JB/549/075/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/549/075/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/075/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/075/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1828 July 25<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Nomography</head></p>
 
<p>Modes permanent narrowed or produce change of opinion:  either they produce false declaration of d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>.  Equity Examiners <hi rend="underline">impartiality</hi> – oath.<lb/>
 
Oath <hi rend="underline">promissory</hi> involves licence to committ all means of<lb/>
 
enormities where no oath is required.  Instance Judges Oaths</p>
<p><head>I.  Indirect Prohibitions – instances</head></p>
<p>1.  Appointing <add>for the wrong</add> a remedy, but rendering<lb/>
<add>expence of</add> the only mode of <add>making</add> application<lb/>
for it so expensive that the party<lb/>
wronged is thereby disabled from<lb/>
making the application requisite:<lb/>
viz. <add>for example</add> by taxes imposed on the<lb/>
use of the necessary <del>&amp;c</del> written<lb/>
instrument:  those taxes being imposed<lb/>
by and <del><gap/></del> the produce collected<lb/>
into the purse of government</p>
<p>2.  So by taxes imposed in the<lb/>
name of fees – <gap/> by judicial<lb/>
officers:  they being empowered to<lb/>
assess the tax, and put the produce<lb/>
into their own pockets.</p>
<p>3.  So by taxes which by the authority<lb/>
of judicial officers, the law<lb/>
assistants of parties are empowered to<lb/>
impose upon their respective clients<lb/>
or the antagonists of those same<lb/>
Clients.</p>
<p>4.  So by destroying the effect of<lb/>
the demand <del><gap/></del> on <del>pretence</del><lb/>
the ground of alledged inaptitude<lb/>
on the part of the instrument.<lb/>
&#9758; Nullity system the crime licensing<lb/>
Systems</p>
<p><head>II.  Indirect Licences – instances</head></p>
<p>1.  Prohibitions under a penalty:<lb/>
but, in <del>some</del> instances, to an extent<lb/>
more or less considerable, the penalty<lb/>
not heavy enough to outweigh<lb/>
the profit reaped by means<lb/>
of the offence:  the <add>gathering in the</add> net profit is<lb/>
thus the subject matter of a <add>the</add><lb/>
virtual licence:  the penalty <del>and</del><lb/>
with <del>the <gap/></del> whatsoever is <del>paid</del><lb/>
by the party so <unclear>harmed</unclear> paid<lb/>
under the name of costs is in<lb/>
this case the price paid for the<lb/>
licence.</p>
<p>2.  In the case of mendacity<lb/>
licence, requisite <add>made</add> of the security in<lb/>
some cases – <hi rend="underline">not</hi> made in any others.</p>
<p>So, in so far as the expence<lb/>
of suit for remedy for wrong is<lb/>
greater than the wrongee can support,<lb/>
the laws <del><gap/></del> Statute<lb/>
made and Judge made by<lb/>
which that expence is produced<lb/>
is a licence to committ wrongs<lb/>
of all sorts at the charge of <del>those</del><lb/>
all those who are so unable.</p>
<p><head>Instruments the Judge</head></p>
<p>4.  On the part of Landlords in<lb/>
the character of Magistrates, oppression<lb/>
for the purpose of depredation,<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> by <del><gap/></del> refusal of<lb/>
<add>Public House</add> licence, to other than their own<lb/>
Tenants, – licenced by King's Bench<lb/>
Judges by <del>refusal</del> stoppage of prosecution<lb/>
or pretence of non-probation<lb/>
of the corrupt motives</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 18 September 2024

Click Here To Edit

1828 July 25
Nomography

Modes permanent narrowed or produce change of opinion: either they produce false declaration of do. Equity Examiners impartiality – oath.
Oath promissory involves licence to committ all means of
enormities where no oath is required. Instance Judges Oaths

I. Indirect Prohibitions – instances

1. Appointing for the wrong a remedy, but rendering
expence of the only mode of making application
for it so expensive that the party
wronged is thereby disabled from
making the application requisite:
viz. for example by taxes imposed on the
use of the necessary &c written
instrument: those taxes being imposed
by and the produce collected
into the purse of government

2. So by taxes imposed in the
name of fees – by judicial
officers: they being empowered to
assess the tax, and put the produce
into their own pockets.

3. So by taxes which by the authority
of judicial officers, the law
assistants of parties are empowered to
impose upon their respective clients
or the antagonists of those same
Clients.

4. So by destroying the effect of
the demand on pretence
the ground of alledged inaptitude
on the part of the instrument.
☞ Nullity system the crime licensing
Systems

II. Indirect Licences – instances

1. Prohibitions under a penalty:
but, in some instances, to an extent
more or less considerable, the penalty
not heavy enough to outweigh
the profit reaped by means
of the offence: the gathering in the net profit is
thus the subject matter of a the
virtual licence: the penalty and
with the whatsoever is paid
by the party so harmed paid
under the name of costs is in
this case the price paid for the
licence.

2. In the case of mendacity
licence, requisite made of the security in
some cases – not made in any others.

So, in so far as the expence
of suit for remedy for wrong is
greater than the wrongee can support,
the laws Statute
made and Judge made by
which that expence is produced
is a licence to committ wrongs
of all sorts at the charge of those
all those who are so unable.

Instruments the Judge

4. On the part of Landlords in
the character of Magistrates, oppression
for the purpose of depredation,
by refusal of
Public House licence, to other than their own
Tenants, – licenced by King's Bench
Judges by refusal stoppage of prosecution
or pretence of non-probation
of the corrupt motives


Identifier: | JB/549/075/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549.

Date_1

1828-07-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

549

Main Headings

Folio number

075

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in