JB/036/031/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/036/031/001: Difference between revisions

Lauraterry (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


<head>1821. April 24.</head><lb/><lb/>
<head>1821. April 24.</head><lb/><lb/>
III. Delusion. It remains to be shown how it is that, byone<lb/>
<p>III. Delusion. It remains to be shown how it is that, byone<lb/>
and the same quantity of the matter of wealth consumed in waste -<lb/>
and the same quantity of the matter of wealth consumed in waste -<lb/>
wasted in the main endeavour to inject an additional quantity of<lb/>
wasted in the main endeavour to inject an additional quantity of<lb/>
Line 10: Line 10:
of receiving any more - how, by this same quantity of wealth,<lb/>
of receiving any more - how, by this same quantity of wealth,<lb/>
in addition to the purpose of producing corrupt obsequiousness, the purpose<lb/>
in addition to the purpose of producing corrupt obsequiousness, the purpose<lb/>
of producing delusions is but <gap/> effectually and extensively accomplished.<lb/><lb/>
of producing delusions is but <gap/> effectually and extensively accomplished.</p>
In the case where production of corrupt obsequiousness was<lb/>
 
the object, the persons on<unclear><add><del>to over</del></add></unclear> whom the operation was performed were the<lb/>
<p>In the case where production of corrupt obsequiousness was<lb/>
<unclear>subruling</unclear> influential and opulent few, with no other addition than<lb/>
the object, the persons on <unclear><add><del>to over</del></add></unclear> whom the operation was performed were the<lb/>
that of that comparatively small portion of the subject many, to <del>the<lb/> <note>whom the corruptive influence<lb/>
sub-ruling influential and opulent few, with no other addition than<lb/>
that of that comparatively small portion of the subject many, to <del>the</del><lb/> <note>whom the corruptive influence<lb/>
of those their superiors could be applied<lb/>
of those their superiors could be applied<lb/>
for the purpose of<lb/></note>
for the purpose of<lb/></note>
effect</del> of producing correspondent corrupt obsequiousness. <del>the <add>corruptive</add> influence</del><lb/>
<del>effect</del> of producing correspondent corrupt obsequiousness. <del>the <add>corruptive</add> influence</del><lb/>
<del>of those their superiors could be extended. <add>applied</add></del> In the ease of delusion, the<lb/>
<del>of those their superiors could be extended. <add>applied</add></del> In the ease of delusion, the<lb/>
person, <del><add>in whose instance</add></del> <add>on whom</add><del>on whom the operation is performed</del> the effect is endeavoured<lb/>
person, <del><add>in whose instance</add></del> <add>on whom</add><del>on whom the operation is performed</del> the effect is endeavoured<lb/>
Line 25: Line 26:
word, the whole of the community without exception - the Royal <del><add>Lead</add></del> Chief<lb/>
word, the whole of the community without exception - the Royal <del><add>Lead</add></del> Chief<lb/>
himself, by whom the <del>benefit</del> <add>profit</add> of the delusion was reaped in the greatest<lb/>
himself, by whom the <del>benefit</del> <add>profit</add> of the delusion was reaped in the greatest<lb/>
abundance, not excepted.<lb/>
abundance, not excepted.</p>
<del>By delusion, on this occasion as on others, understand</del><lb/>
 
<p><del>By delusion, on this occasion as on others, understand</del><lb/>
On this as on other occasions, such is the ambiguity and imperfection<lb/>
On this as on other occasions, such is the ambiguity and imperfection<lb/>
of language, to the word delusions as to so many others<lb/>
of language, to the word delusions as to so many others<lb/>
Line 35: Line 37:
it is employed to designate the act whereby an erroneous opinion<lb/>
it is employed to designate the act whereby an erroneous opinion<lb/>
is produced, sometimes the erroneous opinion so produced<lb/>
is produced, sometimes the erroneous opinion so produced<lb/>
 
</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1821. April 24.

III. Delusion. It remains to be shown how it is that, byone
and the same quantity of the matter of wealth consumed in waste -
wasted in the main endeavour to inject an additional quantity of
happiness into a receptacle over and over again disabled from the capacity
of receiving any more - how, by this same quantity of wealth,
in addition to the purpose of producing corrupt obsequiousness, the purpose
of producing delusions is but effectually and extensively accomplished.

In the case where production of corrupt obsequiousness was
the object, the persons on to over whom the operation was performed were the
sub-ruling influential and opulent few, with no other addition than
that of that comparatively small portion of the subject many, to the
whom the corruptive influence
of those their superiors could be applied
for the purpose of
effect of producing correspondent corrupt obsequiousness. the corruptive influence
of those their superiors could be extended. applied In the ease of delusion, the
person, in whose instance on whomon whom the operation is performed the effect is endeavoured
to be produced, are, in addition to the subruling, the influential and
the opulent few - (for these are not less exposed to, nor less susceptible
of, the delusion than the many)- the subject many likewise: in a
word, the whole of the community without exception - the Royal Lead Chief
himself, by whom the benefit profit of the delusion was reaped in the greatest
abundance, not excepted.

By delusion, on this occasion as on others, understand
On this as on other occasions, such is the ambiguity and imperfection
of language, to the word delusions as to so many others
that exhibit the same grammatical form, sometimes the an active
sense, sometimes a passive sense is attributive of this as of so
many other words wearing the same grammatical form, use is
made sometimes in an active, sometimes in a passive sense: sometimes
it is employed to designate the act whereby an erroneous opinion
is produced, sometimes the erroneous opinion so produced



Identifier: | JB/036/031/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 36.

Date_1

1821-04-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

036

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

031

Info in main headings field

first lines

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c9

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

c wilmott 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

andreas louriottis

Corrections

richard doane

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

10955

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in