JB/121/335/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/335/001: Difference between revisions

ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
and myself was designed to pass in the presence of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long<lb/>
and myself was designed to pass in the presence of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long<lb/>
<del>the object of</del> the summons seemed to have no other object<lb/>
<del>the object of</del> the summons seemed to have no other object<lb/>
than the proceeding between myself and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long <add>a sort of</add> <lb/>
than the producing between myself and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long <del>an</del> <add>a sort of</add> <lb/>
altercation for which they had prepared themselves, but <del>for</del> for which<lb/>
<del>altercation of which I could not see the use</del>
<del>altercation of which I could not see the use</del><lb/>
<add>altercation for which they had prepared themselves, but <del>for</del> for which</add><lb/>
<del>use</del> to me was another extreme surprize and to my<lb/>
<del>use</del> to me was another extreme surprize and to my<lb/>
apprehension of no possible good use.</p>
apprehension of no possible good use.</p>
<p>The conversation began <del>by an observation</del> on the part of<lb/>
<p>The conversation began <del>by an observation</del> on the part of<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> H. Addington by an observation directed to me.<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> H. Addington by an observation directed to me.<lb/>
Line 28: Line 29:
<p>No this could not be: M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vansittart was <add>just</add> then engaged:<lb/>
<p>No this could not be: M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vansittart was <add>just</add> then engaged:<lb/>
and since I was there something might be said in relation<lb/>
and since I was there something might be said in relation<lb/>
to <add>my</add> letter <del>of</del>. But<add>+</add> the charge of impatience was still<lb/>
to <del><gap/></del> <add>my</add> letter <del>of</del>. But<add>+</add> the charge of impatience was still<lb/>
harped upon, over and over, <del>as if it had had a real ground</del><lb/>
harped upon, over and over, <del>as if it had had a real ground</del><lb/>
just as if there had been a <del>real</del> ground for it. <add>How stood the fact in regard to impatience?</add> I had waited<lb/>
just as if there had been a <del>real</del> ground for it. <add>How stood the fact in regard to impatience?</add> I had waited<lb/>
for my answer from him already till the time for doing any thing upon<lb/>
for my answer from him already till the time for doing any thing upon<lb/>
<del>already till it was too late</del> <add>it was <gap/></add> I had written nothing. I had<lb/>
<del>already till it was too late</del> <add>it was <gap/></add> I had written nothing. I had<lb/>
said nothing&#x2014;I had done nothing: in a stick <add>dead man</add> or a stone could<lb/>
said nothing&#x2014;I had done nothing: a stick <add>dead man</add> or a stone could<lb/>
not have been more patient: and for this patience what was<lb/>
not have been more patient: and for this patience what was<lb/>
my reward? a <add>repeated</add> reprimand from the gentleman thus new in authority<lb/>
my reward? a <add>repeated</add> reprimand from the gentleman thus new in authority<lb/>
and for my impatience. I was with astonishment think to<lb/>
and for my impatience. I was with astonishment <del><gap/></del> think to [+]<lb/>
what further frauds<lb/>
[+]what further frauds<lb/>
this strange self-betraying<lb/>
this strange self-betraying<lb/>
bootless fraud could be<lb/>
bootless fraud could be<lb/>
Line 48: Line 49:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:32, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

23 Aug. 1802

9 July 1801

Ex Secretary, and that it appeared that every thing that
in this forced conference should pass between Mr H. Addington
and myself was designed to pass in the presence of Mr Long
the object of the summons seemed to have no other object
than the producing between myself and Mr Long an a sort of
altercation of which I could not see the use altercation for which they had prepared themselves, but for for which
use to me was another extreme surprize and to my
apprehension of no possible good use.

The conversation began by an observation on the part of
Mr H. Addington by an observation directed to me.
Mr H. Addington. Why Mr Bentham you are extremely impatient—very impatient indeed!
Mr Bentham. Impatient Sir? I really know not what
your meaning is—there must be some mistake in this. I never
asked for you: it was you asked for me. It was for
Mr Vansittart and him only that I asked for—and that
only because I had received from him a spontaneous
note, me to call upon him here. I have been
here these 2 or 3 hours. With your leave I will go to
him now: my fear is that he has never heard of my having
asked for him: while we are speaking he may be now thinking all this while that I have broken
my appointment and neglected him.

No this could not be: Mr Vansittart was just then engaged:
and since I was there something might be said in relation
to my letter of. But+ the charge of impatience was still
harped upon, over and over, as if it had had a real ground
just as if there had been a real ground for it. How stood the fact in regard to impatience? I had waited
for my answer from him already till the time for doing any thing upon
already till it was too late it was I had written nothing. I had
said nothing—I had done nothing: a stick dead man or a stone could
not have been more patient: and for this patience what was
my reward? a repeated reprimand from the gentleman thus new in authority
and for my impatience. I was with astonishment think to [+]
[+]what further frauds
this strange self-betraying
bootless fraud could be
a preface.

+ so satisfied was
the Honourable Gentleman
with the part
that had just been
put into his hand.



Identifier: | JB/121/335/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-08-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon versus New South Wales

Folio number

335

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F3

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in