JB/135/192/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/192/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1831 May 17 M<lb/>
Posology</head>


<note>1 Alegomorphics<lb/>
&sect; Elucidation continued<lb/>
Nomenclature amended</note>


<p>2</p>
<note><del>9</del> 4<lb/>
Arithmetical is part<lb/>
of the universal international<lb/>
language: as<lb/>
<del>Here</del> <add>more effectually than</add> jurisprudence language<lb/>
is.: <del><gap/></del></note>
<p>4. The language of arithmetic including algebra and<lb/>
its <foreign>et c&aelig;teras</foreign>, is part and parcel of the universal international<lb/>
<del>&sect; Elucidation continued &#x2014; Nomenclature amended</del><lb/>
language: it is analogous in that respect to universal jurisprudence:<lb/>
but is more effectually so than <hi rend="underline">that</hi> is</p>
<note><del>10</del> 5<lb/>
In legislation and<lb/>
judicial language, modification<lb/>
of <gap/><lb/>
three.<lb/>
1. Defalcation or say Subtraction<lb/>
2. Addition<lb/>
3. Substitution &#x2014; union of<lb/>
the two</note>
<p>5. In the language of <add>English</add> Legislation and Judication, <add>of</add> the<lb/>
operative denominated amendment, there are three modifications,<lb/>
namely 1. <sic>Substraction</sic> or say Defalcation or say <unclear><sic>Substractive</sic></unclear>.<lb/>
2. Addition. 3. Substitution, which is performed by the union of<lb/>
both: commencing naturally with <sic>substraction</sic> as being the most universally<lb/>
practicable</p>
<note><del>11</del> 6<lb/>
Apply this to alegomorphic<lb/>
posology.</note>
<p>Applying <add>Let us apply</add> this analysis to alegomorphic posology: that is<lb/>
to say equivalence in its <unclear>five</unclear> several modes, of which <hi rend="underline">above</hi></p>
<note><del>12</del> 7<lb/>
<del>In the way of substitution</del><lb/>
I. <sic>Substraction</sic>: in this<lb/>
way little will be to be<lb/>
done</note>
<p>7. I. In the way of simple <del><add>mere</add></del> <sic>substraction</sic> &#x2014; mere <sic>substraction</sic> is <gap/><lb/>
found little to do. Why? <add>How so?</add> Because wheresoever we find or think<lb/>
we find an unapt denomination, that which <add><unclear>over high</unclear></add> ought to be done will<lb/>
be thought to be incomplete if we stop there, and <sic>omitt</sic> to give mention to substitute<lb/>
to it that which <hi rend="underline">ought</hi> to be done</p>
<note><del>13</del> 8<lb/>
II. Addition were to<lb/>
the denominations in use</note>
<p>8. II. Next to this will come <hi rend="underline">addition</hi>: addition to the stock of<lb/>
nomenclature of apt denominations &#x2014; the stock which is found already<lb/>
in existence in the body of the language</p>
<note><del>14</del> 9<lb/>
III. Substitution: viz. of<lb/>
apt to the <sic>unapt</sic> denominations<lb/>
in use</note>
<p>9. III. Lastly will come substitution of what we deem apt to what<lb/>
we deem <sic>unapt</sic>: and here <add>the existence of</add> inaptitude being <sic>alledged</sic>, the existence of<lb/>
inaptitude will require to be demonstrated.</p>
<note><del>15</del> 10<lb/>
Given accordingly<lb/>
will be all those<lb/>
denominations.</note>
<p>10 In each of these several cases lists of denominations will here<lb/>
need to be given: given accordingly shall these lists be.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:36, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1831 May 17 M
Posology

1 Alegomorphics
§ Elucidation continued
Nomenclature amended

2

9 4
Arithmetical is part
of the universal international
language: as
Here more effectually than jurisprudence language
is.:

4. The language of arithmetic including algebra and
its et cæteras, is part and parcel of the universal international
§ Elucidation continued — Nomenclature amended
language: it is analogous in that respect to universal jurisprudence:
but is more effectually so than that is

10 5
In legislation and
judicial language, modification
of
three.
1. Defalcation or say Subtraction
2. Addition
3. Substitution — union of
the two

5. In the language of English Legislation and Judication, of the
operative denominated amendment, there are three modifications,
namely 1. Substraction or say Defalcation or say Substractive.
2. Addition. 3. Substitution, which is performed by the union of
both: commencing naturally with substraction as being the most universally
practicable

11 6
Apply this to alegomorphic
posology.

Applying Let us apply this analysis to alegomorphic posology: that is
to say equivalence in its five several modes, of which above

12 7
In the way of substitution
I. Substraction: in this
way little will be to be
done

7. I. In the way of simple mere substraction — mere substraction is
found little to do. Why? How so? Because wheresoever we find or think
we find an unapt denomination, that which over high ought to be done will
be thought to be incomplete if we stop there, and omitt to give mention to substitute
to it that which ought to be done

13 8
II. Addition were to
the denominations in use

8. II. Next to this will come addition: addition to the stock of
nomenclature of apt denominations — the stock which is found already
in existence in the body of the language

14 9
III. Substitution: viz. of
apt to the unapt denominations
in use

9. III. Lastly will come substitution of what we deem apt to what
we deem unapt: and here the existence of inaptitude being alledged, the existence of
inaptitude will require to be demonstrated.

15 10
Given accordingly
will be all those
denominations.

10 In each of these several cases lists of denominations will here
need to be given: given accordingly shall these lists be.



Identifier: | JB/135/192/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

1831-05-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

9-15

Box

135

Main Headings

posology

Folio number

192

Info in main headings field

posology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46310

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in