JB/150/486/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/486/001: Difference between revisions

ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<note>4 Inseranda<lb/> Observations<lb/># Board<lb/>S.10<lb/>Power of <gap/></note>
<note>4 Inseranda<lb/> Observations<lb/># Board<lb/>§.10<lb/>Power of <gap/></note>
<p>subordinates, would not look well in an Act of<lb/>Parliament: it would carry the appearances of<lb/> a violation of legal preambles &#x2014; of an encroachment<lb/> upon the province of a Jury. Yet in an<lb/>indirect way under favour of the <hi rend="underline">direct</hi> <lb/>of <hi rend="underline">fining</hi>, the <hi rend="underline">actual</hi> power of <hi rend="underline">awarding damages</hi><lb/>in such a case might be exercised, <gap/> great<lb/> advantages of all parties &#x2014; (the public, the individual<lb/>injured, and the difficult official injurer) just<lb/>in the same way and after the same <gap/><lb/>as the same sort of power is exercised to so<lb/>much advantage by the Court of King's Bench<lb/>when it is remarked to <add><del>a</del></add> <del>the</del> delinquent to talk<lb/>with the prosecutor, and to go before the Master.</p>
 
<p>subordinates, would not look well in an Act of<lb/>Parliament: it would carry the appearances of<lb/> a violation of legal preambles &#x2014; of an encroachment<lb/> upon the province of a Jury. Yet in an<lb/>indirect way under favour of the <hi rend="underline">direct</hi> <lb/>of <hi rend="underline">fining</hi>, the <hi rend="underline">actual</hi> power of <hi rend="underline">awarding damages</hi><lb/>in such a case might be exercised, to the great<lb/> advantages of all parties &#x2014; (the public, the individual<lb/>injured, and the difficult official injurer) just<lb/>in the same way and after the same <gap/><lb/>as the same sort of power is exercised to so<lb/>much advantage by the Court of King's Bench<lb/>when it is remarked to <add><del>a</del></add> <del>the</del> delinquent to talk<lb/>with the prosecutor, and to go before the Master.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:43, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

4 Inseranda
Observations
# Board
§.10
Power of

subordinates, would not look well in an Act of
Parliament: it would carry the appearances of
a violation of legal preambles — of an encroachment
upon the province of a Jury. Yet in an
indirect way under favour of the direct
of fining, the actual power of awarding damages
in such a case might be exercised, to the great
advantages of all parties — (the public, the individual
injured, and the difficult official injurer) just
in the same way and after the same
as the same sort of power is exercised to so
much advantage by the Court of King's Bench
when it is remarked to a the delinquent to talk
with the prosecutor, and to go before the Master.



Identifier: | JB/150/486/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

486

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / f62

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50707

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in