JB/123/026/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/123/026/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>+ 3<lb/>Tothill<lb/> <note>Only Chance</note></p> <p>Were this waste to be divided, like <del>another</del> <add>other/<del>waste <gap/></del></add><lb/>waste, among all the Commoners, in proportion<lb/>to their <add>respective</add> quantities of interest <del> possessed by each, (that</del><lb/><del>is</del> (in the present instance in equal shares)<lb/>the quantity of divisible land, compared with the<lb/>number of the sharers, would have afford to each<lb/><add>of them</add> a spot big enough to stretch himself upon: and<lb/>in that case the very expense of fencing <add>to say nothing of draining)</add> would<lb/>of itself be <add>more than</add> sufficient to eat up the <add>whole</add> value of<lb/><del>each lot</del> the subject to be divided. <!-- (a) in pencil --> <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> <del>And</del> <add> But,</add> upon<lb/><del>this</del> <add>such a</add> plan of division, the <add>particular</add> interests <del>interests</del><lb/>just spoken of would be more <sic>compleatly</sic> and<lb/>irremediably satisfied, than upon the plan here<lb/>proposed.  Those to whom it is now of the most<lb/>value would have no <add>greater</add> share than <del>those to whom it is now</del> <add>any one of the thousands to whom, in its present state it is</add> of no value at all.<lb/> <add>Another</add></p> <!-- line in red ink across the page --> <p>Note<lb/><hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> Number of acres remaining after <del>an</del><lb/>allowance made <del><add>for road</add> of the necessary quantity</del><lb/>for roads, and an allotment of 10 or<lb/>11 acres clear for the Westminster Scholars, about 40<lb/><sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> of <del>sharers</del> <add>Inhabitants</add> in <sic>S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>.</sic> Margarets 12000, in<lb/><sic>S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>.</sic> John's 8000  <sic>S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>.</sic> John's appointing 20 out<lb/>of the <add>50</add> Joint Vestrymen to 30 of <sic>S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>.</sic> Margarets &#x2014;<lb/>total 20000 &#x2014; divided by 5 to obtain<lb/>the number of <del>Householders</del> Householder 4000</p> <p>(25)</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:50, 21 September 2020

Click Here To Edit

+ 3
Tothill
Only Chance

Were this waste to be divided, like another other/waste
waste, among all the Commoners, in proportion
to their respective quantities of interest possessed by each, (that
is (in the present instance in equal shares)
the quantity of divisible land, compared with the
number of the sharers, would have afford to each
of them a spot big enough to stretch himself upon: and
in that case the very expense of fencing to say nothing of draining) would
of itself be more than sufficient to eat up the whole value of
each lot the subject to be divided. (a) And But, upon
this such a plan of division, the particular interests interests
just spoken of would be more compleatly and
irremediably satisfied, than upon the plan here
proposed. Those to whom it is now of the most
value would have no greater share than those to whom it is now any one of the thousands to whom, in its present state it is of no value at all.
Another

Note
(a) Number of acres remaining after an
allowance made for road of the necessary quantity
for roads, and an allotment of 10 or
11 acres clear for the Westminster Scholars, about 40
No of sharers Inhabitants in St. Margarets 12000, in
St. John's 8000 St. John's appointing 20 out
of the 50 Joint Vestrymen to 30 of St. Margarets —
total 20000 — divided by 5 to obtain
the number of Householders Householder 4000

(25)




Identifier: | JB/123/026/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 123.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

123

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

026

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c25 / d3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

41452

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in