★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/163/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/149/163/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><del>person</del> witness that he can be <add>either</add> convicted <del>or so much<lb/> | |||
' | as</del> put upon his trial <del>or</del> arrested or called to<lb/> | ||
<del><gap/></del> <add>account</add> in any shape: – if he is guilty, it is<lb/> | |||
much more favourable to him than it would be<lb/> | |||
if the informant declared himself, because in<lb/> | |||
that case conviction, as above mentioned might<lb/> | |||
take place at once, without <add>either</add> the trouble of looking<lb/> | |||
out for <del>the</del> further <del>sufficient</del> evidence, or the danger<lb/> | |||
of not getting it. In what way could anonymous<lb/> | |||
information be more prejudicial to him than<lb/> | |||
information from a person known, or <del>any thing near</del> <add>so much as</add><lb/> | |||
equally prejudicial? No <del>Board</del> Magistrate, no<lb/> | |||
Board, no Jury ever yet convicted upon such<lb/> | |||
evidence on the bare allegation of an unknown<lb/> | |||
information, or of any number of unknown informants: – to ground a conviction, there must<lb/> | |||
be evidence given by an individual known,<lb/> | |||
examined in person, <del><add><gap/></add> and examined</del> upon oath<lb/> | |||
and in presence of the party charged. So sure as<lb/> | |||
a Magistrate presumed to convict without the concurrence<lb/> | |||
of any of those requisites (<hi rend="underline">confession</hi><lb/> | |||
which supersedes them all being here out of the<lb/> | |||
question) so surely would he himself be convicted<lb/> | |||
and punished on application to the Court of King's<lb/> | |||
Bench. <del>The difference</del> In every point of view<lb/> | |||
it is so much the better for the party <del>of</del> whose<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> <add>supposed</add> practices or designs form the subject matter of<lb/> | |||
the information, that the informant should be<lb/> | |||
unknown. If the informant were known, conviction<lb/> | |||
and punishment <del>of the party <unclear>referenced</unclear> against</del> would be<lb/> | |||
the probable consequence. But so long as the informant<lb/> | |||
is unknown, conviction without some other evidence is impossible,<lb/> | |||
and the worst that can happen to <del>the</del> a plotter is<lb/> | |||
the frustration of the plot.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
person witness that he can be either convicted or so much
as put upon his trial or arrested or called to
account in any shape: – if he is guilty, it is
much more favourable to him than it would be
if the informant declared himself, because in
that case conviction, as above mentioned might
take place at once, without either the trouble of looking
out for the further sufficient evidence, or the danger
of not getting it. In what way could anonymous
information be more prejudicial to him than
information from a person known, or any thing near so much as
equally prejudicial? No Board Magistrate, no
Board, no Jury ever yet convicted upon such
evidence on the bare allegation of an unknown
information, or of any number of unknown informants: – to ground a conviction, there must
be evidence given by an individual known,
examined in person, and examined upon oath
and in presence of the party charged. So sure as
a Magistrate presumed to convict without the concurrence
of any of those requisites (confession
which supersedes them all being here out of the
question) so surely would he himself be convicted
and punished on application to the Court of King's
Bench. The difference In every point of view
it is so much the better for the party of whose
supposed practices or designs form the subject matter of
the information, that the informant should be
unknown. If the informant were known, conviction
and punishment of the party referenced against would be
the probable consequence. But so long as the informant
is unknown, conviction without some other evidence is impossible,
and the worst that can happen to the a plotter is
the frustration of the plot.
Identifier: | JB/149/163/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
149 |
police bill |
||
163 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d7 |
||
jeremy bentham |
g&ep 1794 |
||
fr3 |
|||
1794 |
|||
50017 |
|||