JB/547/008/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/547/008/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
<head>Ch. 1 § 2.</head>
<head>Ch. 1 § 2.</head>


<lb/><note>Ch. Beginning <lb/>§ Imperfection proofs <lb/>8<lb/>1<lb/>Mode of applying <lb/>to practice the rules<lb/>prohibitive of these<lb/>modes of imperfection<lb/>The conclusions are not <add>elegant and</add> categorical - only <add>indirect,</add> <lb/><add>disjunctive and</add> hypothetical: -<lb/>if <hi rend="underline">this</hi> be not insufficient, <lb/><hi rend="underline">that</hi> is superfluous<lb/></note><lb/>
<lb/><note>Ch. Beginning <lb/>§ Imperfection proofs <lb/>8<lb/>1<lb/>Mode of applying <lb/>to practice the rules<lb/>prohibitive of these<lb/>modes of imperfection<lb/>The conclusions are <lb/>not <add>direct and</add> categorical - only <add>indirect,</add> <lb/><add>disjunctive and</add> hypothetical: -<lb/>if <hi rend="underline">this</hi> be not insufficient, <lb/><hi rend="underline">that</hi> is superfluous<lb/></note><lb/>


<add>A sound <unclear>Copier</unclear> teaches more ideas than he himself knows</add><lb/>
<p><add>A sound <unclear>Copier</unclear> teaches more ideas than he himself knows</add><lb/>
§. Mode of applying to practice the rules prohibitive of<lb/>these modes of imperfection. <lb/>§.  Of what mode of proof the existence of these imperfections is susceptible<lb/><p>In regard to the rules correspondent to and prohibitive<lb/>of these several modes of imperfection whether they have<lb/>or have not been <gap/> in this or that instance a transgression<lb/>of them has or has not respectively <add>had</add> taken place <lb/>is a question which will very seldom be found<lb/>susceptible of any direct and categorical solution.<lb/>Indirect and hypothetical <add>and disjunctive</add> will be the only sort of<lb/>solution of which they will be found susceptible: of<lb/>two modes of remuneration <add>apportionment</add> if the first be not insufficient,<lb/>the second must be superfluous: if the second<lb/>be not superfluous, the first.<lb/></p><p>In looking over the state of existing practice, <del>it</del><lb/>instances <del>th</del> in which this sort of solution imperfect<lb/>as it is, <del>are found with</del> is afforded, will not be<lb/>wanting.<lb/></p>
<p>§. Mode of applying to practice the rules prohibitive of<lb/>these modes of imperfection. <lb/></p><p>§.  Of what mode of proof the existence of these imperfections is susceptible<lb/></p>


<note>2 <lb/>Examples <lb/>1. Species of service <lb/>the same,and restraining motions to be overcome the same <lb/>bearing whose <gap/> are to be engaged the same allowance greater to one ... than another</note> <lb/>demand <lb/>for service the same<lb/><p>To the same species of service the demand being<lb/>in both cases indistinguishably the same, <del>a greater</del> <add>the</add><lb/>allowance greater in one <add>of two</add> cases than in the other<lb/></p><note>3 <lb/>Other things the same as above, to persons bearing equal parts in the serive the allowance different: or allowance made to some person bearing no parat in it at all.</note> <lb/> <p>To the same individual service, the demand<lb/>being in both cases the same, the allowance <add>allotment</add> made to<lb/>one of two descriptions of persons concerned in it <add>bearing equal parts in the rendering of the service,</add> greater than<lb/>to the other: or what is still more simple and<lb/>conclusive, if two descriptions of persons <add>each <del>both</del> of</add> to whom<lb/>on the same occasion an allotment is made, the<lb/>one contributing more or less, the other nothing at all,<lb/>to the production of the effect.<lb/></p>
<p>In regard to the rules correspondent to and prohibitive<lb/>of these several modes of imperfection whether they have<lb/>or have not been <gap/> in this or that instance a transgression<lb/>of them has or has not respectively <add>had</add> taken place <lb/>is a question which will very seldom be found<lb/>susceptible of any direct and categorical solution.<lb/>Indirect and hypothetical <add>and disjunctive</add> will be the only sort of<lb/>solution of which they will be found susceptible: of<lb/>two modes of remuneration <add>apportionment</add> if the first be not insufficient,<lb/>the second must be superfluous: if the second<lb/>be not superfluous, the first.<lb/></p><p>In looking over the state of existing practice, <del>the</del><lb/>instances <del>th</del> in which this sort of solution imperfect<lb/>as it is, <del>are found with</del> is afforded, will not be<lb/>wanting.<lb/></p>
 
<note>2 <lb/>Examples <lb/>1. Species of service <lb/>the same, demand <lb/>for service the same<lb/>and restraining motions <lb/>to be overcome <lb/>the same <lb/><add>persons</add> having <lb/>whose services are to be <lb/>engaged the same, allowance <lb/>greater in one case<lb/>than another.</note> <lb/>
<p>To the same species of service the demand being<lb/>in both cases indistinguishably the same, <del>a greater</del> <add>the</add><lb/>allowance greater in one <add>of two</add> cases than in the other<lb/></p>
 
<note>3. <lb/>2. Other things the <lb/>same as above, to <lb/>persons bearing equal <lb/>parts in the service, <lb/>the allowance different: <lb/>or, allowance <lb/>made to some person <lb/>bearing no part <lb/>in it at all.</note> <lb/>  
<p>To the same individual service, the demand<lb/>being in both cases the same, the allowance <add>allotment</add> made to<lb/>one <add>of two</add> descriptions of persons concerned in it <add>bearing equal parts in the rendering of the service,</add> greater than<lb/>to the other: or, what is still more simple and<lb/>conclusive, if two descriptions of persons to <add>each <del>both</del> of</add> whom<lb/>on the same occasion an allotment is made, the<lb/>one contributing more or less, the other nothing at all,<lb/>to the production of the effect.<lb/></p><pb/>




Line 85: Line 91:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:56, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

27 Nov: 1810
Prizes

Ch. 1 § 2.


Ch. Beginning
§ Imperfection proofs
8
1
Mode of applying
to practice the rules
prohibitive of these
modes of imperfection
The conclusions are
not direct and categorical - only indirect,
disjunctive and hypothetical: -
if this be not insufficient,
that is superfluous

A sound Copier teaches more ideas than he himself knows

§. Mode of applying to practice the rules prohibitive of
these modes of imperfection.

§. Of what mode of proof the existence of these imperfections is susceptible

In regard to the rules correspondent to and prohibitive
of these several modes of imperfection whether they have
or have not been in this or that instance a transgression
of them has or has not respectively had taken place
is a question which will very seldom be found
susceptible of any direct and categorical solution.
Indirect and hypothetical and disjunctive will be the only sort of
solution of which they will be found susceptible: of
two modes of remuneration apportionment if the first be not insufficient,
the second must be superfluous: if the second
be not superfluous, the first.

In looking over the state of existing practice, the
instances th in which this sort of solution imperfect
as it is, are found with is afforded, will not be
wanting.

2
Examples
1. Species of service
the same, demand
for service the same
and restraining motions
to be overcome
the same
persons having
whose services are to be
engaged the same, allowance
greater in one case
than another.

To the same species of service the demand being
in both cases indistinguishably the same, a greater the
allowance greater in one of two cases than in the other

3.
2. Other things the
same as above, to
persons bearing equal
parts in the service,
the allowance different:
or, allowance
made to some person
bearing no part
in it at all.

To the same individual service, the demand
being in both cases the same, the allowance allotment made to
one of two descriptions of persons concerned in it bearing equal parts in the rendering of the service, greater than
to the other: or, what is still more simple and
conclusive, if two descriptions of persons to each both of whom
on the same occasion an allotment is made, the
one contributing more or less, the other nothing at all,
to the production of the effect.


---page break---






































Identifier: | JB/547/008/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547.

Date_1

1810-11-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

547

Main Headings

Folio number

008

Info in main headings field

Prizes

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in