JB/034/202/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/202/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1823. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 15 <gap/> Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.22</head>
<head>1823. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 15 Seen Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.22</head>
<head><del>Constitutional Code</del> <add>Procedure.</add> 1. Enactive Part <note>Ch. Quasi <del>Jury</del> Trial</note></head><lb/>
<head><del>Constitutional Code</del> <add>Procedure.</add> 1. Enactive Part <note>Ch. Quasi <del>Jury</del> Trial</note></head><lb/>
<note>5 <del><gap/> of L<gap/></del></note><lb/>
<note>5 <del><gap/> of L<gap/></del></note><lb/>


<p>Art: On the <unclear>occasion</unclear> of the recapitulatory examination<lb/>
<p>Art: On the <unclear>occasion</unclear> of the recapitulatory examination<lb/>
all evi<gap/> which <del>without being <gap/> is</del> has been merely indication<lb/>
all evidence which <del>without being <gap/> is</del> has been merely indicative<lb/>
and not appropriate will of course be omitted: that is<lb/>
and not appropriate will of course be omitted: that is<lb/>
to say the in<gap/>dent by when it was exhibited will not<lb/>
to say the <unclear>indevident</unclear> by whom it was exhibited will not<lb/>
in this occasion be examined: unless pretence <del>it <gap/>
in this occasion be examined: unless pretence <del>it <unclear>stand</unclear>
</del><lb/>
</del><lb/>
such examination should prove necessary to the purpose of<lb/>
such examination should prove necessary to the purpose of<lb/>
corroboating or informing the <gap/> of him when <add>evidence</add>taking<lb/>
corroborating or informing the testimony of him when <add>evidence</add> <unclear>talking</unclear><lb/>
laid been stated as being <add>relevant and</add> appropriate evidence, as if Occl<gap/><lb/>
had been stated as being <add>relevant and</add> appropriate evidence, as if <gap/><lb/>
though stated by Auditors as having been present it<lb/>
though stated by Auditors as having been present in<lb/>
the Occasio in question <del>should</del> and upon the original  examination<lb/>
the Occasion in question <del>should</del> and upon the original  examination<lb/>
admitted his having been so, should on the recapitulatory<lb/>
admitted his having been so, should on the recapitulatory<lb/>
examination <unclear>deny</unclear> his having been so: in this<lb/>
examination <unclear>deny</unclear> his having been so: in this<lb/>
case it might be of use that Auditor should be forthcoming<lb/>
case it might be of use that Auditor should be forthcoming<lb/>
for the purpose of being confronted with him, that so<lb/>
for the purpose of being confronted with him, that so<lb/>
by means <add>with the help</add> of <del>the</del> mutual int<gap/>pation the truth of the<lb/>
by means <add>with the help</add> of <del>the</del> mutual <unclear>interrogation</unclear> the truth of the<lb/>
matter might<add>may</add> be brought to light</p>
matter might <add>may</add> be brought to light</p>


<p>Art. 23 On a day in which there is no recapitulatory<lb/>
<p>Art. 23 On a day in which there is no recapitulatory<lb/>
examination on the <unclear>prospect</unclear>, the Quasi-Jury will add itself to the <lb/>
examination on the <unclear>prospect</unclear>, the Quasi-Jury will add itself to the <lb/>
company of Sponateous Visitors, as per Ch. XV: but will occupy<lb/>
company of Spontaneous Visitors, as per Ch. XV: but will occupy<lb/>
its appropriate seat.</p>
its appropriate seat.</p>


Line 38: Line 38:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:45, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1823. Octr. 15 Seen Decr.22 Constitutional Code Procedure. 1. Enactive Part Ch. Quasi Jury Trial
5 of L

Art: On the occasion of the recapitulatory examination
all evidence which without being is has been merely indicative
and not appropriate will of course be omitted: that is
to say the indevident by whom it was exhibited will not
in this occasion be examined: unless pretence it stand
such examination should prove necessary to the purpose of
corroborating or informing the testimony of him when evidence talking
had been stated as being relevant and appropriate evidence, as if
though stated by Auditors as having been present in
the Occasion in question should and upon the original examination
admitted his having been so, should on the recapitulatory
examination deny his having been so: in this
case it might be of use that Auditor should be forthcoming
for the purpose of being confronted with him, that so
by means with the help of the mutual interrogation the truth of the
matter might may be brought to light

Art. 23 On a day in which there is no recapitulatory
examination on the prospect, the Quasi-Jury will add itself to the
company of Spontaneous Visitors, as per Ch. XV: but will occupy
its appropriate seat.






Identifier: | JB/034/202/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-10-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

21-23

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code; procedure code

Folio number

202

Info in main headings field

or procedure enactive part

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10476

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in