JB/121/340/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/340/001: Difference between revisions

ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
promised to me: in the next place, that in the hypothetical<lb/>
promised to me: in the next place, that in the hypothetical<lb/>
position <add>discourse</add> on that subject, it is to the case of entire relinquishment<lb/>
position <add>discourse</add> on that subject, it is to the case of entire relinquishment<lb/>
that the talk of compensation is confined:&#x2014;confined<lb/>
that the talk of compensation is confined:<add>&#x2014;confined</add><lb/>
<add>by</add> in express words.</p>
in <add>by</add> express words.</p>
<p>So far as above I did say: what I did not<lb/>
<p>So far as above I did say: what I did not<lb/>
say was that of the two Honourable Gentlemen <add>thus jointly</add> who were<lb/>
say was that of the two Honourable Gentlemen <add>thus jointly</add> who were<lb/>
<note> whose <gap/> <add>associated</add> achievement<lb/>
was thus</note>
thus <add>vehement</add> joining in upbraiding me for unbelief, there was<lb/>
thus <add>vehement</add> joining in upbraiding me for unbelief, there was<lb/>
one at least who was confident in his own mind that<lb/>
one at least who was confident in his own mind that<lb/>
Line 17: Line 19:
<p>A fact which I know with as full assurance<lb/>
<p>A fact which I know with as full assurance<lb/>
as evidence can give, was&#x2014;that the sole cause of<lb/>
as evidence can give, was&#x2014;that the sole cause of<lb/>
<add>obstruction</add> <del>the demonstrated reluctance</del> operating on the Treasury, was<lb/>
<del>the demonstrated reluctance</del> <add>obstruction</add> operating on the Treasury, was<lb/>
the promise of <add>utter</add> relinquishment, made, <add>on the occasion</add> <del>at a time</del> I know<lb/>
the promise of <add>utter</add> relinquishment, made, <del>at a time</del> <add>on the occasion</add> I know<lb/>
of, to Lord Belgrave: and the existence of the establishment<lb/>
of, to Lord Belgrave: and the existence of the establishment<lb/>
upon any scale&#x2014;original&#x2014;augmented or reduced<lb/>
upon any scale&#x2014;original&#x2014;augmented or reduced<lb/>
was alike incompatible with that promise and the imaginations<lb/>
was alike incompatible with that promise and the imaginations<lb/>
that had exacted it.</p>
that had exacted it.</p>
<p>Accordingly in the letter to me&#x2014;<add>while of</add> <del>the only <gap/></del><lb/>
<p>Accordingly in the letter to me&#x2014; <del>the only <gap/></del> <add><del><gap/></del> while <del><gap/></del> of</add><lb/>
<del>manifestations</del> <add>at that time had been</add> ever intended to meet my eye; not even<lb/>
<del>manifestations</del> <add>at that time had been all the manifestations that have since been made was the only one that</add> ever intended to meet my eye; not even<lb/>
compensation <del>much less</del> for non-establishment&#x2014;much<lb/>
compensation <del>much less</del> for non-establishment&#x2014;much<lb/>
less establishment was promised. <add>On both points I was called upon</add> <del>I was to give no</del><lb/>
less establishment was promised. <del>I was to give no</del> <add>On both points I was called upon</add><lb/>
<add>to give</add> in my proposal, but in the evident view that<lb/>
<add>to give</add> in my proposal, but in the evident view that <del><gap/></del><lb/>
neither of them (unless possibly <del>under</del> some miserable<lb/>
neither of them (unless possibly <del>under</del> some miserable<lb/>
pittance under the name of compensation) should be <add>followed by</add> attended<lb/>
pittance under the name of compensation) should be <add>followed by</add> attended<lb/>
Line 39: Line 41:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:32, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

24 Aug. 1802

9 July 1800

entertained. Upon turning to the documents, it will appear
1. that no compensation even in any case was categorically
promised to me: in the next place, that in the hypothetical
position discourse on that subject, it is to the case of entire relinquishment
that the talk of compensation is confined:—confined
in by express words.

So far as above I did say: what I did not
say was that of the two Honourable Gentlemen thus jointly who were
whose associated achievement
was thus
thus vehement joining in upbraiding me for unbelief, there was
one at least who was confident in his own mind that
no such prediction would be ever verified.

A fact which I know with as full assurance
as evidence can give, was—that the sole cause of
the demonstrated reluctance obstruction operating on the Treasury, was
the promise of utter relinquishment, made, at a time on the occasion I know
of, to Lord Belgrave: and the existence of the establishment
upon any scale—original—augmented or reduced
was alike incompatible with that promise and the imaginations
that had exacted it.

Accordingly in the letter to me— the only while of
manifestations at that time had been all the manifestations that have since been made was the only one that ever intended to meet my eye; not even
compensation much less for non-establishment—much
less establishment was promised. I was to give no On both points I was called upon
to give in my proposal, but in the evident view that
neither of them (unless possibly under some miserable
pittance under the name of compensation) should be followed by attended
with any effect. If Should any thing be found
in them to act they were to be pronounced in express terms
inadmissible. Should they be appear found impregnable on all points
they were to be answered of course+ by the habitual silence.

+ as so many other
applications from the same quarter had been
answered.



Identifier: | JB/121/340/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-08-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon versus New South Wales

Folio number

340

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F8

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in