JB/014/245/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/245/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1819 Aug. 12</p>
<head>Deontology 1 Theoretical</head>
<note>Ch. Pride and Vanity</note>
<p><del>3</del>4</p>
 
<p>When used in a good cause, the nature <add>quality</add> ascribed to it is that<lb/>
of Virtue: when in a bad cause, that of <hi rend="underline">Vice</hi></p>
 
<p>Taken by itself <del>pride</del> namely <add>i.e.</add> without an adjunct, <hi rend="underline">pride</hi><lb/>
is scarcely ever used otherwise than in a bad sense. With a suitable<lb/>
adjunct it is indeed <add>may indeed be</add> sometimes used in a good sense:<lb/>
witness, honest, becoming, dignified pride. But even here the<lb/>
<unclear>nature/notice</unclear> of a want of strict propriety is apt to attach to it. If <add><unclear>taken</unclear></add> thus employed <note>the sense given to it<lb/>
is <del>regard</del> <add>apt to</add> present itself<lb/>
as being somewhat of<lb/>
the figurative and rhetorical<lb/>
cast.</note></p>
 
<p><add>Pride, the word itself, <unclear>yet</unclear></add> Not so its conjugate <hi rend="underline">proud</hi>: at any rate when applied<lb/>
to a man <add>a</add>, and <add>it is</add> employed to denote <add>this part of the character or</add> the cast of mind of the man,<lb/>
say a proud man, the intimation you thereby give is &#x2014; that so<lb/>
far as regards this part of it his cast of mind is <sic>vitious</sic></p>
 
<p>A <hi rend="underline">proud day</hi> &#x2014; you may say: a <hi rend="underline">proud situation</hi> you<lb/>
may say: and in this indirect way give intimation of an occasion<lb/>
on which though pride may be ascribed to a man, <del>yet not</del> <add>without its</add><lb/>
being <del>V<gap/></del> <add>a</add> <sic>vitious</sic> pride.</p>
 
<p>Vanity is still worse dealt with. Vanity you can scarcely<lb/>
ascribe to a man without marking him out as being, so far<lb/>
as concerns this part of his character, <del>unfit</del> an object of<lb/>
contempt or disesteem: an object, and that a fit one. Scarcely<lb/>
has <del><gap/></del> ever been said scarcely without impropriety could be<lb/>
said, honest, becoming, dignified vanity.</p>
 
<p>A <del>vain</del> <add>proud</add> day you have <add>may say</add>: a proud situation you may<lb/>
say. But a vain day you can not say: a vain day, nor<lb/>
yet a vain situation.</p>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Aug. 12

Deontology 1 Theoretical Ch. Pride and Vanity

34

When used in a good cause, the nature quality ascribed to it is that
of Virtue: when in a bad cause, that of Vice

Taken by itself pride namely i.e. without an adjunct, pride
is scarcely ever used otherwise than in a bad sense. With a suitable
adjunct it is indeed may indeed be sometimes used in a good sense:
witness, honest, becoming, dignified pride. But even here the
nature/notice of a want of strict propriety is apt to attach to it. If taken thus employed the sense given to it
is regard apt to present itself
as being somewhat of
the figurative and rhetorical
cast.

Pride, the word itself, yet Not so its conjugate proud: at any rate when applied
to a man a, and it is employed to denote this part of the character or the cast of mind of the man,
say a proud man, the intimation you thereby give is — that so
far as regards this part of it his cast of mind is vitious

A proud day — you may say: a proud situation you
may say: and in this indirect way give intimation of an occasion
on which though pride may be ascribed to a man, yet not without its
being V a vitious pride.

Vanity is still worse dealt with. Vanity you can scarcely
ascribe to a man without marking him out as being, so far
as concerns this part of his character, unfit an object of
contempt or disesteem: an object, and that a fit one. Scarcely
has ever been said scarcely without impropriety could be
said, honest, becoming, dignified vanity.

A vain proud day you have may say: a proud situation you may
say. But a vain day you can not say: a vain day, nor
yet a vain situation.




Identifier: | JB/014/245/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1819-08-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

245

Info in main headings field

deontology i theoretical

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5008

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in