JB/104/277/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/277/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1819 Aug. 14<lb/>
Fallacies</head>
 
<note>Ch. Logical High fliers<lb/>
2. <sic>Attornies</sic></note>
 
<p>3</p>
 
<p>Within the memory of the writer of this, the like experience<lb/>
began to suggest, to a certain class of lawyers, the same <add>like</add><lb/>
expedient. <del>Force</del> <add>Power</add> not being in this case called into action<lb/>
as in that other it has been more successful. [The breed<lb/>
of <sic>Attornies</sic> has become extinct: the breed of Solicitors has<lb/>
swallowed it up.] <del>The term</del> Like <add>As</add> the <del>term</del> appellative purveyor<lb/>
in the days of the Plantagenets, the term <hi rend="underline">Attorney</hi> had<lb/>
become odious in the days of the <sic>Gwelfs</sic>, <add>and from a similar cause.</add> Solicitor as being<lb/>
less in use was less so. <hi rend="underline">Solicitor</hi> was <add>moreover</add> the name which the<lb/>
sort of lawyer in question was known by <del>when</del> in so far as<lb/>
<add>the theatre of</add> his practice was <del>in</del> a Court <del>of</del> called a Court of Equity.<lb/>
<note>The sad misnomer!</note><lb/>
In a Court of Equity more <del>money passes</del> <add><gap/></add> <add>still</add> <add>still larger proportion money</add> of other people's <add><unclear>men</unclear></add><lb/>
money passes through his hands, and in the like proportion<lb/>
sticks to them: hence his superior importance. Be this<lb/>
as it may the sort of lawyer who fifty years ago would<lb/>
have been called by the name of Attorney and no other, is <add>now</add><lb/>
now called <add>[calls himself and is] generally</add> <add>commonly</add> <add>called</add> by the name of <del><gap/></del> Solicitor. <del>To <gap/> him<lb/>
as formerly, <add>by the description</add> Attorney to sh</del> On the cover of a letter<lb/>
to <sic>stile</sic> him as formerly <del>as</del> Attorney at law would now<lb/>
be regarded <add>either</add> as an affront or a mark of ignorance.<lb/>
How <del>far</del>, in so far as <del>it was a device for <add>the <gap/></add></del><lb/>
escape from odium was the object, the device has in this<lb/>
instance been successful <del><gap/></del> belongs not to the present<lb/>
purpose any more than to <sic>shew</sic> <add>bring to view</add> the injustice with<lb/>
which <add>in this instance</add> the odium due to the authors of abuse, has fixed<lb/>
itself exclusively upon the subordinate instruments.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:16, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Aug. 14
Fallacies

Ch. Logical High fliers
2. Attornies

3

Within the memory of the writer of this, the like experience
began to suggest, to a certain class of lawyers, the same like
expedient. Force Power not being in this case called into action
as in that other it has been more successful. [The breed
of Attornies has become extinct: the breed of Solicitors has
swallowed it up.] The term Like As the term appellative purveyor
in the days of the Plantagenets, the term Attorney had
become odious in the days of the Gwelfs, and from a similar cause. Solicitor as being
less in use was less so. Solicitor was moreover the name which the
sort of lawyer in question was known by when in so far as
the theatre of his practice was in a Court of called a Court of Equity.
The sad misnomer!
In a Court of Equity more money passes still still larger proportion money of other people's men
money passes through his hands, and in the like proportion
sticks to them: hence his superior importance. Be this
as it may the sort of lawyer who fifty years ago would
have been called by the name of Attorney and no other, is now
now called [calls himself and is] generally commonly called by the name of Solicitor. To him
as formerly, by the description Attorney to sh
On the cover of a letter
to stile him as formerly as Attorney at law would now
be regarded either as an affront or a mark of ignorance.
How far, in so far as it was a device for the
escape from odium was the object, the device has in this
instance been successful belongs not to the present
purpose any more than to shew bring to view the injustice with
which in this instance the odium due to the authors of abuse, has fixed
itself exclusively upon the subordinate instruments.




Identifier: | JB/104/277/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1819-08-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

277

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34248

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in