★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head> PREFATORIA 3)</head> | |||
<p>which this science has over the others, as examples<lb/> | |||
of accurate reasoning. The Ideas to be<lb/> | |||
compared are few. This science considers<lb/> | |||
objects in one or at most in two points<lb/> | |||
of view only, their figure & their Quantity.<lb/> | |||
<!-- The next sentence may have transcription errors because I can't understand its meaning. -->The terms used <del>are ne</del> <add>are not expressive of Ideas</add> [approach nears<lb/> | |||
<add>so complex as those</add> to simple Ideas than <unclear>those</unclear>] of other sciences,</p> | |||
<p><del>Take an example</del></p> | |||
<p>To prove the advantage of this science<lb/> | |||
in exemplifying the method of correct<lb/> | |||
reasoning. Let such reasoning be<lb/> | |||
exemplified by some proposition in<lb/> | |||
Morality & Chemistry, and see the<lb/> | |||
difficulty you will be at in finding<lb/> | |||
Postulates which shall be generally <unclear>received</unclear><lb/> | |||
as such, and see <del><gap/></del> of what complex<lb/> | |||
Ideas the terms used will be expressive<lb/> | |||
of. <unclear>In prop:<hi rend="superscript">s</hi></unclear> of morality in particular.</p> | |||
<p><unclear>announce</unclear> here some moral proposition <del><gap/></del> explaining<lb/> | |||
some mode of conduct which men would be happier <add>[it would be better]</add><lb/> | |||
if they observed. <unclear>Shew</unclear> how impracticable it would<lb/> | |||
be to find <del><gap/></del> postulates which interest <gap/><lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> permit to be generally received.</p> | |||
<p>Shew how far the Ideas are removed from<lb/> | |||
simple ones, concluding with <gap/> nothing it</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
PREFATORIA 3)
which this science has over the others, as examples
of accurate reasoning. The Ideas to be
compared are few. This science considers
objects in one or at most in two points
of view only, their figure & their Quantity.
The terms used are ne are not expressive of Ideas [approach nears
so complex as those to simple Ideas than those] of other sciences,
Take an example
To prove the advantage of this science
in exemplifying the method of correct
reasoning. Let such reasoning be
exemplified by some proposition in
Morality & Chemistry, and see the
difficulty you will be at in finding
Postulates which shall be generally received
as such, and see of what complex
Ideas the terms used will be expressive
of. In prop:s of morality in particular.
announce here some moral proposition explaining
some mode of conduct which men would be happier [it would be better]
if they observed. Shew how impracticable it would
be to find postulates which interest
permit to be generally received.
Shew how far the Ideas are removed from
simple ones, concluding with nothing it
|
Identifier: | JB/135/036/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
135 |
|||
|
036 |
prefatoria |
||
|
003 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f1 / f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
|
sir samuel bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [pro patria motif]]] |
||
|
46154 |
|||
