JB/549/181/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/549/181/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/181/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/181/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. June 13<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Constitut. Code</head><note>&sect;. 2. Common Law</note></p>
 
<p>The compleat <gap/> of the <add>some</add> act its <gap/> usefulness –<lb/>
 
for purely useful in the <add>every</add> act by which pleasure is produced to<lb/>
 
one or more pain to none – the perfect purity of the act in every<lb/>
intelligible moral sense of the word purity will not in the<lb/>
situation of a <gap/> <unclear>Juryman</unclear> exempt the agent from receiving<lb/>
punishment at his hands will not suffice to exclude from<lb/>
the breast of a Grand Juryman the desire of seeing a man<lb/>
<del>punis</del> suffer punishment for it:  for to many a man of that<lb/>
class, pleasure in any shape enjoyed by a man of a <add>class</add> <gap/><lb/>
inferior to his <del><gap/></del> own is by means of the idea of it, a<lb/>
source of pain <add>suffering</add> in his breast.</p>
<p>Not that <del>by <gap/></del> in any case by the noxiousness<lb/>
ever so great would any justification be afforded for punishment<lb/>
awarded by such hands.  To the legislative authority and<lb/>
not to the judicial does it belong to <del>distrib</del> <add>take surveys of</add> look over the<lb/>
field of thought and <add>social</add> action to pick out sorts of acts, and<lb/>
by <unclear>inhibition</unclear> applied to them <unclear>is</unclear> punishment <unclear>appealed</unclear> to be attached<lb/>
to them, <unclear>convert</unclear> them into offences, <gap/> fallacy would<lb/>
it accordingly be where with those <gap/> words in his mouth<lb/>
a Judge is seen inflicting punishment or a man on account of<lb/>
his performance of a <unclear>sort</unclear> of act, <del>of</del> <add>to</add> which those generally<lb/>
unintelligible words have been applied by Judges or law-writers,<lb/>
to launch into invectives against the nature of the act, and<lb/>
supposing it <del>was a</del> in an so high a degree noxious speak<lb/>
of its noxiousness in a sufficient warrant <add>justification <unclear>excerpt</unclear></add> to a Judge in respect<lb/>
of his having visited with punishment a man by whom it has<lb/>
been proved to be done.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:46, 14 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1823. June 13
Constitut. Code§. 2. Common Law

The compleat of the some act its usefulness –
for purely useful in the every act by which pleasure is produced to
one or more pain to none – the perfect purity of the act in every
intelligible moral sense of the word purity will not in the
situation of a Juryman exempt the agent from receiving
punishment at his hands will not suffice to exclude from
the breast of a Grand Juryman the desire of seeing a man
punis suffer punishment for it: for to many a man of that
class, pleasure in any shape enjoyed by a man of a class
inferior to his own is by means of the idea of it, a
source of pain suffering in his breast.

Not that by in any case by the noxiousness
ever so great would any justification be afforded for punishment
awarded by such hands. To the legislative authority and
not to the judicial does it belong to distrib take surveys of look over the
field of thought and social action to pick out sorts of acts, and
by inhibition applied to them is punishment appealed to be attached
to them, convert them into offences, fallacy would
it accordingly be where with those words in his mouth
a Judge is seen inflicting punishment or a man on account of
his performance of a sort of act, of to which those generally
unintelligible words have been applied by Judges or law-writers,
to launch into invectives against the nature of the act, and
supposing it was a in an so high a degree noxious speak
of its noxiousness in a sufficient warrant justification excerpt to a Judge in respect
of his having visited with punishment a man by whom it has
been proved to be done.


Identifier: | JB/549/181/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549.

Date_1

1823-06-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

549

Main Headings

Folio number

181

Info in main headings field

Constitut. Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in