JB/047/076/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/047/076/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/076/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/076/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1806<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>3.  Exception the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.  Testimony collected in the epistolary<lb/>
 
mode;  collected in the case of the defendant when, in <add>under</add><lb/>
 
English Equity.</p>
<p>This practice <del>had a <gap/> right to</del> <add>claimed</add> a place on the list<lb/>
of exceptions, by more titles than one.</p>
<p>1.  In this way, existence was given to causes, which<lb/>
in the Common Law mode could not have received existence.<lb/>
<del>See</del> For particulars, see the Chapter on the Mendacity-licence.</p>
<p>2.  In this shape, each cause produced more business,<lb/>
abundantly more, than the same cause would have produced<lb/>
had the evidence been put <add>delivered</add> in the <add>affidavit</add> shape.  The<lb/>
contents of an Answer are a mass of evidence.  To<lb/>
this mass Equity adds a preceding mass – the Bill<lb/>
composed of the questions by which that evidence is to<lb/>
be extracted, besides a story which must be positive, but<lb/>
need not have a word of truth in it, and is not evidence.<lb/>
Add to this addition, which is indispensable in all cases,<lb/>
Amendments upon amendments, in the Bill, additions upon<lb/>
additions to the answer – Exceptions upon exceptions to<lb/>
the Answer with its additions;  arguments upon arguments on<lb/>
the exceptions.</p>
<p><del>Other</del> Another <del>exception</del> <add>example</add> or two <add>wearing the appearance of exceptions,</add> may be seen in the Note<lb/>
to the first section.  But in these instances, the <del>offi</del> functionary<lb/>
by whom the evidence is collected in a shape different from<lb/>
that of affidavit evidence, is not a superior Judge, <add>with</add> recognized under the title of Judge, but a subordinate, <del>who does</del> <add>by whom</add><lb/>
the business, though in truth of a judicial nature is done in a<lb/>
closet, under the controul of his superior, <del>the Judge</del> who to the function, adds the name of a Judge.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:42, 13 May 2022

Click Here To Edit

Decr 1806
Evidence

3. Exception the 3d. Testimony collected in the epistolary
mode; collected in the case of the defendant when, in under
English Equity.

This practice had a right to claimed a place on the list
of exceptions, by more titles than one.

1. In this way, existence was given to causes, which
in the Common Law mode could not have received existence.
See For particulars, see the Chapter on the Mendacity-licence.

2. In this shape, each cause produced more business,
abundantly more, than the same cause would have produced
had the evidence been put delivered in the affidavit shape. The
contents of an Answer are a mass of evidence. To
this mass Equity adds a preceding mass – the Bill
composed of the questions by which that evidence is to
be extracted, besides a story which must be positive, but
need not have a word of truth in it, and is not evidence.
Add to this addition, which is indispensable in all cases,
Amendments upon amendments, in the Bill, additions upon
additions to the answer – Exceptions upon exceptions to
the Answer with its additions; arguments upon arguments on
the exceptions.

Other Another exception example or two wearing the appearance of exceptions, may be seen in the Note
to the first section. But in these instances, the offi functionary
by whom the evidence is collected in a shape different from
that of affidavit evidence, is not a superior Judge, with recognized under the title of Judge, but a subordinate, who does by whom
the business, though in truth of a judicial nature is done in a
closet, under the controul of his superior, the Judge who to the function, adds the name of a Judge.


Identifier: | JB/047/076/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1806-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

076

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

14944

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in