JB/035/003/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/003/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/003/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/003/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<!-- this double page folio is divided up into pencil/ink drawn columns (10 large columns across the two pages, with an 11th column of very small width).  There is a heading in each of the two pages' header positions, and writing within the second and third columns only. -->
<head>Jury Addenda</head><!-- written in pencil -->
<!-- horizontal line of header -->
<p><gap/> of
<lb/>
particular <gap/>
<lb/>
on this <unclear>kind</unclear>
<lb/>
with general popularity
<lb/></p>
<p>Recapitulations
<lb/>
parallel between
<lb/>
Juries and any
<lb/>
Judges.
<lb/></p>
<p>Particular unsuitableness
<lb/>
to France.
<lb/>
I. Ch. CII &amp; IV
<lb/></p>
<p>Superiority of my
<lb/>
plan to the Jury
<lb/>
Served by from analogy
<lb/>
by the unfitness
<lb/>
of the people
<lb/>
for legislation in
<lb/>
prison
<lb/></p>
<p>Popularity &#x2014; why
<lb/>
not have a sufficient
<lb/>
proof of real utility.
<lb/></p>
<p>It was never been
<lb/>
given to them but
<lb/>
in comparison with
<lb/>
Judges under a bad
<lb/>
dependence.
<lb/></p>
<p>Want of absolute
<lb/>
popularity : i:e:
<lb/>
of confidence in them
<lb/>
proved from the institution
<lb/>
of Special Juries.
<lb/></p>
<pb/><!-- the page break denotes the end of the current column (not the end of the page/quarter page) and moving to the next column at the top of the page -->
<!-- the horizontal line of the left page header,  which is effectively the top of the second column  -->
<p>Causes of the
<lb/>
popularity of
<lb/>
this tribunal
<lb/></p>
<pb/>
<head>Addenda Jury</head><!-- written in pencil in the header position on the right hand page of this two page folio.  The heading is positioned as right aligned. -->
<!-- horizontal line of header -->




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:45, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


Jury Addenda

of
particular
on this kind
with general popularity

Recapitulations
parallel between
Juries and any
Judges.

Particular unsuitableness
to France.
I. Ch. CII & IV

Superiority of my
plan to the Jury
Served by from analogy
by the unfitness
of the people
for legislation in
prison

Popularity — why
not have a sufficient
proof of real utility.

It was never been
given to them but
in comparison with
Judges under a bad
dependence.

Want of absolute
popularity : i:e:
of confidence in them
proved from the institution
of Special Juries.


---page break---


Causes of the
popularity of
this tribunal


---page break---

Addenda Jury



Identifier: | JB/035/003/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

003

Info in main headings field

jury addenda

Image

001

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10596

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in