JB/096/122/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/122/001: Difference between revisions

RexL (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>INTRODUCT. Ch. II [Of] Happiness. Notes. [1].</head>
<p><add>[a]</add> In all the Philosophical works of that admirable
<lb/>
Orator, <add>unless it be</add> <del>t</del>here and there <del><gap/></del> a passage<lb/>
in <del>the</del> <add>his</add> <hi rend='underline'>Offices</hi> <del>excepted</del>, there is scarce
<lb/>
a clear idea. They are accordingly much
<lb/>
made of at the Universities&#x2014;In Locke
<lb/>
there is scarce any thing but clear ideas.
<lb/>
<del>His name, a</del> <add>Accordingly</add> At Oxford, in spite of his Stature<lb/>
his name is kept as hush as possible.
<lb/>
His notions, if we may believe certain Tutors
<lb/>
lead to Atheism&#x2014;Certainly they lead to the
<lb/>
<del>freedom of thought</del> <add>exercise of reason</add>. Tis <del>for this reason</del> <add>on this account</add>
<lb/>
<note><sic>Tis</sic> by this principally that we may account <del>of</del> <add>for</add> the small matter more there is of that same freedom of &amp;c.</note> that <del>in spite of all obstacles</del> <add>notwithstanding all obstacles which are in common to both places</add> there is a<lb/>
little more of that <del>same</del> freedom at Cambridge,
<lb/>
where he is in honor, than at Oxford
<lb/>
where <add>even yet</add> he is <add>not yet <del>got</del> <add>risen out of</add> in disgrace.</p>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<p>We shall have little to say of pleasures. Legislators
<lb/>
<del>do not make pleasures</del> <add>deal <del>with</del> in them but little</add>. They take <add><del>They do not make pleasures:</del> If they make them at all</add>
<lb/>
them as they find them&#x2014;The internal
<lb/>
instruments of pleasure <add>any more than of pain</add> they cannot make:
<del><note>As to pleasures, <unclear>we</unclear> take them as we find them.</note>
</del></p>
<p>
<p>
In all the Philosophical works of that admirable<lb/>
God has made them what they are to be.
Orator, <add>unless it be</add><del>t</del>here  and there  a passage<lb/>
<lb/>
in <del>the</del> <add>his</add> <hi rend='underline'>Offices</hi> <del>excepted</del>, there is scarce<lb/>
The number &amp; now then the species of ....
a clear idea . They are accordingly much<lb/>
<lb/>
made of at the Universities - In Locke<lb/>
<del><note><add>T</add>it is in their power to make <gap/> in an indirect &amp; distant manner</note></del> The external instruments they have in modern <lb/>
there is scarce any thing but clear ideas-<lb/>
times applied themselves to make, and with <gap/>.</p>
<del>His name, <add>Accordingly</add> </del> <del>a</del>At Oxford, in spite of his Stature<lb/>
<p>The most crack-brained word-catchers never thought
his name is kept as <unclear>back</unclear> as possible.<lb/>
<lb/>
His notions, if we may believe certain x<lb/>
of saying that eating (to speak strictly I should
lead to Atheism &#x2014; Certainly they lead to the<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>freedom of thought</del>. <add>exercise of reason</add> This <del>for this reason</del> <add>on this account</add><lb/>
say the <hi rend='underline'>sensation</hi> perceived by a <add>hungry</add> man <del>who is</del>
that<del> x of all Articles</del> <add>notwithstanding all obstacles which are in common to both places</add> there is a<lb/>
<lb/>
little more of that <del>same</del> freedom at Cambridge,<lb/>
<del>hungry</del> while he he is eating) <del>and</del><add> or any of</add> these others which
where he is in honor, then at Oxford<lb/>
<lb/>
where <add>even yet</add> he is in disgrace  <add>not yet <del>got</del> <add>risen</add> out of</add><lb/></p>
we call <hi rend='underline'>pleasures</hi> was not a <hi rend='underline'>pleasure</hi>. &#x2014;
 
<lb/>
 
But such <hi rend='underline'>pleasures</hi> were not <hi rend='underline'>good</hi>&#x2014;<hi rend='underline'>Happiness</hi>
<lb/>
was not to be made up out of them&#x2014;<lb/>
they were not to enter into the composition
<lb/>
of <hi rend='underline'>Happiness</hi>&#x2014;Even that moment, the
<lb/>
words '<hi rend='underline'>good</hi>' and '<hi rend='underline'>happiness</hi>' ceased to
<lb/>
have a meaning.</p>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<p><del>able success. I am</del> <del>alluding to the</del> <del>premiums</del> <del><add>speaking of the bounties &amp;</add></del>
<lb/>
<del>given for the production of the <gap/> <gap/> the</del> <del><add><unclear>articles</unclear></add></del>
<lb/>
of wealth.</p><pb/>
<p><add>[b]</add> Noah invented a <add>[one]</add> new pleasure&#x2014;it was the
<lb/>
pleasure of inebriation&#x2014;Those who have imitated
<lb/>
him in it have in many civilized
<lb/>
Societies tho' lightly, been punished for it&#x2014;
<lb/>
One sees plainly enough the reason&#x2014;<del>It seems</del>
<lb/>
<del>plain enough that the</del> <note>the pleasures of it are obvious&#x2014;the pains also are obvious.</note> The <del>pain</del> pleasure it produces
<lb/>
in general is not equal to the pain.</p>
<p>Orpheus invented another pleasure&#x2014;It should</p>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<p>A certain Jew whose name <del>it were <gap/></del> <add>one need not mention</add>
<lb/>
<del>even to mention</del> passes <add>though the story does not warrant it</add> for the inventor<lb/>
of another pleasure&#x2014;It is a sad one; since<lb/>
it is bought <del>with</del> at the <sic>expence</sic> either of <del>health</del>
<lb/>
much greater pleasure; or of health, the basis
<lb/>
of all pleasures. Human Legislators have not proscribed
<lb/>
it: one sees very well the reason.
<lb/>
<del>A vice</del> <add>An act</add> without witness can not be proscribed to
<lb/>
any purpose&#x2014;Who would have thought
<lb/>
it? Divine Legislation <add>which alone could do it to any purpose</add> has proscribed it
<lb/>
but obscurely&#x2014;There is however much to be
<lb/>
said for this&#x2014;To a certain age <del>it is</del> <add><del><gap/></del>  the prohibition were</add> scarce
<lb/>
necessary. <add>With respect</add> to an age short of that it remains
<lb/>
always problematical, whether more would be deterred<lb/>
by the Sanction, than invited by the explanation<lb/>
of the offence.</p>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<p>seem a great one, to judge of it from what
<lb/>
<add>formerly especially, one</add> has been done for the sake of it&#x2014;The pains<del><add><unclear>especially</unclear></add></del>
<lb/>
belonging to it, however real, are not so obvious.
<lb/>
The most stupid of Legislators have
<lb/>
been among those who have proscribed it,
<lb/>
and with the greatest severity&#x2014;One may conclude
<lb/>
therefore that it was not from any view of
<lb/>
the pains belonging to it, that they proscribed
<lb/>
it.</p>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<note>Pains they create Pleasures they do but transfer.</note>
<p>We shall have little to say of pleasures: Legislators
<lb/>
deal in them but little&#x2014;If they
<lb/>
make them at all, it is by an oblique and
<lb/>
distant operation&#x2014;<add>In general</add> they take them as they
<lb/>
find them&#x2014;There are 3 ways in which
<lb/>
pleasures may be <del>said</del> <add>conceived</add> to be made, or in
<lb/>
other words, to be invented&#x2014;By <del>giving a new</del> <add>making the</add>
<lb/>
<del>form to the</del> <add>internal <del><unclear>again</unclear></del></add> instrument, by making (i. e. giving
<lb/>
a new form to a portion of another so as that it
<lb/>
may become an <note>to fit it for being an</note> external instrument; <del>&amp;</del><add> or</add> by
<lb/>
by pointing out a new mode of applying the one
<lb/>
of them to the other&#x2014;In either of these ways, sup</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

INTRODUCT. Ch. II [Of] Happiness. Notes. [1].

[a] In all the Philosophical works of that admirable
Orator, unless it be there and there a passage
in the his Offices excepted, there is scarce
a clear idea. They are accordingly much
made of at the Universities—In Locke
there is scarce any thing but clear ideas.
His name, a Accordingly At Oxford, in spite of his Stature
his name is kept as hush as possible.
His notions, if we may believe certain Tutors
lead to Atheism—Certainly they lead to the
freedom of thought exercise of reason. Tis for this reason on this account
Tis by this principally that we may account of for the small matter more there is of that same freedom of &c. that in spite of all obstacles notwithstanding all obstacles which are in common to both places there is a
little more of that same freedom at Cambridge,
where he is in honor, than at Oxford
where even yet he is not yet got <add>risen out of in disgrace.

We shall have little to say of pleasures. Legislators
do not make pleasures deal with in them but little. They take They do not make pleasures: If they make them at all
them as they find them—The internal
instruments of pleasure any more than of pain they cannot make: As to pleasures, we take them as we find them.

God has made them what they are to be.
The number & now then the species of ....
Tit is in their power to make in an indirect & distant manner The external instruments they have in modern
times applied themselves to make, and with .

The most crack-brained word-catchers never thought
of saying that eating (to speak strictly I should
say the sensation perceived by a hungry man who is
hungry while he he is eating) and or any of these others which
we call pleasures was not a pleasure. —
But such pleasures were not goodHappiness
was not to be made up out of them—
they were not to enter into the composition
of Happiness—Even that moment, the
words 'good' and 'happiness' ceased to
have a meaning.

able success. I am alluding to the premiums speaking of the bounties &
given for the production of the the articles
of wealth.


---page break---

[b] Noah invented a [one] new pleasure—it was the
pleasure of inebriation—Those who have imitated
him in it have in many civilized
Societies tho' lightly, been punished for it—
One sees plainly enough the reason—It seems
plain enough that the the pleasures of it are obvious—the pains also are obvious. The pain pleasure it produces
in general is not equal to the pain.

Orpheus invented another pleasure—It should

A certain Jew whose name it were one need not mention
even to mention passes though the story does not warrant it for the inventor
of another pleasure—It is a sad one; since
it is bought with at the expence either of health
much greater pleasure; or of health, the basis
of all pleasures. Human Legislators have not proscribed
it: one sees very well the reason.
A vice An act without witness can not be proscribed to
any purpose—Who would have thought
it? Divine Legislation which alone could do it to any purpose has proscribed it
but obscurely—There is however much to be
said for this—To a certain age it is the prohibition were scarce
necessary. With respect to an age short of that it remains
always problematical, whether more would be deterred
by the Sanction, than invited by the explanation
of the offence.

seem a great one, to judge of it from what
formerly especially, one has been done for the sake of it—The painsespecially
belonging to it, however real, are not so obvious.
The most stupid of Legislators have
been among those who have proscribed it,
and with the greatest severity—One may conclude
therefore that it was not from any view of
the pains belonging to it, that they proscribed
it.

Pains they create Pleasures they do but transfer.

We shall have little to say of pleasures: Legislators
deal in them but little—If they
make them at all, it is by an oblique and
distant operation—In general they take them as they
find them—There are 3 ways in which
pleasures may be said conceived to be made, or in
other words, to be invented—By giving a new making the
form to the internal again instrument, by making (i. e. giving
a new form to a portion of another so as that it
may become an to fit it for being an external instrument; & or by
by pointing out a new mode of applying the one
of them to the other—In either of these ways, sup



Identifier: | JB/096/122/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

122

Info in main headings field

introduct. ch. ii of happiness notes

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31126

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in