JB/014/258/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/258/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1819</p>
<head>Deontology</head> <note>Theory</note>
<p>3</p>
<note>The Passions</note>
 
<p>Yet commonly much more mischievous<lb/>
violation of the law of self regarding<lb/>
prudence. The passion can not receive <sic>it's</sic><lb/>
gratification but pain is produced in the breast<lb/>
of the individual by whose act the passion<lb/>
has been excited; but neither in his breast<lb/>
can it have been productive of that effect<lb/>
without producing in that same breast <del><gap/><lb/>
<gap/></del> in so far as he is <sic>apprized</sic> of the <lb/>
cause whereby that pain has been produced<lb/>
a counter desire to giver birth on his part<lb/>
to <del>pain <gap/></del> pain in the breast of him<lb/>
by whom his pain has been produced. To<lb/>
the first pain viz. that which has<lb/>
accompanied the birth of the passion of<lb/>
anger there is always a termination &amp;<lb/>
that commonly a speedy one; but to the<lb/>
second &amp; remote pain which may have<lb/>
<del>been the</del> constituted the third link in<lb/>
the chain of causes &amp; effects there is<lb/>
no certain termination; in the breasts<lb/>
of the party of whom vengeance, as the<lb/>
phrase is has been taken anger in<lb/>
the more durable form, in which it is<lb/>
called enmity has been created, and to<lb/>
the duration of this permanent passion<lb/>
or to the quantity of mischief to which [+]<lb/>
<note>[+] it may happen<lb/>
to give birth no<lb/>
determinate limits<lb/>
can be assigned.</note></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819

Deontology Theory

3

The Passions

Yet commonly much more mischievous
violation of the law of self regarding
prudence. The passion can not receive it's
gratification but pain is produced in the breast
of the individual by whose act the passion
has been excited; but neither in his breast
can it have been productive of that effect
without producing in that same breast
in so far as he is apprized of the
cause whereby that pain has been produced
a counter desire to giver birth on his part
to pain pain in the breast of him
by whom his pain has been produced. To
the first pain viz. that which has
accompanied the birth of the passion of
anger there is always a termination &
that commonly a speedy one; but to the
second & remote pain which may have
been the constituted the third link in
the chain of causes & effects there is
no certain termination; in the breasts
of the party of whom vengeance, as the
phrase is has been taken anger in
the more durable form, in which it is
called enmity has been created, and to
the duration of this permanent passion
or to the quantity of mischief to which [+]
[+] it may happen
to give birth no
determinate limits
can be assigned.




Identifier: | JB/014/258/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1819

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

258

Info in main headings field

deontology

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1816

Notes public

ID Number

5021

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in