JB/104/056/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/056/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>8 Aug. 1811 10<lb/>
Fallacies</head>
<note>Ch. Classification</note>


<p>10</p>


<p><del><add>Those</add> Placing <gap/> <gap/> <add><gap/> <gap/></add> fifth B. where for the purposes of<lb/>
<gap/> it required to be <gap/> before B.</del></p>
<note>20<lb/>
The order in which<lb/>
the heads themselves<lb/>
would be displayed<lb/>
to best advantage<lb/>
coincides not <sic>compleatly</sic><lb/>
with that in<lb/>
which the matters<lb/>
contained under them<lb/>
will be displayed to<lb/>
best advantage</note>
<p>In the classing of these fallacies <add>the force of</add> which seemed to direct <add>address</add> itself<lb/>
<del>to the affections</del> <add>to the affections, together with those of which the force seemed to direct</add> <add>respectively to address</add><lb/>
<add>itself to the imagination and the judgment</add>, the order which <del>seemed preferable on other</del><lb/>
accounts <del>for the <gap/></del> for the marshalling of the<lb/>
divisional titles <add>had they stood by</add> themselves would have <add>here have</unclear></add> been preferred<lb/>
could not with advantage be given to the <add>portions of</add> matter<del>s</del><lb/>
respectively contained <add>brought to view</add> under those heads.</p>
<p>If of two portions <add>divisions</add> of matter one can not so well <add>there be one and but one which</add><lb/>
be understood till the other has passed under review<lb/>
that without which the other can not so well be understood<lb/>
<del>regains</del> <add>claims</add> precedence by a title to which no<lb/>
other of equal cogency <add>goodness</add> can be opposed. If for the understanding<lb/>
if the rendering of it be necessary, <add>so irresistible is</add> the consideration <add>by</add> which adjudge<lb/>
the precedence <add>is adjudged</add> to be is so strong that no other can enter into competition with it.</p>
<note>21<lb/>
As between the matters<lb/>
contained under any<lb/>
two heads one indispensable<lb/>
requisite<lb/>
is that which to<lb/>
its being understood<lb/>
requires that the other<lb/>
be first read, should<lb/>
in the work stand<lb/>
last.</note>
<p>By this consideration it is that that order has <add>was</add><lb/>
been dictated <add>determined</add>, which has been <add>will be seen</add> observed in <add>given to</add> the marshalling<lb/>
of the <del><gap/></del> several portions of matter<lb/>
which will be found under the several titles <add>heads</add>, and thence<lb/>
in the marshalling of <add>order given on that occasion to</add> the heads or titles themselves.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:15, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

8 Aug. 1811 10
Fallacies
Ch. Classification

10

Those Placing fifth B. where for the purposes of
it required to be before B.

20
The order in which
the heads themselves
would be displayed
to best advantage
coincides not compleatly
with that in
which the matters
contained under them
will be displayed to
best advantage

In the classing of these fallacies the force of which seemed to direct address itself
to the affections to the affections, together with those of which the force seemed to direct respectively to address
itself to the imagination and the judgment, the order which seemed preferable on other
accounts for the for the marshalling of the
divisional titles had they stood by themselves would have here have</unclear> been preferred
could not with advantage be given to the portions of matters
respectively contained brought to view under those heads.

If of two portions divisions of matter one can not so well there be one and but one which
be understood till the other has passed under review
that without which the other can not so well be understood
regains claims precedence by a title to which no
other of equal cogency goodness can be opposed. If for the understanding
if the rendering of it be necessary, so irresistible is the consideration by which adjudge
the precedence is adjudged to be is so strong that no other can enter into competition with it.

21
As between the matters
contained under any
two heads one indispensable
requisite
is that which to
its being understood
requires that the other
be first read, should
in the work stand
last.

By this consideration it is that that order has was
been dictated determined, which has been will be seen observed in given to the marshalling
of the several portions of matter
which will be found under the several titles heads, and thence
in the marshalling of order given on that occasion to the heads or titles themselves.



Identifier: | JB/104/056/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-08-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

20-21

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

056

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d10 / e10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman 1808

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1808

Notes public

ID Number

34027

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in