★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
Auto approved |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1826. July 20</p> | |||
<head>Procedure <del>Penal</del> Code.</head> | |||
<note>Ch. Initiative Application Lites<add>contestational</add> <lb/> | |||
S.2. Judges agenda consequential</note><lb/> | |||
<note>2<lb/> | |||
Pursuer being constituted<lb/> | |||
- subseqential<lb/> | |||
operations & affecting<lb/> | |||
persons alone 2 affecting<lb/> | |||
things alone 3 applying<lb/> | |||
to persons & things</note><lb/> | |||
<p>Art. The <add>Seat simply petition or <unclear>mealfatise</unclear></add> <del>examination of the</del> applicant being established<lb/> | |||
in the character of a litiscontestational applicant is my<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Pursuer</hi>, and a <add>correspondent</add> memorandum entered in the Register from being<lb/> | |||
will have to consider the next <gap/> operation a assemblage of operations<lb/> | |||
which the nature of the case requires <gap/> <gap/></p> | |||
<note>3<lb/> | |||
Next operation<lb/> | |||
i<gap/>ual of 2. Proposed<lb/> | |||
Defendants attendance<lb/> | |||
requiring mandate 2.<lb/> | |||
Proposed defendants<lb/> | |||
examinative mandate</note><lb/> | |||
<p>These operations may be either operation <add>applying</add> affecting persons when<lb/> | |||
as operations affording things when is operation applying to <add><gap/>able</add> person<lb/> | |||
and thing</p> | |||
<p>Art. Exception excepted the name operation will<lb/> | |||
be performed by the issuing of a<add>proposed</add> Defendants attendance - requiring<lb/> | |||
mandate or <del>2</del> in case of defendants more than one an <unclear>Allowance</unclear> <lb/> | |||
requiring mandate for each. or|2. a proposed Defendants Examination<lb/> | |||
mandate or say <hi rend="underline">Examination paper</hi> and so where<lb/> | |||
there are proposed Defendants more than one <del><gap/></del> defendants<lb/> | |||
Examination paper <unclear>addressed</unclear> to each: the <add>proposed</add> Defendant being in <lb/> | |||
this case the <add>only</add> person addressed in the first place</p> | |||
<note>4<lb/> | |||
Exceptions where<lb/> | |||
to judge appears more<lb/> | |||
advantageous to issue<lb/> | |||
previously attendance<lb/> | |||
requiring on Examination<lb/> | |||
mandates to<lb/> | |||
other actors on the<lb/> | |||
Judicial theatre.</note> | |||
<p>3. Art Exceptions are where <add>on consideration</add> <del>upon hearing the</del> of it<lb/> | |||
state of the case as resulting from the examination of the Applicant<lb/> | |||
as entered in the Record it appears to the Judge that the purposes<lb/> | |||
of justice may be more effectually accomplished by the simultaneous<lb/> | |||
or previous issuing of <del>mandate</del> Attendance requiring<lb/> | |||
or Examination <del>mandate</del> as the case may appear to require<lb/> | |||
addressed to a proposal Copursuer or is a <del>proposed</del><add>supposed</add> Evidence holder<lb/> | |||
and proposed <del>Evidence</del> furnishes of evidence personal, real or<lb/> | |||
within, or <add>of</add> all three sorts or any two thereof, as the case may be</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1826. July 20
Procedure Penal Code.
Ch. Initiative Application Litescontestational
S.2. Judges agenda consequential
2
Pursuer being constituted
- subseqential
operations & affecting
persons alone 2 affecting
things alone 3 applying
to persons & things
Art. The Seat simply petition or mealfatise examination of the applicant being established
in the character of a litiscontestational applicant is my
Pursuer, and a correspondent memorandum entered in the Register from being
will have to consider the next operation a assemblage of operations
which the nature of the case requires
3
Next operation
iual of 2. Proposed
Defendants attendance
requiring mandate 2.
Proposed defendants
examinative mandate
These operations may be either operation applying affecting persons when
as operations affording things when is operation applying to able person
and thing
Art. Exception excepted the name operation will
be performed by the issuing of aproposed Defendants attendance - requiring
mandate or 2 in case of defendants more than one an Allowance
requiring mandate for each. or|2. a proposed Defendants Examination
mandate or say Examination paper and so where
there are proposed Defendants more than one defendants
Examination paper addressed to each: the proposed Defendant being in
this case the only person addressed in the first place
4
Exceptions where
to judge appears more
advantageous to issue
previously attendance
requiring on Examination
mandates to
other actors on the
Judicial theatre.
3. Art Exceptions are where on consideration upon hearing the of it
state of the case as resulting from the examination of the Applicant
as entered in the Record it appears to the Judge that the purposes
of justice may be more effectually accomplished by the simultaneous
or previous issuing of mandate Attendance requiring
or Examination mandate as the case may appear to require
addressed to a proposal Copursuer or is a proposedsupposed Evidence holder
and proposed Evidence furnishes of evidence personal, real or
within, or of all three sorts or any two thereof, as the case may be
|
Identifier: | JB/052/383/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-07-20 |
2-4 |
||
|
052 |
procedure code |
||
|
383 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d2 / e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
17056 |
|||
