JB/141/137/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/137/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Punishment <foreign>in alienam personam</foreign></head>


<p><note><add>Ins:<hi rend="superscript">n</hi></add> Collective Punish<hi rend="superscript">ts</hi></note> men for the misbehaviour of a part of it. I will<lb/>
mention <add><del>take notice</del></add> them in their order.</p>
<p>The first I shall mention is the case of the city<lb/>
<note><del><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> 7<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Sept.<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></del></note> of Edin<del>g</del>burgh which happen'd in  <del>1737</del>.1736.<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> A<lb/>
very numerous mob rose up in arms, seized the<lb/>
City Guard, possessed themselves of the City Gates,<lb/>
and in defiance of the<add><del>committed an inorder</del></add>
<del>Incens</del><add>public <del>Regents</del>)</add> authorities, put to<lb/>
death a Captain <hi rend="underline">Porteous</hi> who <del>had been</del><add><del><gap/></del></add> <add>lay</add> under<lb/>
sentence of death but had been reprieved. This outrage<lb/>
occasioned an Act of Parliament to be<lb/>
<note>*10 G.2.c.34</note> made* <del>by which the <gap/></del><add><del>10 G. 2. <gap/> c. 34</del></add> By this Act a particular<lb/>
punishment is inflicted upon the <add>Lord</add> Provost<lb/>
of the Town for the particular neglect <del>that is there</del><add>he is there</add><lb/>
<note><del>in not taking any<lb/> measures to prevent the<lb/> riot, though he knew<lb/> of <sic>it's</sic> being intended.</del></note> charged with: but besides this, a fine is laid on<lb/>
the Corporation.</p>


<p>Of these punishments that on the
<add><del>The <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> of <gap/> the <gap/> for supplying</del></add> Provost, we may<lb/>
observe was <del>punishment</del> <hi rend="underline"><foreign>in propriam personam</foreign></hi>.<lb/>
The fine on the corporation was a collective punishment,<lb/>
falling on as many persons <del>who</del><add>as</add> might<lb/>
find themselves in any shape prejudiced by such<lb/>
fine. How the ground<add><del>reason for motive</del></add> of applying this latter punishment<lb/>
was not the <del>inabsolute</del> absolute<add><del><gap/></del></add> impracticability<lb/>
of applying any <del>proper</del> punishment of<lb/>
the proper kind at all. The Provost <del>as</del> we see<lb/>
was punished for the negative offence of <del><gap/></del><add>his</add> neglect.<lb/>
<del>glect</del> And it appears <add><del>is <gap/> in</del></add> from another Act which<lb/>
immediately follows that in question that a number<lb/>
of persons were actually <del>fugittives
</del><add>fugitives</add> for the <add>principal</add></p><pb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:39, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Punishment in alienam personam

Ins:n Collective Punishts men for the misbehaviour of a part of it. I will
mention take notice them in their order.

The first I shall mention is the case of the city
+ 7th Sept.r of Edingburgh which happen'd in 1737.1736.+ A
very numerous mob rose up in arms, seized the
City Guard, possessed themselves of the City Gates,
and in defiance of thecommitted an inorder Incenspublic Regents) authorities, put to
death a Captain Porteous who had been lay under
sentence of death but had been reprieved. This outrage
occasioned an Act of Parliament to be
*10 G.2.c.34 made* by which the 10 G. 2. c. 34 By this Act a particular
punishment is inflicted upon the Lord Provost
of the Town for the particular neglect that is therehe is there
in not taking any
measures to prevent the
riot, though he knew
of it's being intended.
charged with: but besides this, a fine is laid on
the Corporation.

Of these punishments that on the The of the for supplying Provost, we may
observe was punishment in propriam personam.
The fine on the corporation was a collective punishment,
falling on as many persons whoas might
find themselves in any shape prejudiced by such
fine. How the groundreason for motive of applying this latter punishment
was not the inabsolute absolute impracticability
of applying any proper punishment of
the proper kind at all. The Provost as we see
was punished for the negative offence of his neglect.
glect And it appears is in from another Act which
immediately follows that in question that a number
of persons were actually fugittives fugitives for the principal


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/141/137/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

137

Info in main headings field

punishment in alienam personam

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f34 / f35

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48354

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in