JB/014/337/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/337/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1829 June 7 + G.3</p>
<head>Article <del><gap/></del> on Utilitarianism</head> <note>25</note>
<p>3</p>
 
<note>38.<lb/>
As to want of an apt<lb/>
appellative see Statute<lb/>
Book. At the Union<lb/>
we had Kingdom of Great<lb/>
Britain &amp; Ireland</note>
 
<note>39.<lb/>
For thus placing these<lb/>
substantives in apposition<lb/>
in Statute Book the<lb/>
Sovereign power was adequate:<lb/>
not so to plant <add>establish</add> the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">possession-indicating</hi> and<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">predication effecting</hi> conjugates<lb/>
British and Irish<lb/>
&#x2014; the things signified by<lb/>
them being different, as<lb/>
religion, interests, affections</note>
 
<p>Of the want of an apt appelative, apt <add>in this way</add> to the<lb/>
purpose of receiving conjugates an example may be seen<lb/>
in the storehouse <add>repository</add> of imperfection of all sorts and sizes,<lb/>
&#x2014; the Statute Book. Thus on the occasion of the Irish Union;<lb/>
When the operation <del>was</del> came to be performed the two kingdoms<lb/>
that of Great Britain and that of Ireland came to be spliced<lb/>
together and joined into one, and for that purpose, of necessity<lb/>
spoken of as being one, Kingdom of Great Britain and<lb/>
Ireland was accordingly the <unclear>appellate</unclear> framed for this purpose<lb/>
and inserted first in the vellum of the Parliament Offices the and<lb/>
from thence in the paper of the <gap/> Office, by law-learned<lb/>
hands. Clumsy as it was, <del>in</del> this substantive, as such<lb/>
was not altogether incapable of being put to use. But the<lb/>
operation of enactment was not the only operation for the purpose<lb/>
of which <add>need for</add> an appellative in this form was needed <add>had place</add>, the<lb/>
Statute book was not the only publication in which this same<lb/>
Kingdom required to be spoken of. P<gap/> came the demand<lb/>
for a conjugate in the grammatical form of a <unclear>noun</unclear> adjective &#x2014; serving <add>performing</add><lb/>
<add>the <del><gap/></del></add> <add>function</add> <add>of a substantive</add> as an equivalent of <del>a ger</del> the gerundic case of the substantive.<lb/>
For <add>For the purpose of</add> forcing together <add>on the <del><gap/></del> <unclear>leaves</unclear> of the Statute book</add> in a state of mutual <hi rend="underline">apposition</hi> the two<lb/>
substantives Great Britain Ireland with the conjunction and between<lb/>
them the power of the Sovereign of the British Empire was<lb/>
not <add>found</add> inadequate. But if to the <del>adding to</del> planting in the stock<lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">possessive-indicating</hi> and predicative-effecting conjugate<lb/>
British and Irish any attempt was made, it stuck at<lb/>
the stage of inclination, consummation was found impracticable.<lb/>
British-and-Irish interests British and Irish affections,<lb/>
British and Irish religion &#x2014; <del>correspondent to</del> when these<lb/>
locutions are brought to view correspondent to the difficulty of<lb/>
bringing into union the <hi rend="underline">things signified</hi> was found the difficulty<lb/>
of bringing into the like state <del><gap/></del> these <add>same</add> signs of them. British<lb/>
interests being one sort of thing, Irish interests were found or<lb/>
<add>thought</add><lb/>
<note>thought, or said to be<lb/>
<gap/> and very different<lb/>
sort of thing: and so<lb/>
in regard to <hi rend="underline">affections</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">religion</hi>, and but too<lb/>
many other subject matters of thought, action, and discourse that might be named.</note></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1829 June 7 + G.3

Article on Utilitarianism 25

3

38.
As to want of an apt
appellative see Statute
Book. At the Union
we had Kingdom of Great
Britain & Ireland

39.
For thus placing these
substantives in apposition
in Statute Book the
Sovereign power was adequate:
not so to plant establish the
possession-indicating and
predication effecting conjugates
British and Irish
— the things signified by
them being different, as
religion, interests, affections

Of the want of an apt appelative, apt in this way to the
purpose of receiving conjugates an example may be seen
in the storehouse repository of imperfection of all sorts and sizes,
— the Statute Book. Thus on the occasion of the Irish Union;
When the operation was came to be performed the two kingdoms
that of Great Britain and that of Ireland came to be spliced
together and joined into one, and for that purpose, of necessity
spoken of as being one, Kingdom of Great Britain and
Ireland was accordingly the appellate framed for this purpose
and inserted first in the vellum of the Parliament Offices the and
from thence in the paper of the Office, by law-learned
hands. Clumsy as it was, in this substantive, as such
was not altogether incapable of being put to use. But the
operation of enactment was not the only operation for the purpose
of which need for an appellative in this form was needed had place, the
Statute book was not the only publication in which this same
Kingdom required to be spoken of. P came the demand
for a conjugate in the grammatical form of a noun adjective — serving performing
the function of a substantive as an equivalent of a ger the gerundic case of the substantive.
For For the purpose of forcing together on the leaves of the Statute book in a state of mutual apposition the two
substantives Great Britain Ireland with the conjunction and between
them the power of the Sovereign of the British Empire was
not found inadequate. But if to the adding to planting in the stock
the possessive-indicating and predicative-effecting conjugate
British and Irish any attempt was made, it stuck at
the stage of inclination, consummation was found impracticable.
British-and-Irish interests British and Irish affections,
British and Irish religion — correspondent to when these
locutions are brought to view correspondent to the difficulty of
bringing into union the things signified was found the difficulty
of bringing into the like state these same signs of them. British
interests being one sort of thing, Irish interests were found or
thought
thought, or said to be
and very different
sort of thing: and so
in regard to affections
religion, and but too
many other subject matters of thought, action, and discourse that might be named.




Identifier: | JB/014/337/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1829-06-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

38-39

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

337

Info in main headings field

article on utilitarianism

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / f25

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

richard doane

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

5100

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in