JB/052/075/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/052/075/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1825. Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 31.<lb/></head>
<head>Procedure Code.<lb/></head>
 
<head>1.<lb/></head>
<p>Where Examinees in<lb/>
different judicatories<lb/>
the circumstance<lb/>
may appear to produce<lb/>
a complexity<lb/>
requiring a change<lb/>
in these provisions.<lb/></p>
 
<head>2.</head>
<p>But the complication<lb/>
not chargeable to the<lb/>
accounts of the provisions<lb/>
here made.<lb/>
</p>
 
<head>3.</head>
<p>Under English as<lb/>
well as under any<lb/>
other system, the complication<lb/>
has place<lb/></p>
 
<head>4.</head>
<p>Under English system,<lb/>
inadequate provision.</p>
 
<head>5.</head>
<p>In the case of a<lb/>
party, no <unclear>mal</unclear> examination.<lb/></p>
 
<head>6.</head>
<p>Epistolary examination<lb/>
applicable only<lb/>
to one party in the<lb/>
narrow circle of Equity<lb/>
procedure, and<lb/>
in no other case.<lb/></p>
 
<head>7.</head>
<p>But, if subservient<lb/>
to justice in one<lb/>
case, why not in every<lb/>
case.<lb/></p>
 
<head>8.</head>
<p>Extraneous witnesses<lb/>
examined in no<lb/>
place but before a<lb/>
Jury.<lb/></p>
 
<head>9.</head>
<p>In a proposed code,<lb/>
universal admission<lb/>
of Evidence at<lb/>
Judges's discretion.<lb/></p>
 
<note><unclear>6 II</unclear><lb/>
Ch IV<lb/>
<del>Ch. IX.</del> Intermediate Proceedings<lb/>
S.9. Examination process.<lb/></note>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:56, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1825. Jany 31.
Procedure Code.

1.

Where Examinees in
different judicatories
the circumstance
may appear to produce
a complexity
requiring a change
in these provisions.

2.

But the complication
not chargeable to the
accounts of the provisions
here made.

3.

Under English as
well as under any
other system, the complication
has place

4.

Under English system,
inadequate provision.

5.

In the case of a
party, no mal examination.

6.

Epistolary examination
applicable only
to one party in the
narrow circle of Equity
procedure, and
in no other case.

7.

But, if subservient
to justice in one
case, why not in every
case.

8.

Extraneous witnesses
examined in no
place but before a
Jury.

9.

In a proposed code,
universal admission
of Evidence at
Judges's discretion.

6 II
Ch IV
Ch. IX. Intermediate Proceedings
S.9. Examination process.









Identifier: | JB/052/075/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1825-01-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-9

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

075

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16748

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in