JB/050/145/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/145/001: Difference between revisions

Lidunn (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>Pardon</head><lb/>


<p><unclear>Thus</unclear> either the circumstance specified is not in being <add><gap/></add> <unclear>&amp;</unclear> incapable therefore of being <gap/><lb/> the subject of a Trial, or is of too vague a nature to be collected from legal<lb/> evidence. [under <add>limitations of legal rules</add> legal limitations.]<lb/></p>  
<head>PARDON</head>
<p>others either the circumstance specified is not in being <add><unclear><sic>isse</sic></unclear><!-- rushed spelling/mis-spelling or 'issue'? --></add> &amp; incapable therefore of being <sic>ma</sic><!-- unfinished: 'made' ? -->
<lb/>  
the subject of a Trial, or is of too vague a nature to be collected from legal
<lb/>  
evidence. [under, legal limitations <add>limitations of legal rules</add>.]
<lb/></p>  


<p>The check therefore here <unclear>imposed</unclear> is the only check <unclear>competent</unclear> to the subject, the<lb/> same as that upon Juries the sense of shame - to which may be added, impeachment<lb/>
<p>The check therefore here imposed, is the only check competent to the subject, the
of the Person applying for the Pardon in any flagrant case <del>which</del> <add>as it ca</add><lb/> of <unclear>the</unclear> suggestion containing a very <unclear>obvious</unclear> falsehood -<lb/></p>
<lb/>  
same as that upon Juries the sense of shame &#x2014; to which may be added, Impeachment
<lb/>
of the Person applying for the Pardon in any flagrant case <del>where</del> <add>as in <sic>ca</sic><!-- unfinished: 'case' ? --></add>
<lb/>  
of the suggestion containing a very notorious falsehood - &#x2014;
<lb/></p>


<p>In the instance of particular crimes [to be specified by the law] for which, (should<lb/>
<p>In the instance of particular crimes [to be specified by the law] for which, (should
there be any such), it may be thought advisable to retain punishments <hi rend='underline'>in <unclear>hor</unclear></hi><lb/> as it is called, without design of universal execution - as <del>in</del> <add>under</add> the Laws<lb/> against Papists, these specifications may be dispensed with.<lb/></p>
<lb/>
 
there be any such), it may be thought <sic>adviseable</sic> to retain punishments <hi rend='underline'>in <gap/></hi>
<note><gap/>? should he name of the person applying for the <gap/> be specified in the <gap/> would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture <add>was forced to</add> himself to procure one
<lb/>  
<gap/> too whether any <unclear>distinction</unclear> this law between crimes</note><pb/>
as it is called, without design of universal execution &#x2014; as <del>in</del> <add>under</add> the Laws
<lb/>  
against Papists, these specifications may be dispensed with. <note>Qu? should the name of the person applying for the Pardon be specified in the Instrument would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture <add>was forced to</add> himself to procure one
Qu. <sic>too</sic> whether any distinction <unclear>in</unclear> this head between Crimes .</note>
<lb/></p>


<!-- horizontal line -->
<pb/>




Line 21: Line 38:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:54, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


PARDON

others either the circumstance specified is not in being isse & incapable therefore of being ma
the subject of a Trial, or is of too vague a nature to be collected from legal
evidence. [under, legal limitations limitations of legal rules.]

The check therefore here imposed, is the only check competent to the subject, the
same as that upon Juries the sense of shame — to which may be added, Impeachment
of the Person applying for the Pardon in any flagrant case where as in ca
of the suggestion containing a very notorious falsehood - —

In the instance of particular crimes [to be specified by the law] for which, (should
there be any such), it may be thought adviseable to retain punishments in
as it is called, without design of universal execution — as in under the Laws
against Papists, these specifications may be dispensed with. Qu? should the name of the person applying for the Pardon be specified in the Instrument would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture was forced to himself to procure one Qu. too whether any distinction in this head between Crimes .


---page break---





Identifier: | JB/050/145/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

145

Info in main headings field

pardon

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16136

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in