★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
Auto approved |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/161/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/549/161/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1829 June 27<lb/> | |||
' | <head>Nomography Collectanea. Inaptitude of the established.</head></p> | ||
<p>From the Spectator 27<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> June 1829 –</p> | |||
<p>Errors in Legislation. – A woman was on Saturday<lb/> | |||
brought before the Worship Street Magistrate, charged with<lb/> | |||
<gap/> her master's silk in the loom. She had been first taken<lb/> | |||
before a Magistrate in the City; But he found that the<lb/> | |||
crime had not been committed within his jurisdiction.<lb/> | |||
It was contended before M<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Broughton, as a County Magistrate,<lb/> | |||
that the accused and the accuser must be resident<lb/> | |||
in the same place before any Magistrate could <unclear>interfere</unclear>;<lb/> | |||
and as the complainer was resident in London, the<lb/> | |||
Magistrate had no jurisdiction. The Act of Parliament<lb/> | |||
was found to be so vaguely worded, that the Magistrate, as<lb/> | |||
the safest course, dismissed the case altogether. M<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Philliips<lb/> | |||
the barrister then remarked, that it would really be a<lb/> | |||
very desirable thing for the gentlemen of the House of<lb/> | |||
Commons to keep a schoolmaster to attend to the language<lb/> | |||
of their Acts, for scarcely one of them could be produced<lb/> | |||
whose meaning was to be understood from reading it. Mr<lb/> | |||
Broughton – "We can only take an Act of Parliament<lb/> | |||
as we find it, you know Mr. Phillips."</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1829 June 27
Nomography Collectanea. Inaptitude of the established.
From the Spectator 27th June 1829 –
Errors in Legislation. – A woman was on Saturday
brought before the Worship Street Magistrate, charged with
her master's silk in the loom. She had been first taken
before a Magistrate in the City; But he found that the
crime had not been committed within his jurisdiction.
It was contended before Mr. Broughton, as a County Magistrate,
that the accused and the accuser must be resident
in the same place before any Magistrate could interfere;
and as the complainer was resident in London, the
Magistrate had no jurisdiction. The Act of Parliament
was found to be so vaguely worded, that the Magistrate, as
the safest course, dismissed the case altogether. Mr. Philliips
the barrister then remarked, that it would really be a
very desirable thing for the gentlemen of the House of
Commons to keep a schoolmaster to attend to the language
of their Acts, for scarcely one of them could be produced
whose meaning was to be understood from reading it. Mr
Broughton – "We can only take an Act of Parliament
as we find it, you know Mr. Phillips."
Identifier: | JB/549/161/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1829-06-27 |
|||
549 |
|||
161 |
Nomography. Collectanea. Inaptitude of the Establishment |
||
001 |
|||
Collectanea |
|||
John Flowerdew Colls |
|||