JB/037/132/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/037/132/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/037/132/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/037/132/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. May 3<lb/>
<head>1823. May 3</head> <note><gap/>marginal note text</note><lb/>
<!-- pencil --><head>Constitut. Code</head></p>
<head>Constitut.Code</head>
<p>This equality is the obvious and solely <add>only</add> obvious proportion<lb/>
<del>4</del> 3
as between share and share:  and if for <add>therefore</add> any other<lb/>
 
proportion <del>any nam</del> there be by that act <add>the adoption of</add> this part of<lb/>
 
each mans affairs be liberty to be conducted is a <unclear>maxim</unclear><lb/>
 
more conductive <add>contributory</add> to the happiness of all, it lies with him<lb/>
to point out such preferable proportion and to produce the<lb/>
reason why it is so.</p>
<p>Every man should have the appointment of his own<lb/>
Agent.  Every man should have the appointment of his own<lb/>
trustee – every man should have the appointment of his own<lb/>
Executor <add>testamentary</add>.  To these positions, every man, upon the very<lb/>
first mention of them, finds <add>feels</add> his consent given as a matter<lb/>
of course:  no man, let him consider the matter ever so closely<lb/>
or so frequently finds any reason for withdrawing it.</p>
<p>No man should have the appointment of any Agent<lb/>
of his.  No man should have the appointment of any Steward<lb/>
of his – no man should have the appointment of any Testamentary<lb/>
Executor of his.  To <add>From</add> these positions every man, upon<lb/>
the very first mention of them feels his consent withheld – as<lb/>
a matter of course:  no man, let him consider the matter <del>every</del><lb/>
ever so closely or so frequently finds any reason for bestowing<lb/>
it.  <add>Palpable</add> Absurdity is the quality which these several positions<lb/>
present to his view.</p>
<p>In the instance of each man on every occasion which<lb/>
there is for the appointment of an <del><gap/></del> Agent to act for him, the<lb/>
appointment should be not in him but in another man:  and<lb/>
so in the case of a Steward, so a Trustee, a Testamentary Executor.<lb/>
Here would be another <unclear>lesson</unclear> of readily acknowledged<lb/>
absurdities.  And by each such position would of course be<lb/>
suggested the question – and who is that other man <add>that other man who is he</add>?  and to<lb/>
this question no answer would ever be to be found by anybody.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:44, 10 July 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823. May 3
Constitut. Code

This equality is the obvious and solely only obvious proportion
as between share and share: and if for therefore any other
proportion any nam there be by that act the adoption of this part of
each mans affairs be liberty to be conducted is a maxim
more conductive contributory to the happiness of all, it lies with him
to point out such preferable proportion and to produce the
reason why it is so.

Every man should have the appointment of his own
Agent. Every man should have the appointment of his own
trustee – every man should have the appointment of his own
Executor testamentary. To these positions, every man, upon the very
first mention of them, finds feels his consent given as a matter
of course: no man, let him consider the matter ever so closely
or so frequently finds any reason for withdrawing it.

No man should have the appointment of any Agent
of his. No man should have the appointment of any Steward
of his – no man should have the appointment of any Testamentary
Executor of his. To From these positions every man, upon
the very first mention of them feels his consent withheld – as
a matter of course: no man, let him consider the matter every
ever so closely or so frequently finds any reason for bestowing
it. Palpable Absurdity is the quality which these several positions
present to his view.

In the instance of each man on every occasion which
there is for the appointment of an Agent to act for him, the
appointment should be not in him but in another man: and
so in the case of a Steward, so a Trustee, a Testamentary Executor.
Here would be another lesson of readily acknowledged
absurdities. And by each such position would of course be
suggested the question – and who is that other man that other man who is he? and to
this question no answer would ever be to be found by anybody.


Identifier: | JB/037/132/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 37.

Date_1

1823-05-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

8-11

Box

037

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

132

Info in main headings field

constitut. code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

11347

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in