★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
Auto approved |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1823. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><hi rend="underline">..</hi> 19</p> | |||
<p><del>Constitutional Code</del> <add>Procedure Code</add> <del>Inactive Parts</del></p> | |||
<note>IV Instructions<lb/> | |||
Ch. Evidence<lb/> | |||
S. Procured, how<lb/> | |||
§. Mode of Procurement<lb/> | |||
- mo<gap/>gaborial<lb/> | |||
Romanici<lb/> | |||
1<lb/> | |||
Investigatorial procedure<lb/> | |||
Roman & English widely<lb/> | |||
different both defective</note><lb/> | |||
<head>Instructions</head> | |||
<p>Widely different in relation to investigatorial procedure in<lb/> | |||
the characters of Roman-bred and English-bred procedure. <unclear>heavy</unclear><lb/> | |||
with imperfection both of them.</p> | |||
<p>As to Roman-bred procedure, throughout the penal<lb/> | |||
branch of the field of law <add>solitary and extensive has been the application</add> <del>it has gone along <gap/> <gap/></del> <note>2<lb/> | |||
In Romebred procedure<lb/> | |||
in the nonpenal branch<lb/> | |||
scanty provision</note><lb/> | |||
<add>given to such provision as it has made: in the non-penal branch</add> <del>and the provision it has made has been</del> <lb/> | |||
on the other hand it <del>has been</del> the provision has been comparatively<lb/> | |||
scanty, the <add>care</add> schedule remiss.</p> | |||
<note>3<lb/> | |||
To <add>simply</add>indicating evidence<lb/> | |||
character given of appropriate<lb/> | |||
evidence</note><lb/> | |||
<p>At the same time for each of a clear and correct <lb/> | |||
concept of the difference between appropriate and simply indicative<lb/> | |||
evidence it has given to evidence which has been <lb/> | |||
simply indicative the effect of appropriative evidence: for the<lb/> | |||
affair of Ca<gap/> for example to such a length he did this<lb/> | |||
confusion p<gap/>d that <add>when</add> between <del>the</del> in simple indicative evidence<lb/> | |||
presented to the Judge and the appropriate evidence supposing<lb/> | |||
any to exist there were four or five b<gap/>s of <add>alledged</add> simply<lb/> | |||
<del>evi</del> indicative evidence interposed, it has notwithstanding<lb/> | |||
been received and made to operate <del>in the clear</del> as if it had been<lb/> | |||
appropriate evidence. Standing before the Judges I said A<lb/> | |||
heard from B that he <add>had</add> heard from C that C said he <add>had</add> heard from<lb/> | |||
D that <add>he had heard from E that</add>E saw done | |||
<del>the deed which is worth the <gap/> of</del> <add>by the accuser the deed with</add><lb/> | |||
which the accused is charged.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1823. Octr.. 19
Constitutional Code Procedure Code Inactive Parts
IV Instructions
Ch. Evidence
S. Procured, how
§. Mode of Procurement
- mogaborial
Romanici
1
Investigatorial procedure
Roman & English widely
different both defective
Instructions
Widely different in relation to investigatorial procedure in
the characters of Roman-bred and English-bred procedure. heavy
with imperfection both of them.
As to Roman-bred procedure, throughout the penal
branch of the field of law solitary and extensive has been the application it has gone along 2
In Romebred procedure
in the nonpenal branch
scanty provision
given to such provision as it has made: in the non-penal branch and the provision it has made has been
on the other hand it has been the provision has been comparatively
scanty, the care schedule remiss.
3
To simplyindicating evidence
character given of appropriate
evidence
At the same time for each of a clear and correct
concept of the difference between appropriate and simply indicative
evidence it has given to evidence which has been
simply indicative the effect of appropriative evidence: for the
affair of Ca for example to such a length he did this
confusion pd that when between the in simple indicative evidence
presented to the Judge and the appropriate evidence supposing
any to exist there were four or five bs of alledged simply
evi indicative evidence interposed, it has notwithstanding
been received and made to operate in the clear as if it had been
appropriate evidence. Standing before the Judges I said A
heard from B that he had heard from C that C said he had heard from
D that he had heard from E thatE saw done
the deed which is worth the of by the accuser the deed with
which the accused is charged.
Identifier: | JB/052/350/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1823-10-15 |
1-3 |
||
052 |
procedure code |
||
350 |
procedure code |
||
001 |
instructions |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
17023 |
|||