★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 Aug. 11.<lb/>Reformists reviewed</head> <p><note> Brougham<lb/> 1. Imperfections<lb/> IV. Party should not <lb/> make Judges<lb/> Pages 16.17.18.19.</note></p> <p><note> By Brougham five<lb/> pages of oratory to<lb/> demonstrate that<lb/> minsters ought not<lb/> to be influenced by<lb/> party in the choice<lb/> of Judges</note></p> <p><note>Ministers answer<lb/> that they agree to<lb/> that and <del>say</del> <add> that</add> they<lb/> never are so influenced</note></p> <p> Pages 16.17.18 <add>19</add> of our learned <gap/> 120 pages no fewer than <!-- number in pencil --> five<lb/>are expended in <del>pr</del> demonstrating that in the choice of person <lb/> for filling the high judicial situation Ministers ought not to be<lb/> determined by party situations. <unclear>Owens</unclear> however you view it<lb/> in his rotund orb <foreign><unclear>debent semper esse bona, et nunquam <lb/>esse mate</unclear></foreign> — <del>these of</del> the <add> a</add> <gap/> purpose of <del> his <gap/></del> a son<lb/> of his if he happen to have one <del>of</del> in the third form of Westminster<lb/> <del><gap/></del> School would have furnished him with this<lb/> assistance which would performed the work of all the eloquence<lb/> as together with a good deal more beyond it and <unclear>of out</unclear> side<lb/> of it. And now that the repudiation is made, has it<lb/> placed <add> brought</add> the Rules the nearer within his reach? We<lb/> doubt it. The demand is urgent: but the defence is<lb/> ready. Sir! we agree with you <del>completely</del> <add> <foreign>toto exacto;</foreign></add> In the exercise<lb/> of those high functions, <del>we <gap/></del> most true it is<lb/> never ought we to be <del>f</del> determined — no, Sir. not so much<lb/> as influenced — by <del>party</del> any such unworthy considerations — <lb/>No, Sir: and accordingly, Sir — we never are.<lb/> After hearing this speech <!-- brackets in pencil -->[and upon making his own dispatch<lb/> of his own triumphant <foreign><unclear>duodecima</unclear></foreign>] why did not M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel<lb/> stand up and make this answer? He <unclear>was and so</unclear> falls<lb/> equal to it.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1829 Aug. 11.
Reformists reviewed
Brougham
1. Imperfections
IV. Party should not
make Judges
Pages 16.17.18.19.
By Brougham five
pages of oratory to
demonstrate that
minsters ought not
to be influenced by
party in the choice
of Judges
Ministers answer
that they agree to
that and say that they
never are so influenced
Pages 16.17.18 19 of our learned 120 pages no fewer than five
are expended in pr demonstrating that in the choice of person
for filling the high judicial situation Ministers ought not to be
determined by party situations. Owens however you view it
in his rotund orb debent semper esse bona, et nunquam
esse mate — these of the a purpose of his a son
of his if he happen to have one of in the third form of Westminster
School would have furnished him with this
assistance which would performed the work of all the eloquence
as together with a good deal more beyond it and of out side
of it. And now that the repudiation is made, has it
placed brought the Rules the nearer within his reach? We
doubt it. The demand is urgent: but the defence is
ready. Sir! we agree with you completely toto exacto; In the exercise
of those high functions, we most true it is
never ought we to be f determined — no, Sir. not so much
as influenced — by party any such unworthy considerations —
No, Sir: and accordingly, Sir — we never are.
After hearing this speech [and upon making his own dispatch
of his own triumphant duodecima] why did not Mr Peel
stand up and make this answer? He was and so falls
equal to it.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/114/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08-11 |
not numbered |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
114 |
reformists reviewed |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
3811 |
|||
