JB/135/076/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/076/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head><!-- Pencil heading -->Arithmetic 11. Dec 1794</head>
<p><hi rend="underline">Square</hi> <hi rend="underline">root</hi> means<lb/>
the root of the <lb/>
square: not a <add>figure</add> <del>root</del> <lb/>
of a square form, <lb/>
but the root of a <lb/>
figure of a square <lb/>
form.</p> 
 
<p>The ambiguity arises <lb/>
from the double <lb/>
signification of <lb/>
the word square, <lb/>
having either a substantive <lb/>
or an adjective, <lb/>
<del>Then</del> In <lb/>
the <del>above</del> expression <lb/>
square root it <del>appears</del> <lb/>
<del>to be used</del> <lb/>
shews at first sight <lb/>
as if used adjectively <lb/>
(that being its <lb/>
original signification) <lb/>
whereas it <lb/>
is intended to be <lb/>
taken substantively <lb/>
The square root, <lb/>
<del>just as <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
meaning the root <lb/>
of the square, just <lb/>
as we say the <hi rend="underline">Par</hi>ish <lb/>
Priest, meaning <lb/>
the Priest of <lb/>
the Parish.</p> 
<p>By means of this <lb/>
ambiguity the <lb/>
same sort of perplexity <lb/>
is produced <lb/>
as would be produced <lb/>
if meaning to stile <lb/>
a particular man <lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">Man of the Green</hi>, <lb/>
we were to speak of <lb/>
him by the name of <lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">green</hi> man.</p><pb/>
 
<p>So the Cube Root ,<lb/>
means the root of <lb/>
the Cube.</p> 
 
<p>A Square number <lb/>
is so called from <lb/>
this circumstance, <lb/>
from this property <lb/>
belonging to it, that <lb/>
supposing the units <lb/>
denoted by it to <lb/>
be squares, they <lb/>
would, taken together, <lb/>
be capable <lb/>
of being arranged <lb/>
in the form of a <lb/>
square: which is <lb/>
not the case <del>of</del> with <lb/>
any number that <lb/>
is not a square. <lb/>
Thus 4 is a square <lb/>
number: for 4 equal <lb/>
squares are capable <lb/>
of being arranged in <lb/>
the form of a square.  <lb/>
For the same reason<lb/>
so is 9: so <del>is</del><add>are</add> 16, <lb/>
25 &amp;c.  <del>Whereas</del><lb/>
at the same time <lb/>
that <del>no number</del><add>that property</add> <lb/>
<del>between</del> is not found <lb/>
in any of the intermediate <lb/>
numbers.  <lb/>
You can not make <lb/>
a square out of two<lb/>
squares: nor out of<lb/>
3 squares: nor out<lb/>
of 5 squares; nor<lb/>
out of 6,7, 8, 10,<lb/>
11,12,13,14,15, or <lb/>
17 squares, and so <lb/>
on.</p><pb/>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Four</hi> being a square <lb/>
number, 2 is the <lb/>
square root of that <lb/>
number: that is <lb/>
4 being such a <lb/>
number that a <lb/>
set of squares <lb/>
composed of such <lb/>
a number <add>of squares</add> are <lb/>
capable of being <lb/>
placed in form <lb/>
of a square, when <lb/>
that form is produced  <lb/>
<add><del><gap/> [+]</del></add>, two of those <note>[+} the figure being<lb/>
so situated as<lb/>
that 2 of its sides<lb/>
shall be parallel<lb/>
to the horizon</note><lb/>
component squares <lb/>
will form the <del>seat</del> <lb/>
bottom, base, or <lb/>
<hi rend="underline">root</hi> as it may <note>The truth of the above<lb/>
<add>explanation</add> <del>this</del> may be seen<lb/>
exemplified in a<lb/>
common Draught<lb/>
Board composed as<lb/>
it is of 64 squares<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">On</hi> a line of squares<lb/>
composed of two in<lb/>length, <add>as in a base or root</add> you may observe<lb/>
a <del>squ</del> compound<lb/>
square <hi rend="underline">standing</hi><lb/>
composed of<lb/>
4 elementary squares<lb/>
on a line of 3, a<lb/>
square composed of<lb/>
9: on a line of<lb/>
4, a square composed<lb/>
of 16: on a<lb/>
line of 5, a square<lb/>
composed of 25:<lb/>
on a line of 6, a<lb/>
square composed<lb/>
of 36: and on a<lb/>
line of 7, a square<lb/>
composed of 49:<lb/>
all these over and<lb/>
above the whole square<lb/>
of 64 <gap/> composed of<lb/>the whole line of 8</note><lb/>
be called of such <lb/>
square.</p> 
<p>A square number <lb/>
may accordingly <add>therefore</add> <lb/>
be defined, any <lb/>
number of which <lb/>
the component units <lb/>
if squares, are capable <lb/>
of being arranged <lb/>
<del>in form of</del> <lb/>
<del>a square</del> without <lb/>
any interstices, in <lb/>
the form of a square.</p>
<p>In like manner <lb/>
a cube number <lb/>
may be defined <lb/>
any number of<lb/>
which the component <lb/>
units, if <lb/>
cubes, are capable <lb/>
of being arranged <lb/>
without any interstices <lb/>
in the figure <lb/>
of a cube.</p> <pb/>
 
 




Line 9: Line 171:
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
</del>{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:35, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Arithmetic 11. Dec 1794

Square root means
the root of the
square: not a figure root
of a square form,
but the root of a
figure of a square
form.

The ambiguity arises
from the double
signification of
the word square,
having either a substantive
or an adjective,
Then In
the above expression
square root it appears
to be used
shews at first sight
as if used adjectively
(that being its
original signification)
whereas it
is intended to be
taken substantively
The square root,
just as
meaning the root
of the square, just
as we say the Parish
Priest, meaning
the Priest of
the Parish.

By means of this
ambiguity the
same sort of perplexity
is produced
as would be produced
if meaning to stile
a particular man
the Man of the Green,
we were to speak of
him by the name of
the green man.


---page break---

So the Cube Root ,
means the root of
the Cube.

A Square number
is so called from
this circumstance,
from this property
belonging to it, that
supposing the units
denoted by it to
be squares, they
would, taken together,
be capable
of being arranged
in the form of a
square: which is
not the case of with
any number that
is not a square.
Thus 4 is a square
number: for 4 equal
squares are capable
of being arranged in
the form of a square.
For the same reason
so is 9: so isare 16,
25 &c. Whereas
at the same time
that no numberthat property
between is not found
in any of the intermediate
numbers.
You can not make
a square out of two
squares: nor out of
3 squares: nor out
of 5 squares; nor
out of 6,7, 8, 10,
11,12,13,14,15, or
17 squares, and so
on.


---page break---

Four being a square
number, 2 is the
square root of that
number: that is
4 being such a
number that a
set of squares
composed of such
a number of squares are
capable of being
placed in form
of a square, when
that form is produced
[+], two of those [+} the figure being
so situated as
that 2 of its sides
shall be parallel
to the horizon

component squares
will form the seat
bottom, base, or
root as it may The truth of the above
explanation this may be seen
exemplified in a
common Draught
Board composed as
it is of 64 squares
On a line of squares
composed of two in
length, as in a base or root you may observe
a squ compound
square standing
composed of
4 elementary squares
on a line of 3, a
square composed of
9: on a line of
4, a square composed
of 16: on a
line of 5, a square
composed of 25:
on a line of 6, a
square composed
of 36: and on a
line of 7, a square
composed of 49:
all these over and
above the whole square
of 64 composed of
the whole line of 8

be called of such
square.

A square number
may accordingly therefore
be defined, any
number of which
the component units
if squares, are capable
of being arranged
in form of
a square without
any interstices, in
the form of a square.

In like manner
a cube number
may be defined
any number of
which the component
units, if
cubes, are capable
of being arranged
without any interstices
in the figure
of a cube.


---page break---





Identifier: | JB/135/076/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

1794-12-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

135

Main Headings

Folio number

076

Info in main headings field

arithmetic

Image

002

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46194

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in