JB/004/085/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/004/085/001: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
Aj (talk | contribs)
294 edits
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
awardsmanage, Bureaucrats, giftadmin, staff, Administrators
44,619 edits
No edit summary
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>J B   1830 Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> 5
<head><note>JB</note>   1830 Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> 5
</head><head>Review
</head><head>Review<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>
</head>
</head>


<p>1.</p>
<note><gap/><gap/><lb/>
<p>Inadequate arrangement<lb/>for deciding suits by<lb/>arbitration<lb/></p>
IV. Arbitratrix<lb/>
<p>2</p>
V. Conciliatrix<lb/></note>
<p>Mutual consent necessary.<lb/></p>
 
1.<lb/>
Inadequate arrangements<lb/>
for deciding suits by<lb/>
arbitration<lb/>
 
2<lb/>
Mutual consent necessary.<lb/>
 
3.<lb/>
But where one suitor<lb/>
<foreign>mala fide</foreign> his consent<lb/>
to arbitration not obtainable.<lb/>
 
4.<lb/>
Such arbitration a trap<lb/>
invented in William<lb/>
third's days.<lb/>
 
5<lb/>
Portion <add>of</add> Jurisdiction<lb/>
filched from Chancery<lb/>
Judges by the words<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">in equity</hi> § 79.<lb/>
 
6<lb/>
Delays upon delays<lb/>
fees upon fees costs<lb/>
upon costs spun out<lb/>
in the Reconcilement<lb/>
court.<lb/>
 
7<lb/>
The examination copies<lb/>
if laid on the<lb/>
Court of Chancery<lb/>
Table would produce<lb/>
nothing but laughter.<lb/>
 
8<lb/>
That is all suitors in<lb/>
the Reconcilement<lb/>
Courts would get<lb/>
 
9<lb/>
True that if a pair of<lb/>
flies be caught in this<lb/>
web spiders enough<lb/>
would be at work upon<lb/>
them.<lb/>
 
10<lb/>
&sect;80 of the bill apparently<lb/>
taken from J.B.<lb/>
 
11<lb/>
With the exception of the<lb/>
oath the rest as far as<lb/>
it goes JB's proposal.<lb/>
 
<pb/>
 
12<lb/>
But if applicable by<lb/>
Arbitratrix why not<lb/>
by small <unclear><foreign>debtia &amp;<lb/>
legacia?</foreign></unclear>
 
13<lb/>
Apology for the insertion<lb/>
of the clause.<lb/>
 
14<lb/>
Though the power<lb/>
given it is one which<lb/>
would never be exercised &#x2014;<lb/>
 
15<lb/>
On the other hand the<lb/>
following power<lb/>
would be exercised to<lb/>
the last drop of blood.<lb/>
 
16<lb/>
1. Power of referring to<lb/>
courts of law or equity for<lb/>
decision.<lb/>
 
17<lb/>
2. <hi rend="underline">In attendant</hi> power<lb/>
of reference to Jury.<lb/>
 
18<lb/>
3. Power to order new trial.<lb/>
 
19<lb/>
4. Power of directing the<lb/>
Jury.<lb/>
 
20<lb/>
5. Power to such Court<lb/>
to order new trial.<lb/>
 
21.<lb/>
6. Power to Law Courts<lb/>
to set aside the award<lb/>
for arbitration on<lb/>
matters not referred.<lb/>
 
22.<lb/>
7. Power to regulate<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">instalments.</hi>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


<p>3.</p>
<p>But where one suitor<lb/>mala fide hi consent<lb/>to arbitration not obtainable.<lb/></p>


<p>4.</p>
<p>Such arbitration a trap<lb/>invented in William<lb/><unclear>thirds'</unclear> days.<lb/></p>


<p>5</p>
<p>Portion <add>of</add> Jurisdiction<lb/>filched from Chancery<lb/>Judge by the <unclear>wons</unclear><lb/> <hi rend="underline">in equity</hi> § 79.<lb/>
</p>


<p>6.</p>
<p>Delays upon delays<lb/>fees upon fees costs<lb/>upon costs spun out<lb/>in tho Reconcilement<lb/>court</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:27, 10 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

JB 1830 Augt 5 Reviewd


IV. Arbitratrix
V. Conciliatrix

1.
Inadequate arrangements
for deciding suits by
arbitration

2
Mutual consent necessary.

3.
But where one suitor
mala fide his consent
to arbitration not obtainable.

4.
Such arbitration a trap
invented in William
third's days.

5
Portion of Jurisdiction
filched from Chancery
Judges by the words
in equity § 79.

6
Delays upon delays
fees upon fees costs
upon costs spun out
in the Reconcilement
court.

7
The examination copies
if laid on the
Court of Chancery
Table would produce
nothing but laughter.

8
That is all suitors in
the Reconcilement
Courts would get

9
True that if a pair of
flies be caught in this
web spiders enough
would be at work upon
them.

10
§80 of the bill apparently
taken from J.B.

11
With the exception of the
oath the rest as far as
it goes JB's proposal.


---page break---

12
But if applicable by
Arbitratrix why not
by small debtia &
legacia?

13
Apology for the insertion
of the clause.

14
Though the power
given it is one which
would never be exercised —

15
On the other hand the
following power
would be exercised to
the last drop of blood.

16
1. Power of referring to
courts of law or equity for
decision.

17
2. In attendant power
of reference to Jury.

18
3. Power to order new trial.

19
4. Power of directing the
Jury.

20
5. Power to such Court
to order new trial.

21.
6. Power to Law Courts
to set aside the award
for arbitration on
matters not referred.

22.
7. Power to regulate
instalments.








Identifier: | JB/004/085/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1830-08-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-22

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

085

Info in main headings field

review

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

george bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

2006

Box Contents

Retrieved from "https://transcribe-bentham.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?title=JB/004/085/001&oldid=311516"
UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in