JB/141/146/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/146/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>Punishment in alienam personam</head>
<head>Punishment <foreign>in alienam personam</foreign> - Incompetency</head>
<p>away for a penny. But the parties are both of them<lb/>
<p>away for a penny. But the parties are both of them<lb/>
miserably poor: they neither of them have a penny<lb/>
miserably poor: they neither of them have a penny<lb/>
to tempt me with. What then is there to induce<lb/>
to tempt me with. What then is there to induce<lb/>
me to give a false account of the matter? nothing<lb/>
me to give a false account of the matter? nothing,<lb/>
What then is the danger of admitting me? <del>to</del> none at<lb/>
What then is the danger of admitting me? <del>to</del> none at<lb/>
all. What the consequence of rejercting me? the<lb/>
all. What the consequence of rejecting me? the<lb/>
triumph of oppression. How in a case like this<lb/>
triumph of oppression. How in a case like this<lb/>
there is nothing singular nor improbable: a thousand
there is nothing singular nor improbable: a thousand<lb/>
such might a man figure to himself with ease.</p>
such might a man figure to himself with ease.</p>
Having proceeded thus far I will venture to advance<lb/>
 
this position that a man's testimony ought<lb/>
<p>Having proceeded thus far I will venture to advance<lb/>
<note>A witness might<add>therefore</add> not<lb/>
to be rejected even<lb/>
for Perjury</note> this position that a man's testimony ought<lb/>
not to be rejected at all events even for the crime of<lb/>
not to be rejected at all events even for the crime of<lb/>
Perjury: in not for Perjury, it will follow <hi rend="underline">a portion</hi><lb/>
Perjury: in not for Perjury, it will follow <hi rend="underline">a portion</hi><lb/>
not for any other crime. I will <add>just offer</add> <del>mention</del> a further<lb/>
consideration or two in support of this opinion: I<lb/>
will then give a short sketch of the evil consequences<lb/>
that result from such an absolute rejection:<lb/>
I will thirdly offer an expedient which<lb/>
I think would answer <add><del>be equally well calculated to produce the good effect</del></add> every good purpose of it: and<lb/>
lastly I will state the different degrees of reason there<lb/>
may be for extending the incapacity to the different<lb/>
crimes that may be proposed.</p>
<p>Now then let the crime of which the witness has been<lb/>
<note>A witness ought not<lb/>
to be rejected even<lb/>
for Perjury</note> convicted be that of Perjury. He has however no<lb/>
natural <del>inducement</del> <add>interest</add> to speak false: if he has, that<lb/>
forms another ground of disability which is not here<lb/>
in question.  If then he has an artificial interest<lb/>
it is the party that must give it him. But in<lb/>
this case the party must be a suborner: unless then<lb/>
he <del>have been</del> <add>found already</add> convicted of subornation on a former <add>occasion</add></p><pb/>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:39, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Punishment in alienam personam - Incompetency

away for a penny. But the parties are both of them
miserably poor: they neither of them have a penny
to tempt me with. What then is there to induce
me to give a false account of the matter? nothing,
What then is the danger of admitting me? to none at
all. What the consequence of rejecting me? the
triumph of oppression. How in a case like this
there is nothing singular nor improbable: a thousand
such might a man figure to himself with ease.

Having proceeded thus far I will venture to advance
A witness mighttherefore not
to be rejected even
for Perjury
this position that a man's testimony ought
not to be rejected at all events even for the crime of
Perjury: in not for Perjury, it will follow a portion
not for any other crime. I will just offer mention a further
consideration or two in support of this opinion: I
will then give a short sketch of the evil consequences
that result from such an absolute rejection:
I will thirdly offer an expedient which
I think would answer be equally well calculated to produce the good effect every good purpose of it: and
lastly I will state the different degrees of reason there
may be for extending the incapacity to the different
crimes that may be proposed.

Now then let the crime of which the witness has been
A witness ought not
to be rejected even
for Perjury
convicted be that of Perjury. He has however no
natural inducement interest to speak false: if he has, that
forms another ground of disability which is not here
in question. If then he has an artificial interest
it is the party that must give it him. But in
this case the party must be a suborner: unless then
he have been found already convicted of subornation on a former occasion


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/141/146/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

146

Info in main headings field

punishment in alienam personam

Image

002

Titles

incompetency

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f55 / f56 / f57 / f58

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48363

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in