JB/120/024/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/120/024/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/120/024/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/120/024/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>Before A</head> <note>5 Connect<hi rend="superscript">g</hi> Observ<hi rend="superscript">n</hi></note><lb/>
<head>§.3 The Establishsment betrayed to L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Belgrave</head>
<p>without the Salisbury Estate would have enabled me to give it &#x2014;)<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Boodle notwithstanding so important and favourable a change<lb/>
of circumstances, found Lord Belgrave still inflexible. What,<lb/>
under this fresh disappointment, could M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Boodle say to me?<lb/>
By what explanation could he make the refusal credible? Was<lb/>
it to be represented to me as the choice and determination of<lb/>
his Noble principal to have my Prisoners to shake hands<lb/>
with him and his Lady from their Windows? In a word<lb/>
for saving the occupier of that house from the otherwise inevitable<lb/>
reputation of insanity &#x2014; (and I took care so to put it<lb/>
to him) there was but one possible expedient, which was, to<lb/>
confess how it happened: &#x2014; Lord Belgrave had applied for a <lb/>
promise that the land (though now perhaps already purchased <lb/>
should never be put to that its only lawful use: he had<lb/>
applied &#x2014; and he had succeeded. &#x2014; The 20<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of February 1800<lb/>
was the day on which I received from M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Boodle a letter<lb/>
written in terms of ambiguous delicacy, to convey my<lb/>
conception the unpleasant news. The 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> of March 1800 was<lb/>
the day when upon a visit of mine the to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Boodle with<lb/>
a letter for him in my hand in the event of his not<lb/>
being at home, that letter of his was interpreted as written<lb/>
in that view &#x2014; the the intelligence confirmed to me. &#x2014;</p>
<note>7<lb/>
J.B. informed by<lb/>
Boodle that L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/>
Belgrave had<lb/>
applied for a<lb/>
promise that the<lb/>
Salisbury Estate<lb/>
should never be<lb/>
employed &amp; had<lb/>
succeeded.</note>
<p>The correspondence is in my possession: &amp; certainly on <lb/>
my own part I cannot have the smallest objection to the<lb/>
publication of it: &#x2014; if I spare your Lordship the trouble of it<lb/>
for the present it is merely as not being necessary to the<lb/>
present purpose &#x2014;</p>
<note>8<lb/>
Correspondence with<lb/>
Boodle in J.B<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> possession<lb/>
not published because <lb/>
not necessary.</note>
<p>Let me not be misconceived. In M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Boodle, besides an <lb/>
honourable man, I found a discreet man: his taste was<lb/>
beyond expression a delicate and    one. So much as was<lb/>
altogether unavoidable, so much he did say to me: &#x2014; more I<lb/>
could not expect or ask from him.  What he did not say <add>was</add></p>
<note>9<lb/>
Eulogium on Boodle<lb/>
he gave J.B. to understand<lb/>
that the assurance<lb/>
L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Belgrave had<lb/>
obtained <gap/><lb/>
satisfactory &#x2014;</note>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:29, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit Before A 5 Connectg Observn
§.3 The Establishsment betrayed to Ld Belgrave

without the Salisbury Estate would have enabled me to give it —)
Mr Boodle notwithstanding so important and favourable a change
of circumstances, found Lord Belgrave still inflexible. What,
under this fresh disappointment, could Mr Boodle say to me?
By what explanation could he make the refusal credible? Was
it to be represented to me as the choice and determination of
his Noble principal to have my Prisoners to shake hands
with him and his Lady from their Windows? In a word
for saving the occupier of that house from the otherwise inevitable
reputation of insanity — (and I took care so to put it
to him) there was but one possible expedient, which was, to
confess how it happened: — Lord Belgrave had applied for a
promise that the land (though now perhaps already purchased
should never be put to that its only lawful use: he had
applied — and he had succeeded. — The 20th of February 1800
was the day on which I received from Mr Boodle a letter
written in terms of ambiguous delicacy, to convey my
conception the unpleasant news. The 1st of March 1800 was
the day when upon a visit of mine the to Mr Boodle with
a letter for him in my hand in the event of his not
being at home, that letter of his was interpreted as written
in that view — the the intelligence confirmed to me. —

7
J.B. informed by
Boodle that Ld
Belgrave had
applied for a
promise that the
Salisbury Estate
should never be
employed & had
succeeded.

The correspondence is in my possession: & certainly on
my own part I cannot have the smallest objection to the
publication of it: — if I spare your Lordship the trouble of it
for the present it is merely as not being necessary to the
present purpose —

8
Correspondence with
Boodle in J.Bs possession
not published because
not necessary.

Let me not be misconceived. In Mr Boodle, besides an
honourable man, I found a discreet man: his taste was
beyond expression a delicate and one. So much as was
altogether unavoidable, so much he did say to me: — more I
could not expect or ask from him. What he did not say was

9
Eulogium on Boodle
he gave J.B. to understand
that the assurance
Ld Belgrave had
obtained
satisfactory —





Identifier: | JB/120/024/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-9

Box

120

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

024

Info in main headings field

the establishment betrayed to ld belgrave

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39850

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in