JB/149/350/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/149/350/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>A To place prominently forward the connection between<lb/>
interest and duty in all the concerns of private life is the object<lb/>
now proposed. The more closely the subject is examined the more<lb/>
obvious will the <del>argument</del> <add>agreement</add> between interest and duty appear.<lb/>
All laws which have for their end the happiness of those concerned<lb/>
endeavour to make that for a man's interest which they proclaim<lb/>
to be his duty. And in the <!-- ink blots on page -->moral field it cannot be<lb/>
a man's duty to do that which it is not his interest to do.<lb/>
Morality will teach him rightly to estimate his interest and<lb/>
his duties, and examination will show their coincidence.<lb/>
[That a man ought to sacrifice his <del>interest</del> <add>happiness</add> to his duty is a<lb/>
<del>very</del> common position, &#x2014; that such or such a man has<lb/>
sacrificed his <del>interest</del> <add>happiness</add> to his duty is a common assertion, &#x2014;<lb/>
and made the groundwork of admiration. But when <del>interest</del> <add>happiness</add><lb/>
and duty are considered in their broadest sense it will be<lb/>
seen that in the general tenor of life the sacrifice of <del>a</del><lb/>
<del>interest</del> <add>happiness</add> to duty is neither possible nor <del>so much as</del> desirable &#x2014;<lb/>
that it cannot <del>in fact</del> have place &#x2014; and that if<lb/>
it could tho <del>happiness</del> <add>interests</add> of mankind would not be promoted<lb/>
by it.]</p>


<note>Sacrifice</note>


<p>It has been almost invariably the practice in treating<lb/>
of morals to speak of a man's <hi rend="underline">duty</hi> and nothing more &#x2014;<lb/>
now though it can scarcely be said with <del><gap/></del> truth<lb/>
that what is not a man's interest is not his duty, it<lb/>
may be safely pronounced that unless it can be shown<lb/>
that a particular action or course of conduct is for a<lb/>
man's interest, the attempt to prove to him that it is his<lb/>
duty will be but a waste of words. Yet with such <add>waste</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:42, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

A To place prominently forward the connection between
interest and duty in all the concerns of private life is the object
now proposed. The more closely the subject is examined the more
obvious will the argument agreement between interest and duty appear.
All laws which have for their end the happiness of those concerned
endeavour to make that for a man's interest which they proclaim
to be his duty. And in the moral field it cannot be
a man's duty to do that which it is not his interest to do.
Morality will teach him rightly to estimate his interest and
his duties, and examination will show their coincidence.
[That a man ought to sacrifice his interest happiness to his duty is a
very common position, — that such or such a man has
sacrificed his interest happiness to his duty is a common assertion, —
and made the groundwork of admiration. But when interest happiness
and duty are considered in their broadest sense it will be
seen that in the general tenor of life the sacrifice of a
interest happiness to duty is neither possible nor so much as desirable —
that it cannot in fact have place — and that if
it could tho happiness interests of mankind would not be promoted
by it.]

Sacrifice

It has been almost invariably the practice in treating
of morals to speak of a man's duty and nothing more —
now though it can scarcely be said with truth
that what is not a man's interest is not his duty, it
may be safely pronounced that unless it can be shown
that a particular action or course of conduct is for a
man's interest, the attempt to prove to him that it is his
duty will be but a waste of words. Yet with such waste



Identifier: | JB/149/350/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

149

Main Headings

Folio number

350

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

a

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

i m & co 1831

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1831

Notes public

ID Number

50204

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in