★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/074/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/035/074/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | |||
<head>1</head><lb/> | |||
<head>Juries</head><lb/> | |||
<head>Beaufory</head><lb/><!-- preceding in pencil --> | |||
<p>If any more <del>more</del> further argument can be wanting <lb/> in proof <add>can be</add> of the unfitness of this species of tribunal, <lb/> a more conclusive one can not be had <add>could not be wished for </add> than <lb/>what is afforded by the most professed and elaborate<lb/> argument I have been able to meet with <lb/>in favor of it.— A new branch is proposed <lb/>to be added to the Excise System: and <del>the</del> <add>one of the two</add> great <lb/>grievances in that system being the want of a <lb/>trial by Jury, great efforts are made by an <lb/>honourable gentleman, though on the ministerial <lb/>side to add in that instance an <hi rend='underline'>optional</hi><lb/> clause, giving the defendant in a prosecution <lb/>for smuggling the option of a trial in that mode.<lb/> </p> | |||
<p>Three objections are made to the summary mode <lb/>of procedure in use in cases of Excise: 1 the reward <lb/>given to the informer: 2. the insufficiency <add><sic>alledged</sic> shortness</add> of<lb/> the notice given <del>to</del> <add>to the Defendant</add> by the summons: and the <lb/>uncertainty whether <del>it</del> <add>in each case whether</add> in any given case it has<lb/> answered its end: <add>If </add>These three considerations <sic>is</sic><lb/> composed the ground and the sole ground <add>doubly</add> configured<lb/> for changing the trial before single <del>commonplace | |||
</del> Judges under<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1
Juries
Beaufory
If any more more further argument can be wanting
in proof can be of the unfitness of this species of tribunal,
a more conclusive one can not be had could not be wished for than
what is afforded by the most professed and elaborate
argument I have been able to meet with
in favor of it.— A new branch is proposed
to be added to the Excise System: and the one of the two great
grievances in that system being the want of a
trial by Jury, great efforts are made by an
honourable gentleman, though on the ministerial
side to add in that instance an optional
clause, giving the defendant in a prosecution
for smuggling the option of a trial in that mode.
Three objections are made to the summary mode
of procedure in use in cases of Excise: 1 the reward
given to the informer: 2. the insufficiency alledged shortness of
the notice given to to the Defendant by the summons: and the
uncertainty whether it in each case whether in any given case it has
answered its end: If These three considerations is
composed the ground and the sole ground doubly configured
for changing the trial before single commonplace
Judges under
|
Identifier: | JB/035/074/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
035 |
constitutional code; evidence; procedure code |
||
|
074 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / d2 / d3 / d4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
arthur young |
|||
|
10667 |
|||
