" the of
it to each he is
single or double under one authority
office of the Provid in whose house
it will be benefit
authority such a demand
for provision either
of these two other ones
True it is th It is indeed perhaps as uncommon
case for the same house to be part in
one parish and part in another: but the boundaries
of the two Parishes are not the less determinate;
and the case is provided for in a
subsequent clause. See further note [ ] to the
word [thereabouts]
It is an obvious question - why make
the rate of duty double in the London District?
but the answer is little less obvious: viz: because
in and in the neighbourhood of the metropolis
the scale of dealing field for dealings of the sort in
question, and unagreeable thereon the scale of dealing
is so much more exte extensive than even in the
largest country towns. The Royal Dock Yards afford
an equally obvious exception to the general rule
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/150/437/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
4 continued, 5 |
|||
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
437 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d2 / f9 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
g & ep 1794 |
||
|
fr3 |
|||
|
1794 |
|||
|
50658 |
|||
