JB/116/041/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/116/041/001: Difference between revisions

ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/041/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/041/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<note><!-- written in pencil -->9 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1802</note><lb/>
<p>9 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1802</p>
<note><!-- written in pencil -->Letter 3</note><lb/>
<head>Letter 3</head>
<note><!-- written in pencil -->Crown <gap/></note><lb/>
<note>Crown <gap/></note>
<note><!-- written in pencil -->A comment or two which drawn by the occasion from<lb/>the respectable pens to which we are indebted for the above<lb/>requested facts might be <add>themselves</add> trashed thus without comment.</note><lb/>
<p>A comment or two which drawn by the occasion from<lb/>the respectable pens to which we are indebted for the above<lb/>requested facts might be <add>themselves</add> trashed thus without comment.</p>
<note><!-- written in pencil -->Crown Ideology<lb/>Reformation<lb/><del>Conclusion</del></note><lb/>
<note>Crown Ideology<lb/>Reformation<lb/><del>Conclusion</del></note>
<p>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 6. Philadelphia; 1793: Bradford.</p>
<p>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 6. Philadelphia; 1793: Bradford.</p>


<p>In England says Judge Bradford (p.51) "a disposition to<lb/>"establish penitentiary houses has been discovered, and this<lb/>"rational expedient will probably be adopted when the Botany Bay<lb/>"scheme has been sufficiently tried."&#x2014;Alas! the eye of the<lb/>worthy magistrate could not pierce through the curtain here:<lb/>little could he imagine either the force or<lb/><del>see <gap/> neither the force nor</del> the grounds, of the attachment<lb/>to "improved" Colonies.</p>
<p>In England says Judge Bradford (p.51) "a disposition to<lb/>"establish penitentiary houses has been discovered, and this<lb/>"rational expedient will probably be adopted when the Botany Bay<lb/>"scheme has been sufficiently tried."&#x2014;Alas! the <del><gap/></del>eye of the<lb/>worthy magistrate could not pierce through the <del><gap/></del> curtain here:<lb/>little could he imagine either the force or<lb/><del>see <gap/> neither the force nor</del> the grounds, of the attachment<lb/>to "improved" Colonies.</p>
<note>Reformation<lb/> conclusion</note>
<note>Reformation<lb/> conclusion</note>
<p>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 7. Philadelphia; 1795: <unclear>Liancourt</unclear></p>
<p>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 7. Philadelphia; 1795: <unclear>Liancourt</unclear></p>
<p>Page 39. "Doctor Hunter of York, in England, a physician who<lb/>"has been remarkably successful in the care of insanity, places his<lb/>"principal dependence on removing from the enraged patients all<lb/>"appearance of constraint; and assists, by a mild and gentle treatment,<lb/>"their return to reason. Will this comparison of criminals with mad-men<lb/>"appear preposterous? Surely it ought not. Nothing more is<lb/>"wanting, than to find men who will devote themselves, without<lb/>"relaxation, to this important work. And doubtless such are to be<lb/>"found in England.*</p>
<p>Page 39. "Doctor Hunter of York, in England, a physician who<lb/>"has been remarkably successful in the care of insanity, places his<lb/>"principal dependence on removing from the enraged patients all<lb/>"appearance of constraint; and assists, by a mild and gentle treatment,<lb/>"their return to reason. Will this comparison of criminals with mad-men<lb/>"appear preposterous? Surely it ought not. Nothing more is<lb/>"wanting, than to find men who will devote themselves, without<lb/>"relaxation, to this important work. And doubtless such are to be<lb/>"found in England.*</p>
<p>* Yes: such are to <add>have to</add> be found in England: and what is the treatment<lb/>they receive? "Such <hi rend="underline">are</hi> to be found in England?&#x2014;Yes; and<lb/><hi rend="underline">have been</hi> found.&#x2014;And what is the treatment they have received?</p>
<p>* Yes: such are to <add>have to</add> be found <del><gap/></del>in England: and what is the treatment<lb/>they receive? "Such <hi rend="underline">are</hi> to be found in England?&#x2014;Yes; and<lb/><hi rend="underline">have been</hi> found.&#x2014;And what is the treatment they have received?</p>
<p>What says your Lordship to this? is your Lordship ready<lb/>to subscribe? is your Lordships hand ready to confirm it to<lb/> your <gap/>? Is this a treason? Is this sound doctrine<add>+</add><lb/>or <gap/> is its more proper place in the chapter of romance?<lb/>or is in the <gap/> only that it is to pass for law.<lb/> The possession is <gap/>. I at any rate can not <gap/> with<lb/> it: it was written neither by me nor for me nor with <gap/></p>
 
<p>+ or is it that the rules of<lb/>office were made only <gap/><lb/>only for playthings for given<lb/>gentlemen. Offices themselves <lb/>built only to rid the rogues<lb/>of their possessions?</p>
<note><!-- written in pencil -->What says your Lordship to this? is your Lordship ready<lb/>to subscribe? is your Lordships hand ready to confirm it to<lb/> your <gap/>? Is this a treason? Is this sound doctrine<add>+</add><lb/>or <gap/> is its more proper place in the chapter of romance?<lb/>or is in the <gap/> only that it is to pass for law.<lb/> The possession is <gap/>. I at any rate can not <gap/> with<lb/> it: it was written neither by me nor for me nor with <gap/></note>
<p>What says <add>by security</add> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/><gap/> who in<lb/>his letter to me of<lb/><gap/> |^^^| <gap/><lb/>of our Lordships<lb/>most noble predecessors.<lb/>What says him given<lb/>the D of Portland.<lb/>What says your<lb/>Lordships <gap/><lb/><gap/> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Addington<lb/>thought of me I<lb/>do bid <gap/> your<lb/>Lordship does who it is<lb/>that <gap/></p>
<note><!-- written in pencil -->[+] or is it that the rules of<lb/>office were made only <gap/><lb/>only for playthings for given<lb/>gentlemen. Offices themselves <lb/>built only to rid the rogues<lb/>of their possessions?</note>
<note><!-- written in pencil -->What says <add>by security</add> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/><gap/> who in<lb/>his letter to me of<lb/><gap/> |^^^| <gap/><lb/>of our Lordships<lb/>most noble predecessors.<lb/>What says him given<lb/>the D of Portland.<lb/>What says your<lb/>Lordships <gap/><lb/><gap/> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Addington<lb/>thought of me I<lb/>do bid <gap/> your<lb/>Lordship does who it is<lb/>that <gap/></note>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit 9 Novr 1802
Letter 3
Crown
A comment or two which drawn by the occasion from
the respectable pens to which we are indebted for the above
requested facts might be themselves trashed thus without comment.

Crown Ideology
Reformation
Conclusion

No 6. Philadelphia; 1793: Bradford.

In England says Judge Bradford (p.51) "a disposition to
"establish penitentiary houses has been discovered, and this
"rational expedient will probably be adopted when the Botany Bay
"scheme has been sufficiently tried."—Alas! the eye of the
worthy magistrate could not pierce through the curtain here:
little could he imagine either the force or
see neither the force nor the grounds, of the attachment
to "improved" Colonies.

Reformation
conclusion

No 7. Philadelphia; 1795: Liancourt

Page 39. "Doctor Hunter of York, in England, a physician who
"has been remarkably successful in the care of insanity, places his
"principal dependence on removing from the enraged patients all
"appearance of constraint; and assists, by a mild and gentle treatment,
"their return to reason. Will this comparison of criminals with mad-men
"appear preposterous? Surely it ought not. Nothing more is
"wanting, than to find men who will devote themselves, without
"relaxation, to this important work. And doubtless such are to be
"found in England.*

* Yes: such are to have to be found in England: and what is the treatment
they receive? "Such are to be found in England?—Yes; and
have been found.—And what is the treatment they have received?

What says your Lordship to this? is your Lordship ready
to subscribe? is your Lordships hand ready to confirm it to
your ? Is this a treason? Is this sound doctrine+
or is its more proper place in the chapter of romance?
or is in the only that it is to pass for law.
The possession is . I at any rate can not with
it: it was written neither by me nor for me nor with
[+] or is it that the rules of
office were made only
only for playthings for given
gentlemen. Offices themselves
built only to rid the rogues
of their possessions?
What says by security Mr
who in
his letter to me of
|^^^|
of our Lordships
most noble predecessors.
What says him given
the D of Portland.
What says your
Lordships
Mr Addington
thought of me I
do bid your
Lordship does who it is
that



Identifier: | JB/116/041/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-11-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

041

Info in main headings field

letter 3

Image

001

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham; john herbert koe

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

john herbert koe

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37574

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in