JB/050/006/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/006/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/006/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/006/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head>PROCEDURE - <add>Summary</add> View.  Conviction on &#x2014; State of the question concerning the expediency of allowing.</head>
<p>Of all modes of judiciary demonstration, <unclear>Vices</unclear><add>[+]</add> <note><add>{+]</add> <sic>consider'd</sic> merely with reference to the magistrate himself as a means of information</note>
<lb/>
ie: of the Magistrate is manifestly the most
<lb/>
<sic>compleat</sic> &#x2014;  In this case the several characters
<lb/>
of Prosecutor Witness and Judge are visited
<lb/>
in his single person.  characters such, that it
<lb/>
<del>for</del> owing entirely to the imperfection of the
<lb/>
human faculties that they are ever <del>separated</del> <add>permitted</add>
<lb/>
in separation: characters which united in beings
<lb/>
such as are by accident, are <add>by essence</add> united in the
<lb/>
<sic>allperfect</sic> judge. [in virtue of] <add>by</add> his essence.
<lb/></p>
<p><note>distribution</note>  At every separation of characters <add>functions</add> thus necessary
<lb/>
to concur towards the constatement of the fact
<lb/>
in question, a fresh degree of uncertainty is produced.
<lb/></p>
<p>It is only because he cannot <add>always</add> see every thing
<lb/>
with his own eyes, that the Magistrate is permitted
<lb/>
to see any thing with the eyes of others.
<lb/>
But the enlightening of the Magistrate is not
<lb/>
the <add>sole</add> end of the formalities of Procedure.  It &#x2014;
<lb/>
scarcely is in the Jurisprudence of any civilized
<!-- horizontal line (end of first quarter) -->
<pb/>
<add>polished</add> nation; least of all is it in our's.
<lb/>
The applying<add>+</add> <note><add>+</add> punishing &#x2014; administering, affording</note> a check to the corrupt affections
<lb/>
which may influence every judge, as they
<lb/>
may every man &#x2014; by holding up the same
<lb/>
lights<add>//</add><!-- vertical parallel lines, not forward-slashes --> <note>//<!-- pair of parallel lines --> determinatives</note> to <del>others</del> <add>- number</add> of persons besides, that are
<lb/>
presented to the judge <add>they are</add> thus enabled to judge from
<lb/>
the force <add>sentiment</add> of those determinatives upon themselves
<lb/>
and from that of their own conclusion in consequence,
<lb/>
whether it was by the same determinatives
<lb/>
that <del>the</del> <add>has</add> conclusion was governed &#x2014; (as it
<lb/>
ought to be) or by other sinister ones, irrevelant <add>irrelative</add>
<lb/>
to the merits.
<lb/></p>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<p>According to an absurd doctrine laid down in
<lb/>
12 Mod. 688.  An Act of Parliament <del>proscribing</del> <add>allowing
<lb/>
of</add> Conviction on View should <add>is</add> be void:
<lb/>
for an Act of Parliament is void says the
<lb/>
Court, that, makes the same person both Judge
<lb/>
and party.
<lb/></p>
<pb/>
<p>There is always therefore a <del>certain</del> <add><del>contingent</del></add> <del>danger</del> <add>contingent mischief in the <add>danger</add> <del>in a certain degree</del></add> of
<lb/>
undue punishment (not of undue discharge <add>undue impunity</add>)
<lb/>
for acquittal in view, has in no instance that
<lb/>
I ever heard of been appointed <add>+</add> <note>+ is a thing I suppose, unknown.</note>) from <del>[</del> the [<gap/>
<lb/>
of these formalities and] aggregating of this distinct
<lb/>
functions to that of the Judge.
<lb/></p>
<p>There is on the other hand also a contingent evil
<lb/>
in the danger of undue impunity from the want
<lb/>
of their being thus aggregated.
<lb/></p>
<p>Now of these 2 evils the l<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> is to the second, as the
<lb/>
<del>number</del> <add>pain</add> <del>resulting from the number of</del> <add>in the 3 stages of <sic>it's</sic> progress through</add>
<lb/>
the community, the pain <del>I say of</del> <add>produced I say <add>in the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> case</add> by</add> an instance
<lb/>
of undue punishment <add>for the offence</add>, multiplied by the <del>number
<lb/>
of instances in which it may be reported
<lb/>
&amp; that product</del> by the chances for <sic>it's</sic> being
<lb/>
repeated, is to the pain produced by an
<lb/>
instance of the offence itself, multiplied by the
<lb/>
difference between the chances against <sic>it's</sic> being
<lb/>
committed when prosecuted in this summary
<lb/>
way, &amp; when <add>only</add> in the common one. <note>Upon this state of the question</note>
<lb/></p>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<pb/>
<p>They who think the <del>first danger the greatest</del> <add>pain if pain within</add> a given
<lb/>
period in the first case <note>depending upon <del>this</del> <add>a given</add> <del><gap/></del><!-- insert here?, or prior to the first word in this note: 'depending' (and therefore added from below)? --> offence <del>in question</del> <add>together</add> with its punishment</note>, has been or could be
<lb/>
greater than in the second, must be of opinion
<lb/>
that Conviction on View ought not to be <sic>allowd</sic>
<lb/>
of for that offence &#x2014; they who think the contrary
<lb/>
must be of opinion that it ought.
<lb/></p>
<head>PROCEDURE <add>Summary</add> View conviction on &#x2014; State of the question concern-|<!-- vertical line, not forward-slash --> [-ing the expediency of allowing.</head>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:54, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


PROCEDURE - Summary View. Conviction on — State of the question concerning the expediency of allowing.

Of all modes of judiciary demonstration, Vices[+] {+] consider'd merely with reference to the magistrate himself as a means of information
ie: of the Magistrate is manifestly the most
compleat — In this case the several characters
of Prosecutor Witness and Judge are visited
in his single person. characters such, that it
for owing entirely to the imperfection of the
human faculties that they are ever separated permitted
in separation: characters which united in beings
such as are by accident, are by essence united in the
allperfect judge. [in virtue of] by his essence.

distribution At every separation of characters functions thus necessary
to concur towards the constatement of the fact
in question, a fresh degree of uncertainty is produced.

It is only because he cannot always see every thing
with his own eyes, that the Magistrate is permitted
to see any thing with the eyes of others.
But the enlightening of the Magistrate is not
the sole end of the formalities of Procedure. It —
scarcely is in the Jurisprudence of any civilized
---page break---
polished nation; least of all is it in our's.
The applying+ + punishing — administering, affording a check to the corrupt affections
which may influence every judge, as they
may every man — by holding up the same
lights// // determinatives to others - number of persons besides, that are
presented to the judge they are thus enabled to judge from
the force sentiment of those determinatives upon themselves
and from that of their own conclusion in consequence,
whether it was by the same determinatives
that the has conclusion was governed — (as it
ought to be) or by other sinister ones, irrevelant irrelative
to the merits.


According to an absurd doctrine laid down in
12 Mod. 688. An Act of Parliament proscribing allowing
of
Conviction on View should is be void:
for an Act of Parliament is void says the
Court, that, makes the same person both Judge
and party.


---page break---

There is always therefore a certain contingent danger contingent mischief in the <add>danger in a certain degree</add> of
undue punishment (not of undue discharge undue impunity)
for acquittal in view, has in no instance that
I ever heard of been appointed + + is a thing I suppose, unknown.) from [ the [
of these formalities and] aggregating of this distinct
functions to that of the Judge.

There is on the other hand also a contingent evil
in the danger of undue impunity from the want
of their being thus aggregated.

Now of these 2 evils the lst is to the second, as the
number pain resulting from the number of in the 3 stages of it's progress through
the community, the pain I say of produced I say <add>in the 1st case by</add> an instance
of undue punishment for the offence, multiplied by the number
of instances in which it may be reported
& that product
by the chances for it's being
repeated, is to the pain produced by an
instance of the offence itself, multiplied by the
difference between the chances against it's being
committed when prosecuted in this summary
way, & when only in the common one. Upon this state of the question


---page break---

They who think the first danger the greatest pain if pain within a given
period in the first case depending upon this a given offence in question together with its punishment, has been or could be
greater than in the second, must be of opinion
that Conviction on View ought not to be allowd
of for that offence — they who think the contrary
must be of opinion that it ought.

PROCEDURE Summary View conviction on — State of the question concern-| [-ing the expediency of allowing.



Identifier: | JB/050/006/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

006

Info in main headings field

procedure summary view conviction on - state of the questions concerning the expediency of allowing

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15997

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in