JB/123/234/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/123/234/002: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


14<lb/><hi rend="underline"><head>Case relative to the Tothill Fields Bill.</head></hi><p>the whole value of the subject to be divided<hi rend="superscript">(f)</hi>. But, upon a plan<lb/>of Division such as that, the particular accidental interests just<lb/>spoken of, would be more <sic>compleatly</sic> and irremediably sacrificed,<lb/>than on the plan here proposed. Those to whom it is now of<lb/>the most value would have no greater Share than any of the<lb/>thousands to whom, in it present state it is of no value at all. &#x2014;</p>
<p>14</p>
<p>Another Impediment which of itself might be sufficient<lb/>to prevent any future and different division or Improvement of the<lb/>Waste, is the uncertainty that prevails (as already stated) with regard<lb/>to the proportionable quantities of Interest, as between the Dean and<lb/>Chapter as <hi rend="underline">Lords</hi> on the one hand, and the Inhabitants aforesaid<lb/>as <hi rend="underline">Commoners</hi> on the other. This uncertainty will be continually<lb/>increasing, while by Encroachment, (a practice of which the<lb/>Spot in question affords not a few examples) the very subject<lb/>matter itself will be as continually crumbling away. The benefit<lb/>reaped by the Dean and Chapter being <hi rend="underline">nothing</hi>, and the benefit<lb/>to the Commoners being in the instance of a vast majority of<lb/>them <hi rend="underline">next to nothing</hi>, neither party has ever found any<lb/>adequate Inducement for engaging in that tedious and expensive<lb/>course of Litigation, without which, in the ordinary mode of<lb/>proceeding, the uncertainty could not be removed; particularly<lb/>the Dean and Chapter, a body composed of Individuals mostly<lb/>advanced in Life, and whose Interest in the Premises does<lb/>not survive to their natural representatives: and as the<lb/>subject matter of the Investigation grows less and less, so would<lb/>the Inducement to engage in it. The present Bill while for<lb/>the first time it gives a value to these Interests, provide a<lb/>summary</p>-----<p><hi rend="superscript">(f)</hi>Number of Acres remaining after allowance made for<lb/>Roads and an allotment of 10 or 11 Acres clear for the<lb/>Westminster Scholars say 40: Number of Inhabitants in S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Margarets<lb/>12,000 in S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Johns 8,000: (S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Johns appointing 20 out of the 50<lb/>joint Vestryment to 30 of S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Margarets) Total 20,000 &#x2014; divided by 5 to obtain the number of Householders, 4,000. &#x2014;</p>
<head><hi rend="underline">Case relative to the Tothill Fields Bill.</hi></head>
 
<p>the whole value of the subject to be divided<hi rend="superscript">(f)</hi>. But, upon a plan<lb/>of Division such as that, the particular accidental interests just<lb/>spoken of, would be more <sic>compleatly</sic> and irremediably sacrificed,<lb/>than upon the plan here proposed. Those to whom it is now of<lb/>the most value would have no greater Share than any of the<lb/>thousands to whom, in its present state it is of no value at all. &#x2014;</p>
 
<p>Another Impediment which of itself might be sufficient<lb/>to prevent any future and different division or Improvement of the<lb/>Waste, is the uncertainty that prevails (as already stated) with regard<lb/>to the proportionable quantities of Interest, as between the Dean and<lb/>Chapter as <hi rend="underline">Lords</hi> on the one hand, and the Inhabitants aforesaid<lb/>as <hi rend="underline">Commoners</hi> on the other. This uncertainty will be continually<lb/>increasing, while by Encroachment, (a practice of which the<lb/>Spot in question affords not a few examples) the very subject<lb/>matter itself will be as continually crumbling away. The benefit<lb/>reaped by the Dean and Chapter being <hi rend="underline">nothing</hi>, and the benefit<lb/>to the Commoners being in the instance of a vast majority of<lb/>them <hi rend="underline">next to nothing</hi>, neither party has ever found any<lb/>adequate Inducement for engaging in that tedious and expensive<lb/>course of Litigation, without which, in the ordinary mode of<lb/>proceeding, the uncertainty could not be removed; particularly<lb/>the Dean and Chapter, a body composed of Individuals mostly<lb/>advanced in Life, and whose Interest in the Premises does<lb/>not survive to their natural representatives: and as the<lb/>subject matter of the Investigation grows less and less, so would<lb/>the Inducement to engage in it. The present Bill while for<lb/>the first time it gives a value to these Interests, provide a<lb/>summary</p>
 
<p><hi rend="superscript">(f)</hi>Number of Acres remaining after allowance made for<lb/>Roads and an allotment of 10 or 11 Acres clear for the<lb/>Westminster Scholars say 40: Number of Inhabitants in S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Margarets<lb/>12,000 in S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Johns 8,000: (S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Johns appointing 20 out of the 50<lb/>joint Vestryment to 30 of S<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Margarets) Total 20,000 &#x2014; divided<lb/>by 5 to obtain the number of Householders, 4,000. &#x2014;</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:34, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

14

Case relative to the Tothill Fields Bill.

the whole value of the subject to be divided(f). But, upon a plan
of Division such as that, the particular accidental interests just
spoken of, would be more compleatly and irremediably sacrificed,
than upon the plan here proposed. Those to whom it is now of
the most value would have no greater Share than any of the
thousands to whom, in its present state it is of no value at all. —

Another Impediment which of itself might be sufficient
to prevent any future and different division or Improvement of the
Waste, is the uncertainty that prevails (as already stated) with regard
to the proportionable quantities of Interest, as between the Dean and
Chapter as Lords on the one hand, and the Inhabitants aforesaid
as Commoners on the other. This uncertainty will be continually
increasing, while by Encroachment, (a practice of which the
Spot in question affords not a few examples) the very subject
matter itself will be as continually crumbling away. The benefit
reaped by the Dean and Chapter being nothing, and the benefit
to the Commoners being in the instance of a vast majority of
them next to nothing, neither party has ever found any
adequate Inducement for engaging in that tedious and expensive
course of Litigation, without which, in the ordinary mode of
proceeding, the uncertainty could not be removed; particularly
the Dean and Chapter, a body composed of Individuals mostly
advanced in Life, and whose Interest in the Premises does
not survive to their natural representatives: and as the
subject matter of the Investigation grows less and less, so would
the Inducement to engage in it. The present Bill while for
the first time it gives a value to these Interests, provide a
summary

(f)Number of Acres remaining after allowance made for
Roads and an allotment of 10 or 11 Acres clear for the
Westminster Scholars say 40: Number of Inhabitants in St Margarets
12,000 in St Johns 8,000: (St Johns appointing 20 out of the 50
joint Vestryment to 30 of St Margarets) Total 20,000 — divided
by 5 to obtain the number of Householders, 4,000. —



Identifier: | JB/123/234/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 123.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

123

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

234

Info in main headings field

case relative to the tothill fields bill

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14

Penner

Watermarks

tw 1794

Marginals

Paper Producer

francis hall

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

see note 3 to letter 1392, vol. 6

ID Number

41660

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in