★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>4 July 1811 July 4 + + <del>C</del> F 12<lb/> | |||
Fallacies Fallacies</head> | |||
<note>V. <foreign>ad superstitionem</foreign><lb/> | |||
Ch. 2. Posterity Chainers</note> | |||
<p>7 or 1</p> | |||
<p>§.6. Fallacy — how included in the attempt to <del>question</del> <add>nullify</add> future laws.</p> | |||
<note>or 7<lb/> | |||
<foreign>Considitur</foreign> what<lb/> | |||
is done in this case<lb/> | |||
by the sovereign is<lb/> | |||
not argument nor<lb/> | |||
therefore fallacy.</note> | |||
<p>Towards the producing of this effect whatsoever is done<lb/> | |||
by the sovereignty itself by the <add>a</add> <del><gap/></del> sovereign legislature<lb/> | |||
itself acting as such is indeed not an argument<lb/> | |||
and therefore not a fallacy.</p> | |||
<p>Under the denomination of a fallacy nothing <add>(it must be admitted)</add> can<lb/> | |||
with propriety be ranked, but what comes under the<lb/> | |||
denomination of an argument. An act by which legislative<lb/> | |||
power is exercised or endeavoured to be exercised,<lb/> | |||
is not itself an argument, and therefore <del><gap/></del> can<lb/> | |||
not be itself a fallacy.</p> | |||
<note>or 8<lb/> | |||
But in <unclear>this case</unclear><lb/> | |||
it forms ground for<lb/> | |||
the fallacy.<lb/> | |||
1. Though the full<lb/> | |||
accomplishment<lb/> | |||
of such a design <del>is</del><lb/> | |||
viz. for ever, is<lb/> | |||
impossible, yet<lb/> | |||
being endeavoured at<lb/> | |||
it may <add>endeavour</add> for an indefinite<lb/> | |||
time continue<lb/> | |||
successful,<lb/> | |||
and during that time<lb/> | |||
the fallacy may<lb/> | |||
be employed in the<lb/> | |||
support of it.</note> | |||
<p><del>But on</del> True: but on this occasion, <del>room</del> <add>there are two cases on</add> <add>what</add> <add>ground</add><lb/> | |||
exists in which a <add>an argument and thence</add> a fallacy may be raised in two cases:</p> | |||
<p><del><gap/></del> 1. In the first place, if the state of things thus<lb/> | |||
attempted to be <sic>upholden</sic> <add>upheld</add> is in itself, besides being<lb/> | |||
an undesirable <del>one</del> an impossible one, on this supposition, <add>in this case</add><lb/> | |||
even supposing the sovereignty in question to have<lb/> | |||
done its utmost to <del>bring about</del> <add>establish</add> <add>to give establishment to</add> such a state of things<lb/> | |||
any argument by which the <add>actual</add> establishment of it is assumed,<lb/> | |||
must in the eyes of <add>by</add> every person <del>by</del> <add>to</add> whom<lb/> | |||
the <del>supposed</del> <add>assumed</add> <add>supposed</add> fact presents itself as <add>an</add> impossible <add>one</add>, be considered<lb/> | |||
as fallacious.</p> | |||
<note>or 9<lb/> | |||
2. Without any such<lb/> | |||
design on the part<lb/> | |||
of the sovereignty,<lb/> | |||
at the time,<lb/> | |||
the fallacy may<lb/> | |||
at a subsequent time<lb/> | |||
be employed in<lb/> | |||
the endeavour to<lb/> | |||
cause such design<lb/> | |||
to be <gap/></note> | |||
<p>In the next place, the fallaciousness of the argument<lb/> | |||
will appear <del><gap/></del> still more unequivocal, if<lb/> | |||
so it be, that <add>in express terms</add> no endeavour of this sort has been<lb/> | |||
employed by the legislature, and that by the argumentation<lb/> | |||
it is only in the way of inference that the existence <add>on the part of the legislator</add><lb/> | |||
of any such attempt is endeavoured to be established.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
4 July 1811 July 4 + + C F 12
Fallacies Fallacies
V. ad superstitionem
Ch. 2. Posterity Chainers
7 or 1
§.6. Fallacy — how included in the attempt to question nullify future laws.
or 7
Considitur what
is done in this case
by the sovereign is
not argument nor
therefore fallacy.
Towards the producing of this effect whatsoever is done
by the sovereignty itself by the a sovereign legislature
itself acting as such is indeed not an argument
and therefore not a fallacy.
Under the denomination of a fallacy nothing (it must be admitted) can
with propriety be ranked, but what comes under the
denomination of an argument. An act by which legislative
power is exercised or endeavoured to be exercised,
is not itself an argument, and therefore can
not be itself a fallacy.
or 8
But in this case
it forms ground for
the fallacy.
1. Though the full
accomplishment
of such a design is
viz. for ever, is
impossible, yet
being endeavoured at
it may endeavour for an indefinite
time continue
successful,
and during that time
the fallacy may
be employed in the
support of it.
But on True: but on this occasion, room there are two cases on what ground
exists in which a an argument and thence a fallacy may be raised in two cases:
1. In the first place, if the state of things thus
attempted to be upholden upheld is in itself, besides being
an undesirable one an impossible one, on this supposition, in this case
even supposing the sovereignty in question to have
done its utmost to bring about establish to give establishment to such a state of things
any argument by which the actual establishment of it is assumed,
must in the eyes of by every person by to whom
the supposed assumed supposed fact presents itself as an impossible one, be considered
as fallacious.
or 9
2. Without any such
design on the part
of the sovereignty,
at the time,
the fallacy may
at a subsequent time
be employed in
the endeavour to
cause such design
to be
In the next place, the fallaciousness of the argument
will appear still more unequivocal, if
so it be, that in express terms no endeavour of this sort has been
employed by the legislature, and that by the argumentation
it is only in the way of inference that the existence on the part of the legislator
of any such attempt is endeavoured to be established.
Identifier: | JB/104/251/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1811-07-04 |
or 7 - or 9 |
||
104 |
fallacies |
||
251 |
fallacies |
||
001 |
fallacy - how included in the attempt to nullify future laws |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c7 or c1 / d12 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
34222 |
|||