JB/035/047/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/047/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/047/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/047/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>The unanimity, though perhaps an invariable<lb/> and certainly a very close <del>concomitant</del> <add>accompaniment</add> to the instruction<lb/><del>that</del> unanimity, <del><add>the instrument</add></del> <del>so much</del> <add>the feature so fondly</add> dwelt upon and<lb/><del>analyzed</del> idolized is happily not altogether an essential<lb/>one.  When I say <add>unanimity</add> the <add>unison of</add><lb/><add>minds</add>, it is in compliance with the impropriety<lb/>of language: <unclear><add>univocality</add></unclear>, <!-- ?neologism --> the union of views, if<lb/>there were such an expression, would be the proper <del><gap/></del></p>
 
<p><del>Now something may be said of the means by<lb/> which and by which only such<lb/>a sort of union could be insured.</del><lb/></p>
 
<p><gap/>. It is the sort of unanimity which tyrants<lb/> vouchsafe to be content with, and which none but<lb/>tyrants would they allow themselves to reflect,<lb/> would content themselves with: it is the unanimity<lb/> which in the Church is produced by forced creeds<lb/>and subscriptions, and tests and <del>penal laws</del>persecuting laws.</p>
 
<p>I speak here only of Juries for trial: as for sort<lb/>of Juries used for previous inquiry, under the name<lb/>of Grand-Juries, they will be considered separately.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:45, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

The unanimity, though perhaps an invariable
and certainly a very close concomitant accompaniment to the instruction
that unanimity, the instrument so much the feature so fondly dwelt upon and
analyzed idolized is happily not altogether an essential
one. When I say unanimity the unison of
minds, it is in compliance with the impropriety
of language: univocality, the union of views, if
there were such an expression, would be the proper

Now something may be said of the means by
which and by which only such
a sort of union could be insured.

. It is the sort of unanimity which tyrants
vouchsafe to be content with, and which none but
tyrants would they allow themselves to reflect,
would content themselves with: it is the unanimity
which in the Church is produced by forced creeds
and subscriptions, and tests and penal lawspersecuting laws.

I speak here only of Juries for trial: as for sort
of Juries used for previous inquiry, under the name
of Grand-Juries, they will be considered separately.




Identifier: | JB/035/047/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-7, 7a

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

047

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10640

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in