JB/014/446/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/446/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<note>33</note>
<p>
When the 'Introduction to Morals &amp; Legislation' was <del>first</del> published<lb/>
Bentham imagined that the principle of sympathy &amp; antipathy was to<lb/>
be considered the groundwork of one of the theories of morals. In after<lb/>
life he discovered that this was only the dogmatic, or ipse-dixit<lb/>
principle divided into two branches :- the branch of sympathy<lb/>
applying reward, &#x2014; that of antipathy punishment &#x2014; but wherever disassociated<lb/>
from the greatest happiness principle, being really nothing but the<lb/>
authority of the ipse-dixit doctrine</p>


<!-- At this point another page of script has been fixed over the original -->


<head>1829 June 6</head>
<note>H.2</note>
<head>Article on Utilitarianism</head>
<note>(2 28</note>
<p>The principle of caprice was the appellative that afterw<hi rend="superscript">ds</hi><lb/>
occurred to and has been employed by him for the designat<hi rend="superscript">n</hi>.<lb/>
of that branch of the ipse dixit principle which applies to<lb/>
the civil or <del>say</del> non-penal branch of law including<lb/>
every portion not comprised within the denominat<hi rend="superscript">n</hi>. of the<lb/>
penal: the civil or <del>say</del> non-penal over which in his view of <add><del>system</del></add><lb/>
the matter <del>we shall find <add>have found</add> presiding</del> the non-disappointm<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>.<lb/>
principle presides.</p>
<!-- The following note has been struck through -->
<note>45.<lb/>Virtue &amp; Vice, one conduces<lb/>to happiness the other<lb/>to unhappiness : <del><gap/></del> adjunct<lb/>to virtue, self denial<lb/>i.e. sacrifice of present<lb/>good to supposed<lb/>future d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. <del>No</del> such sacrifice<lb/>scarcely ever made : ex.<lb/>pleasures of sense in general.</note>
<p>To return to virtue &amp; vice. By virtue under<lb/>
the direction of the <del>gre<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>.</del> <add>Greatest</add> happiness<del><hi rend="superscript">ss</hi></del> <del>prin<hi rend="superscript">e</hi>.</del> <add>principle</add> <add>is  understood</add> that line of conduct<lb/>
&amp; correspondent disposition wh<hi rend="superscript">h</hi>. is conducive to happiness:<lb/>
by vice that wh<hi rend="superscript">h</hi>. is conducive to unhappiness<hi rend="superscript"><del>ss</del></hi> In the case of<lb/>
the virtue one <del>adjunct</del> <add>addition</add> however and that productive of<lb/>
a limitative effect requires to be made ; this is that<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> of the <add>sort of</add> action denominated virtuous the<lb/>
exercise requires more or less of self-denial: that is<lb/>
to say of a sacrifice made of the present good<lb/>
<add>whether pleasure or exemption from pain</add> to some greater good to come. For keeping the position<lb/>
in question within the pale of truth this limitative adjunct<lb/>
is altogether indispensable. <unclear>For</unclear> see now whether it be<lb/>
not so. Among the actions by the exercise of which<lb/>
the existence of the individual is continued and among<lb/>
them of those by which pleasure<hi rend="superscript"><del>e</del></hi> is experienced or<lb/>
pain averted & excluded small is the proportion of those<lb/>
by wh<hi rend="superscript">h</hi>. virtue in any shape can with propriety be<lb/>
said to be exercised. Why? Because in the exercise<lb/>
made of them no self-denial no sacrifice of the<lb/>
present to the future good is made <add>performed</add>. Thus it<lb/>
is for example with the pleasures of sense in general..<lb/></p>
<!-- The following note has been struck through -->
<note>46.<lb/>But if a man has<lb/>his desires <add>so</add> under control<lb/>that the sacrifice causes no<lb/>uneasiness, will you say<lb/>his virtue is on a lower level<lb/>in his mental frame, because<lb/>there is no self denial?</note>
<p>
But, here comes in an objection. Suppose a man<lb/>
to have his appetites &amp; desires of all sorts in such <add>complete</add><lb/>
subjection, that, in the sacrifice of the lesser present<lb/>
to the greater future good no uneasiness is experienced:-<lb/>
nothing that can be called <hi rend="underline">self-denial</hi><lb/>
is practised. <add>Of such a man</add> will you <del>in this case</del> say, <del>of such a man</del>-<lb/>
that, in his <del>composition</del> <add>mental frame</add> virtue is <del>at</del> <add>on</add> a lower<lb/>
level, in the scale of perfection, than in the case of<lb/>
one in whom the contest between the lesser present<lb/>
&amp; greater future good, <del>is continually renewed</del> or, according<lb/>
to Dean Swift's emblem, the game of leap-frog between<lb/>
flesh &amp; spirit, is continually renewed?</p>
<p><add>No</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

33

When the 'Introduction to Morals & Legislation' was first published
Bentham imagined that the principle of sympathy & antipathy was to
be considered the groundwork of one of the theories of morals. In after
life he discovered that this was only the dogmatic, or ipse-dixit
principle divided into two branches :- the branch of sympathy
applying reward, — that of antipathy punishment — but wherever disassociated
from the greatest happiness principle, being really nothing but the
authority of the ipse-dixit doctrine


1829 June 6 H.2 Article on Utilitarianism (2 28

The principle of caprice was the appellative that afterwds
occurred to and has been employed by him for the designatn.
of that branch of the ipse dixit principle which applies to
the civil or say non-penal branch of law including
every portion not comprised within the denominatn. of the
penal: the civil or say non-penal over which in his view of system
the matter we shall find have found presiding the non-disappointmt.
principle presides.

45.
Virtue & Vice, one conduces
to happiness the other
to unhappiness : adjunct
to virtue, self denial
i.e. sacrifice of present
good to supposed
future do. No such sacrifice
scarcely ever made : ex.
pleasures of sense in general.

To return to virtue & vice. By virtue under
the direction of the gret. Greatest happinessss prine. principle is understood that line of conduct
& correspondent disposition whh. is conducive to happiness:
by vice that whh. is conducive to unhappinessss In the case of
the virtue one adjunct addition however and that productive of
a limitative effect requires to be made ; this is that
of the sort of action denominated virtuous the
exercise requires more or less of self-denial: that is
to say of a sacrifice made of the present good
whether pleasure or exemption from pain to some greater good to come. For keeping the position
in question within the pale of truth this limitative adjunct
is altogether indispensable. For see now whether it be
not so. Among the actions by the exercise of which
the existence of the individual is continued and among
them of those by which pleasuree is experienced or
pain averted & excluded small is the proportion of those
by whh. virtue in any shape can with propriety be
said to be exercised. Why? Because in the exercise
made of them no self-denial no sacrifice of the
present to the future good is made performed. Thus it
is for example with the pleasures of sense in general..

46.
But if a man has
his desires so under control
that the sacrifice causes no
uneasiness, will you say
his virtue is on a lower level
in his mental frame, because
there is no self denial?

But, here comes in an objection. Suppose a man
to have his appetites & desires of all sorts in such complete
subjection, that, in the sacrifice of the lesser present
to the greater future good no uneasiness is experienced:-
nothing that can be called self-denial
is practised. Of such a man will you in this case say, of such a man-
that, in his composition mental frame virtue is at on a lower
level, in the scale of perfection, than in the case of
one in whom the contest between the lesser present
& greater future good, is continually renewed or, according
to Dean Swift's emblem, the game of leap-frog between
flesh & spirit, is continually renewed?

No



Identifier: | JB/014/446/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

446a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 446.

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

linking material

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f33

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

1831

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1831

Notes public

ID Number

5209

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in