JB/008/136/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/008/136/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/008/136/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/008/136/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>(4.)</p>
<p>If, to any person, the truth of the here averred<lb/>
encrease, of the ratio of loss to profit, on each instance<lb/>
of past separation, presents itself as<lb/>
<add>exposed</add></p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Note (a) contin.<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/>
<p>6. Annual aggregate of such particular Expenditure<lb/>
for the 20 provinces will thus be R.V. 200,000,000.<lb/>
</p>


<p>7. Antecedently to any separation, total<lb/>
annual amount of universally-applying<lb/>
and particularly-applying expenditure<lb/>
together will thus be &#x2014;&#x2014; 400,000,000.<lb/>
Thus as to <hi rend="underline">expenditure</hi>: in the language of Book-keeping,<lb/> loss.</p>


<p>Now as to <hi rend="underline">profit</hi>: since for the purpose of the argument<lb/>
in despite of probability, existence of a profit<lb/>
must be supposed. Antecedently to the first separation, <lb/>
profit (say) <hi rend="underline">exactly equal</hi> to loss: say then R.V <lb/>400,000,000.</p>


<p>1. State of the account at the end of the first year, after<lb/>
separation of the province first separated.<lb/>
Total Expenditure &#x2014;&#x2014; 390,000,000<lb/>
Total Receipt &#x2014;&#x2014; 380,000,000.<lb/>
Ratio of loss to profit as 39. to 38.</p>
<p>2. On the second separation, it will be as 38 to 36: that is, as<lb/>
19. to 18.</p>
<p>3. On the third separation, as 37. to 34.</p>
<p>4. On the fourth as 36. to 32: that is as 18. to 16; or 9. to 8.<lb/>
To continue the series any further would be needless.<lb/>
From what has been seen, it will be sufficiently<lb/>
evident that, at the point of time immediately preceding<lb/>
the last separation of the <hi rend="underline">twenty</hi>, the ratio of loss<lb/>
to profit will have been as 20. to 1.</p>
<p>End of the note.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:22, 21 July 2021

Click Here To Edit

(4.)

If, to any person, the truth of the here averred
encrease, of the ratio of loss to profit, on each instance
of past separation, presents itself as
exposed

Note (a) contin.d

6. Annual aggregate of such particular Expenditure
for the 20 provinces will thus be R.V. 200,000,000.

7. Antecedently to any separation, total
annual amount of universally-applying
and particularly-applying expenditure
together will thus be —— 400,000,000.
Thus as to expenditure: in the language of Book-keeping,
loss.

Now as to profit: since for the purpose of the argument
in despite of probability, existence of a profit
must be supposed. Antecedently to the first separation,
profit (say) exactly equal to loss: say then R.V
400,000,000.

1. State of the account at the end of the first year, after
separation of the province first separated.
Total Expenditure —— 390,000,000
Total Receipt —— 380,000,000.
Ratio of loss to profit as 39. to 38.

2. On the second separation, it will be as 38 to 36: that is, as
19. to 18.

3. On the third separation, as 37. to 34.

4. On the fourth as 36. to 32: that is as 18. to 16; or 9. to 8.
To continue the series any further would be needless.
From what has been seen, it will be sufficiently
evident that, at the point of time immediately preceding
the last separation of the twenty, the ratio of loss
to profit will have been as 20. to 1.

End of the note.


Identifier: | JB/008/136/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 8.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

008

Main Headings

rid yourselves of ultramaria

Folio number

136

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

12

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

(c1 - c12)

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman 1820

Marginals

Paper Producer

john flowerdew colls

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1820

Notes public

ID Number

3240

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in